Optimizing Mechanical and Durability Properties of Eco-Friendly Composite Materials Using Recycled Fillers and ML Techniques

Year : 2025 | Volume : 13 | Issue : 05 | Page : 269 309
    By

    Brahma. Dutt. Purohit,

  • Nitin Kumar Samaiya,

  • Abhishek Verma,

  • Rupal Purhoit,

  1. Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Jaypee University, Guna, Madhya Pradesh, India
  2. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Jaypee University, Guna, Madhya Pradesh, India
  3. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Jaypee University, Guna, Madhya Pradesh, India
  4. Seniour Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, Govt. Polytechnic, Bhind, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable construction materials has intensified the exploration of recycled fillers as partial or full replacements for natural aggregates in composite materials. This study investigates the mechanical and durability performance of polymer matrix composites incorporating processed recycled fillers derived from construction and demolition (C&D) waste. Three distinct processing methods were employed to prepare the recycled fillers: untreated (URF), single processed (SPRF), and double processed (DPRF), with replacement levels ranging from 0% to 100%. The composite formulations were prepared using the Standard Composite Blending Method (SCBM), and their performance was evaluated through a series of mechanical and durability tests, including compressive strength, tensile strength, curing agent absorption, diffusion coefficient, and workability assessments. The results revealed that increasing recycled filler content led to reductions in strength and workability, primarily due to increased porosity and weak interfacial bonding. However, the double processed recycled filler (DPRF) consistently outperformed the other variants across all tests, demonstrating superior matrix compatibility, reduced permeability, and enhanced mechanical integrity, even at full replacement levels. Notably, the compressive strength increased from 28 to 90 days across all mixtures, indicating continued hydration and strength development. To support experimental findings, machine learning models—Polynomial Regression, Random Forest Regression, and Support Vector Regression (SVR)—were developed to predict mechanical properties based on input parameters such as filler type, replacement ratio, and curing duration. Among these, Polynomial Regression yielded the highest accuracy, with R² values exceeding 0.99 for tensile and flexural strength predictions. These outcomes validate the applicability of data-driven modelling in optimizing sustainable composite formulations. The study concludes that DPRF is a technically and environmentally viable substitute for natural aggregates in composite materials, and that predictive modelling can significantly enhance material design processes by enabling accurate performance estimation.

Keywords: Recycled aggregate composite material, DPRF, normal mixing approach, compressive strength, durability.

[This article belongs to Journal of Polymer and Composites ]

aWQ6MjI0ODc4fGZpbGVuYW1lOmJjZWE3M2QyLWZpLmF2aWZ8c2l6ZTp0aHVtYm5haWw=
How to cite this article:
Brahma. Dutt. Purohit, Nitin Kumar Samaiya, Abhishek Verma, Rupal Purhoit. Optimizing Mechanical and Durability Properties of Eco-Friendly Composite Materials Using Recycled Fillers and ML Techniques. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(05):269-309.
How to cite this URL:
Brahma. Dutt. Purohit, Nitin Kumar Samaiya, Abhishek Verma, Rupal Purhoit. Optimizing Mechanical and Durability Properties of Eco-Friendly Composite Materials Using Recycled Fillers and ML Techniques. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(05):269-309. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2025/view=224888


Browse Figures

References

1.  Rana A, Kalla P, Csetenyi LJ. Sustainable use of marble slurry in concrete. Journal of cleaner production. 2015 May 1;94:304-11.

2. Gagg CR. Cement and concrete as an engineering material: An historic appraisal and case study analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2014 May 1;40:114-40.

3. Ghosh S, Ghosh S, Aich A. Rebuilding C&D waste recycling efforts in India. Waste Management World. 2011 Sep;12(5).

4. Pallewatta S, Weerasooriyagedara M, Bordoloi S, Sarmah AK, Vithanage M. Reprocessed construction and demolition waste as an adsorbent: An appraisal. Science of the Total Environment. 2023 Jul 15;882:163340.

5. Jin R, Yuan H, Chen Q. Science mapping approach to assisting the review of construction and demolition waste management research published between 2009 and 2018. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019; 140:175–88.

6. Kou SC, Zhan BJ, Poon CS. Feasibility study of using recycled fresh composite material waste as coarse aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2012; 28:549–56.

7. Jean B, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Wang Y, Tan Z. Enhancing the mechanical and durability properties of fully recycled aggregate composite material using carbonated recycled fine aggregates. Materials (Basel). 2024;17(8):1715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17081715

8. Zhan BJ, Kou SC, Poon CS. Carbonation treatment of recycled composite material aggregate: Effect on transport properties and steel corrosion. Cem Concr Compos. 2019; 104:103360.

9. Zhang K, Wang W, Lin J, Liu J. Effects of different fine aggregates as sand replacement matrix phases on the carbonation properties of recycled aggregate composite material. Constr Build Mater. 2025; 468:140416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140416

10. Peng L, Wang S, Li L, Zhang Z. Steel corrosion and corrosion-induced cracking in reinforced composite material with carbonated recycled aggregate. Cem Concr Compos. 2022; 133:104694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104694

11. Huang H, Yang H, Liu Y, Chen C, Sun Z. Development of low-carbon and cost-effective ultra-high-performance composite material using carbonated recycled fine aggregate. Constr Build Mater. 2023; 399:132575.

12. Wei W, Wu H, Jin R, Chen X. Workability and mechanical properties of microwave heating for recovering high-quality aggregate from composite material. Constr Build Mater. 2021; 276:122237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122237

13. Taylor PC, et al. Integrated materials and construction practices for composite material pavement: A state-of-the-practice manual. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Pavement Technology; 2007.

14. Taylor PC, et al. Integrated materials and construction practices for composite material pavement: A state-of-the-practice manual. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Pavement Technology; 2007.

15. Tam VWY, Gao XF, Tam CM. Physio-chemical reactions in recycled aggregate composite material. J Hazard Mater. 2009; 163:823–8.

16. Dhir RK, Paine KA. Value-added sustainable use of recycled and secondary aggregates in composite material. Indian Concr J. 2010;84(3):7–26.

17. Babu VS, Kumar P, Rao C, Kumar R. Strength and durability characteristics of high-strength composite material with recycled aggregate: Influence of processing. J Sustain Cem-Based Mater. 2015;4(1):54–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2014.976777

18. Liu L, Alva G, Huang X, Fang G. Preparation, heat transfer and flow properties of microencapsulated phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016; 66:399–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.035

19. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS: 2386-1963. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete (Part I to VIII). New Delhi: BIS; 1963.

20. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS: 383-1970. Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete. 2nd ed. New Delhi: BIS; 1997.

21. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS: 456-2000. Plain and reinforced concrete – code of practice. 4th ed. New Delhi: BIS; 2000.

22. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS: 1489 (Part 1)-1991. Portland-pozzolana cement – specification (fly ash based). 3rd ed. New Delhi: BIS; 1991.

23. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS: 15388-2003. Specification for silica fume. New Delhi: BIS; 2003.

24. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS: 9103-1999. Concrete admixtures – specification. New Delhi: BIS; 1999.

25. Bureau of Indian Standards. Concrete mix proportioning – Guidelines. New Delhi: BIS; 2019.

26. Babu VS, Kumar P, Rao C. Mechanical properties of high-strength concrete with recycled aggregate: Influence of processing. Indian Concr J. 2014;88(5):10–26.

Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 13
Issue 05
Received 29/04/2025
Accepted 30/06/2025
Published 15/08/2025
Publication Time 108 Days
71


My IP

PlumX Metrics