Evaluating the Optimal Alccofine-1203 Replacement Ratio in M20 Grade Concrete

Year : 2025 | Volume : 13 | Special Issue 04 | Page : 294 299
    By

    Hanumesh B M,

  • Harish B A,

  • Swapna Channagoudar,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, GM University -Davanagere, Karnataka, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, GM University -Davanagere, Karnataka, India
  3. Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, SKSVMACET-Laxmeshwara, Visvesvaraya, Technological University-Belagavi, Karnataka, India

Abstract

The primary objective of this research is to investigate the potential of partially replacing cement with Alccofine 1203 in M20 grade control concrete and to evaluate the resulting effects on the mechanical properties of the concrete. Alccofine 1203, a high-performance mineral admixture known for its ultrafine particle size and high reactivity, was used as a partial cement substitute at varying replacement levels of 5%, 10%, and 15% by weight of cement. Both fresh and hardened properties of the modified concrete mixes, along with the control mix, were evaluated through a series of laboratory tests. To assess the mechanical performance, a total of 72 concrete specimens—comprising 150 × 150 × 150 mm cubes for compressive strength tests and 150 mm diameter × 300 mm height cylinders for split tensile strength tests—were cast and cured. The specimens were tested at curing ages of 7, 14, and 28 days. The experimental results revealed that a 10% replacement of cement with Alccofine 1203 yielded the most favorable results in terms of both compressive and split tensile strength. Strength values improved significantly up to this optimum dosage, beyond which a decline in performance was observed. The study concludes that incorporating Alccofine 1203 in M20 grade concrete not only enhances its mechanical properties but also presents a sustainable alternative to conventional cement. This indicates its potential for broader applications in the construction industry, especially where improved strength and durability are desired.

Keywords: Alccofine 1203, M20 grade concrete, compressive strength (CS), split tensile strength (ST), cement replacement, mineral admixture, mechanical properties.

[This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites (jopc)]

aWQ6MjE1NDQzfGZpbGVuYW1lOjdiNDRhODE3LWZpLmF2aWZ8c2l6ZTp0aHVtYm5haWw=
How to cite this article:
Hanumesh B M, Harish B A, Swapna Channagoudar. Evaluating the Optimal Alccofine-1203 Replacement Ratio in M20 Grade Concrete. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(04):294-299.
How to cite this URL:
Hanumesh B M, Harish B A, Swapna Channagoudar. Evaluating the Optimal Alccofine-1203 Replacement Ratio in M20 Grade Concrete. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(04):294-299. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2025/view=215447


Browse Figures

References

  1. Kavitha S, Kala T F. “Evaluation of strength behavior of self-compacting concrete using Alccofine and GGBS as partial replacement of cement”. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016;9(22):1-5.
  2. Pawar M S, Saoji A C. “Performance of self-compacting concrete by using alccofine”. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications. 2013;3(4):190-192.
  3. Kumar L J S, Bhuvaneshwari P, Eswar M, Subramanian K A. “Strength characteristics of arccosine-based lightweight concrete”. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology. 2019;10(1):268-275.
  4. Gayathri K, Ravichandran K, Saravanan J. “Durability and cementing efficiency of Alccofine in concretes”. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT). 2016 May;5(5).
  5. Sagar B, Sivakumar M. “An experimental and analytical study on alccofine based high strength concrete”. International Journal of Engineering. 2020; 33:530-538.
  6. Kavyateja, Bode Venkata, J. Guru Jawahar and Chundupalli Sashidhar. “Effectiveness of alccofine and fly ash on mechanical properties of ternary blended self-compacting concrete.” Materials Today: Proceedings 33 (2020): 73-79.
  7. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 10262:2009 – Guidelines for concrete mix design proportioning. New Delhi: BIS; 2009.
  8. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 456:2000 – Plain and reinforced concrete – Code of practice. New Delhi: BIS; 2000.
  9. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 2386 (Part 3):1963 – Methods of test for aggregates for concrete: Part 3 Specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking. New Delhi: BIS; 1963.
  10. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 383:1970 – Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete. New Delhi: BIS; 1970.
  11. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 516:1959 – Method of tests for strength of concrete. New Delhi: BIS; 1959.
  12. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 5816:1999 – Splitting tensile strength of concrete – Method of test. New Delhi: BIS; 1999.
  13. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 8112:1989 – Specification for 43 grade ordinary Portland cement. New Delhi: BIS; 1989.

Special Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 13
Special Issue 04
Received 26/07/2024
Accepted 25/11/2024
Published 01/07/2025
Publication Time 340 Days



My IP

PlumX Metrics