Thermally Regulated Polymer-PCM Composites for Efficient Solar Energy Harvesting and Storage

Year : 2025 | Volume : 13 | Issue : 04 | Page : 153 163
    By

    Dhivakar Poosapadi,

  • J. Sofia Priya Dharshini,

  • P. Booma Devi,

  • Vikash Kumar,

  • Pankaj Kumar Ray,

  • Shiv Kumar Ray,

  • Binu Sukumar,

  • Nellore Manoj Kumar,

  • Yesudhas Abisha,

  1. Lead Engineer, Quest Global Services, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  2. Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Rajeev Gandhi Memorial College of Engineering and Technology, Nandyala, Andhra Pradesh, India
  3. Professor, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Rajadhani Institute of Engineering and Technology, Nagaroor, Kerala, India
  4. Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Rashtrakavi Ramdhari Singh Dinkar College of Engineering, Bihar,
  5. Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Guru Gobind Singh Educational Society’s Technical Campus, Jharkhand, India
  6. Assistant Professor, Bihar Engineering University, Patna, Bihar, India
  7. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, R.M.K Engineering College, Kavaraipettai, Tamil Nadu, India
  8. Adjunct Faculty, Department of Mathematics, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Thandalam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  9. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

This study investigates the development of high-performance; shape-stabilized polymer composites infused with phase change materials (PCMs) for thermal energy storage in solar energy applications. Polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) was employed as the core PCM due to its high latent heat and suitable melting point, while high-density polyethylene (HDPE) served as the supporting polymer matrix to provide structural stability. One of the primary limitations of PEG-based PCMs is their inherently low thermal conductivity (~0.2 W/m·K), which hampers efficient heat transfer. To overcome this, thermally conductive additives such as expanded graphite (EG) and graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) were incorporated in varying weight percentages to fabricate five composite formulations, labeled C1 through C5, using melt extrusion followed by compression moulding. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) revealed that the latent heat of fusion (ΔHm) declined modestly from 167.2 J/g for the unfilled PEG/HDPE matrix (C1) to 154.3 J/g for the composite with the highest filler content (C5), while maintaining a consistent melting temperature range (62.3–63.4 °C). Notably, thermal conductivity improved substantially from 0.28 W/m·K (C1) to 1.03 W/m·K (C5), enabling faster heat exchange. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed improved thermal degradation resistance, with onset temperatures rising from 327 °C to 343 °C. Leakage tests indicated enhanced shape-stability, increasing from 85.4% to 98.2%. Moreover, after 100 thermal cycles, the C5 composite retained 92.6% of its initial latent heat, underscoring its durability and suitability for long-term solar thermal storage applications

Keywords: Phase change material (PCM), Polymer composite, expanded graphite (EG), graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs).

[This article belongs to Journal of Polymer and Composites ]

aWQ6MjE1Njg1fGZpbGVuYW1lOmNkNTg5NWNmLWZpLmF2aWZ8c2l6ZTp0aHVtYm5haWw=
How to cite this article:
Dhivakar Poosapadi, J. Sofia Priya Dharshini, P. Booma Devi, Vikash Kumar, Pankaj Kumar Ray, Shiv Kumar Ray, Binu Sukumar, Nellore Manoj Kumar, Yesudhas Abisha. Thermally Regulated Polymer-PCM Composites for Efficient Solar Energy Harvesting and Storage. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(04):153-163.
How to cite this URL:
Dhivakar Poosapadi, J. Sofia Priya Dharshini, P. Booma Devi, Vikash Kumar, Pankaj Kumar Ray, Shiv Kumar Ray, Binu Sukumar, Nellore Manoj Kumar, Yesudhas Abisha. Thermally Regulated Polymer-PCM Composites for Efficient Solar Energy Harvesting and Storage. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(04):153-163. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2025/view=215689


Browse Figures

References

  1. World Energy Outlook 2021. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2021.
  2. Kalogirou SA. Solar energy engineering: processes and systems. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2013.
  3. Tyagi VV, Buddhi D. PCM thermal storage in solar heating systems: a state of art. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2007;11(6):1146–66.
  4. Sharma A, Tyagi VV, Chen CR, Buddhi D. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2009;13(2):318–45.
  5. Mehling H, Cabeza LF. Heat and cold storage with PCM: an up to date introduction into basics and applications. Berlin: Springer; 2008.
  6. Kenisarin MM. High-temperature phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14(3):955–70.
  7. Zhang Y, Zhou G, Lin K, Zhang Q, Di H. Application of latent heat thermal energy storage in buildings: state-of-the-art and outlook. Build Environ. 2007;42(6):2197–209.
  8. Zalba B, Marín JM, Cabeza LF, Mehling H. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change: materials, heat transfer analysis and applications. Appl Therm Eng. 2003;23(3):251–83.
  9. Sari A, Karaipekli A. Thermal conductivity and latent heat thermal energy storage characteristics of paraffin/expanded graphite composite as phase change material. Appl Therm Eng. 2007;27(8–9):1271–7.
  10. Yang R, Wang Y, Zhang L, Wu J, Gao Z. Development of paraffin wax/HDPE composites as form-stable phase change materials. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;120(3):1487–95.
  11. Zhang H, Wang X. Microencapsulation of n-octadecane with polyurea/polyurethane shell for thermal energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2009;93(7):1366–72.
  12. Nomura T, Okinaka N, Akiyama T. Impregnation of porous material with phase change material for thermal energy storage. Mater Chem Phys. 2009;115(1):846–50.
  13. Zeng J, Lin Y, Wang Y, Wang W, Zhang C. Graphene-based phase change materials for thermal energy storage: recent developments and future prospects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;138:110490.
  14. Wang X, Yu X, Ding Y, Yang Y, Liu X, Wang Q. Shape-stabilized composite PCMs based on boron nitride nanosheets for thermal energy storage. Energy. 2018;147:398–406.
  15. Li M, Wu Z, Tan J, Chen H, Liu T. Polyethylene glycol/graphene oxide composites for thermal energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2014;123:17–23.
  16. Song H, Chen X, Gao Y, Li Y, Cheng Y. Synergistic enhancement of thermal conductivity in paraffin-based composite PCMs with hybrid carbon nanofillers. Thermochim Acta. 2020;694:178772.
  17. Liu Y, Liu J, Wang Y, Zhang Q. Surface-modified nanofillers for shape-stabilized phase change materials: A review. Appl Energy. 2020;276:115487.
  18. Hawlader MNA, Uddin MS, Khin MM. Microencapsulated PCM thermal-energy storage system. Appl Energy. 2003;74(1–2):195–202.
  19. Khudhair AM, Farid MM. A review on energy conservation in building applications with thermal storage by latent heat using phase change materials. Energy Convers Manag. 2004;45(2):263–75.
  20. Baetens R, Jelle BP, Gustavsen A. Phase change materials for building applications: A state-of-the-art review. Energy Build. 2010;42(9):1361–8.
  21. Hong TH, Kim JH, Park H, Lim C, Lim H. Biopolymer-based PCM composites for building applications. Appl Therm Eng. 2020;180:115835.
  22. Zhang Y, Wang J, Wang X, Li X, Yang J. Recent development of bio-based PCMs for solar energy storage. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;139:110687.
  23. Lv P, Ding Y, Jin X, Duan H. 3D-printed phase change material composites for advanced thermal energy storage. Addit Manuf. 2020;33:101133.
  24. Tang F, Zhao CY. A study of polyethylene glycol/diatomite composite PCMs with enhanced thermal properties. Appl Energy. 2019;233–234:765–75.
  25. Tyagi VV, Kaushik SC, Tyagi SK. Advancement in solar thermal energy storage using PCM and their applications. Energy Convers Manag. 2012;49(3):706–20.
  26. Zhao CY, Zhang G. Review on microencapsulated phase change materials (MEPCMs): fabrication, characterization and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(8):3813–32.
  27. Fang G, Li H, Chen Z. Preparation and properties of polyethylene glycol/SiO₂ composites as shape-stabilized phase change materials. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2010;94(5):810–4.
  28. Gao X, Zhang Z, Meng Y. Heat transfer enhancement in PCM-based thermal energy storage system: A review. Energy Procedia. 2014;61:2434–7.
  29. Khan Z, Khan Z, Ghafoor A. A review of performance enhancement of PCM-based latent heat storage system within building envelope. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;54:14–33.
  30. Shukla A, Buddhi D, Sawhney RL. Solar water heaters with phase change material thermal energy storage medium: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2009;13(8):2119–25.
  31. Keerthiveettil Ramakrishnan S, Palanisamy S, Khan T, Ajithram A, Ahmed O. Mechanical, morphological and wear resistance of natural fiber / glass fiber-based polymer composites. BioResources. 2024;19(2):3271–89. doi:10.15376/biores.19.2.3271-3289.
  32. Palanisamy S, Mayandi K, Palaniappan M, Alavudeen A, Rajini N, Santulli C, et al. Characterization of Acacia caesia Bark Fibers (ACBFs). J Nat Fibers. 2021;19:1–12. doi:10.1080/15440478.2021.1993493.
  33. Almeshaal M, Palanisamy S, Murugesan TM, Palaniappan M, Santulli C. Physico-chemical characterization of Grewia Monticola Sond (GMS) fibers for prospective application in biocomposites. J Nat Fibers. 2022;19(17):15276–90. doi:10.1080/15440478.2022.2123076.
  34. Palaniappan M, Palanisamy S, Mani T, Alrasheedi N, Ataya S, Tadepalli S, et al. Novel Ficus retusa L. aerial root fiber: a sustainable alternative for synthetic fibres in polymer composites reinforcement. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. 2024;15:7585–601. doi:10.1007/s13399-024-05495-4.
  35. Palanisamy S, Mayandi K, Santulli C, Palaniappan M, Rajini N, Fragassa C. Tailoring Epoxy Composites with Acacia caesia Bark Fibers: Evaluating the Effects of Fiber Amount and Length on Material Characteristics. Fibers. 2023;11:63. doi:10.3390/fib11070063.
  36. Palanisamy S, Keerthiveettil Ramakrishnan S, Santulli C, Khan T, Ahmed O. Mechanical and wear performance evaluation of natural fiber/epoxy matrix composites. BioResources. 2024;19(4):8459–78. doi:10.15376/biores.19.4.8459-8478.
  37. Palanisamy S, Mayandi K, Alavudeen A, Palaniappan M, Dharmalingam S, Rajini N, et al. Wear Properties and Post-Moisture Absorption Mechanical Behavior of Kenaf/Banana-Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Composites. Fibers. 2022;10:32. doi:10.3390/fib10040032.
  38. Zhao Y, Zhang C, Li Y, et al. Thermal performance of a new PCM-based wallboard for energy-efficient buildings. Energy Build. 2016;123:120–7.
  39. Fang Y, Chen G, Chen Z, et al. Thermal properties and applications of organic–inorganic composite phase change materials. Energy Storage Mater. 2018;13:1–17.
  40. Rathore PKS, Shukla SK. Potential of macroencapsulation techniques for solar thermal energy storage applications: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2019;112:354–90.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 13
Issue 04
Received 28/05/2025
Accepted 05/06/2025
Published 21/06/2025
Publication Time 24 Days
240

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics