Parametric Studies of Natural Dyes in Dye Sensitized Solar Cells

Year : 2025 | Volume : 13 | Special Issue 03 | Page : 121-132
    By

    Rupesh Shelke,

  • Pramod Walke,

  • Vivek Khond,

  • Nilesh Nirwan,

  1. Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, G H Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur, Maharshtra, India
  2. Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, G H Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur, Maharshtra, India
  3. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, G H Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur, Maharshtra, India
  4. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, G H Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur, Maharshtra, India

Abstract

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_187719’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

Natural dyes used in dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are low cost viable substitute to high cost ruthenium dyes because of its easy availability and no environment threat. Parametric studies of natural dyes in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are essential for optimizing the performance of these renewable energy devices. One kind of thin-film solar cell called a DSSC uses organic dyes to absorb sunlight and turn it into electrical energy. Natural dyes, derived from plant sources or other organic materials, have gained attention as potential replacements for synthetic dyes due to their environmental benefits and lower cost. This paper discusses the appearance and feasibility of natural dyes in DSSCs. Cobalt sulphate and graphite are the two counter electrodes and natural dyes were used in the DSSCs. The sensitizing dye is one of the crucial components that is essential to the device’s functionality. Natural colors made from plants are becoming more and more popular due to their abundance, low toxicity, and environmental friendliness. These natural dyes are widely accessible and at reasonable price anywhere in the world. Due to their modest energy conversion efficiency and low cost compared to ruthenium dyes, natural dyes have been investigated for usage in DSSCs. Because of its affordability, ease of manufacturing, and promise for sustainability, DSSCs made from natural dyes have become a viable substitute for traditional silicon-based photovoltaic systems in future.

Keywords: Natural dyes, dye, sensitized solar cells, cobalt sulphate, graphite.

[This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites (jopc)]

aWQ6MjA5NTkyfGZpbGVuYW1lOjVhNDdjZTg3LWZpLXBuZy53ZWJwfHNpemU6dGh1bWJuYWls
How to cite this article:
Rupesh Shelke, Pramod Walke, Vivek Khond, Nilesh Nirwan. Parametric Studies of Natural Dyes in Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(03):121-132.
How to cite this URL:
Rupesh Shelke, Pramod Walke, Vivek Khond, Nilesh Nirwan. Parametric Studies of Natural Dyes in Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(03):121-132. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2025/view=0



Browse Figures

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_187719’);});Edit

References

  1. Chiba, A. Islam, Y. Watanabe, R. Komiya, N. Koide, and L. Han, “Dye-sensitized solar cells with conversion efficiency of 11.1%,” Japanese J. Appl. Physics, Part 2 Lett., vol. 45, no. 24–28, pp. 23–26, 2006, doi: 10.1143/JJAP.45.L638.
  2. Calogero, J. H. Yum, A. Sinopoli, G. Di Marco, M. Grätzel, and M. K. Nazeeruddin, “Anthocyanins and betalains as light-harvesting pigments for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Sol. Energy, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 1563–1575, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2012.02.018.
  3. Wongcharee, V. Meeyoo, and S. Chavadej, “Dye-sensitized solar cell using natural dyes extracted from rosella and blue pea flowers,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 566–571, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.11.005.
  4. S. Roy, P. Balraju, M. Kumar, and G. D. Sharma, “Dye-sensitized solar cell based on Rose Bengal dye and nanocrystalline TiO2,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 909–913, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.02.022.
  5. G. Garcia, A. Sarto Polo, and N. Y. Murakami Iha, “Fruit extracts and ruthenium polypyridinic dyes for sensitization of TiO2 in photoelectrochemical solar cells,” J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem., vol. 160, no. 1–2, pp. 87–91, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(03)00225-9.
  6. J. Cherepy, G. P. Smestad, M. Grätzel, and J. Z. Zhang, “Ultrafast electron injection: Implications for a photoelectrochemical cell utilizing an anthocyanin dye-sensitized TiO2 nanocrystalline electrode,” J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 101, no. 45, pp. 9342–9351, 1997, doi: 10.1021/jp972197w.
  7. Hao, J. Wu, Y. Huang, and J. Lin, “Natural dyes as photosensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cell,” Sol. Energy, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 209–214, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2005.05.009.
  8. N. Nandanwar, P. V. Walke, V. P. Kalbande, and M. Mohan, “Performance improvement of vapour compression refrigeration system using phase change material and thermoelectric generator,” Int. J. Thermofluids, vol. 18, no. April, p. 100352, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100352.
  9. Agrawal et al., “Evaluation of tensile property of SLA 3D printed NextDent biocompatible Class I material for making surgical guides for implant surgery,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 72, no. xxxx, pp. 1231–1235, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.288.
  10. S. Shelke, P. Walke, V. Khond, and N. Nirwan, “Degradation performance of graphite as a counter electrode in dye sensitized solar cells,” Mater. Today Proc., no. xxxx, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.206.
  11. P. Kalbande, P. V. Walke, and C. V. M. Kriplani, “Advancements in Thermal Energy Storage System by Applications of Nanofluid Based Solar Collector: A Review,” Environ. Clim. Technol., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 310–340, 2020, doi: 10.2478/rtuect-2020-0018.
  12. Gondane and R. S. Shelke, “Comprehensive review on adsorption heat and mass exchange,” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 103–111, 2013.
  13. S. Shelke, S. B. Thombre, and S. R. Patrikar, “Status and Perspectives of Dyes Used in Dye Sensitized Solar Cells,” Int. J. Renew. Energy Resour., vol. 3, pp. 54–61, 2013.
  14. A. Jibhakate, N. W. Nirwan, and K. S. Rambhad, “Enhancing the effectiveness of green technology in manufacturing industry,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 47, no. xxxx, pp. 4298–4305, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.592.
  15. P. Kalbande, P. V. Walke, K. Rambhad, Y. Nandanwar, and M. Mohan, “Performance evaluation of energy storage system coupled with flat plate solar collector using hybrid nanofluid of CuO+Al2O3/water,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1913, no. 1, pp. 0–5, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1913/1/012067.
  16. P. Kalbande, P. V. Walke, and R. Shelke, “Aluminum‐based thermal storage system with solar collector using nanofluid,” Energy Storage, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 1–7, 2019, doi: 10.1002/est2.99.
  17. Pitale, P. Walke, and V. Khond, “Effect of nanofluid additive and after treatment devices on engine emission – A review,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1913, no. 1, pp. 0–6, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1913/1/012085.
  18. S. Shelke, S. B. Thombre, and S. R. Patrikar, “Cobalt sulphate as an alternative counter electrode material in dye sensitized solar cells,” J. Sol. Energy Eng. Trans. ASME, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 1–6, 2014, doi: 10.1115/1.4027574.
  19. S. Shelke, S. B. Thombre, and S. R. Patrikar, “Comparative Performance of Dye Sensitized Solar Cells using Two Electrolytes,” Int. J. Res. Sci. Adv. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 131–136, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.668.1328&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  20. S. Patil, R. R. Arakerimath, and P. V. Walke, “Thermoelectric materials and heat exchangers for power generation – A review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 95, no. October 2017, pp. 1–22, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.003.
  21. S. Tajamul and W. Wei, “Technoeconomic Analysis of Dye Sensitized Solar Cells,” 2022.
  22. Bera, D. Sengupta, S. Roy, and K. Mukherjee, “Research into dye-sensitized solar cells: A review highlighting progress in India,” JPhys Energy, vol. 3, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.1088/2515-7655/abff6c.
  23. Parasuraman and M. Ramakrishnan, “A Review on Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs), Materials and Applications,” Iran. J. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.22068/ijmse.2994.
  24. A. Castillo-Robles, E. Rocha-Rangel, J. A. Ramírez-De-león, F. C. Caballero-Rico, and E. N. Armendáriz-Mireles, “Advances on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) nanostructures and natural colorants: A review,” J. Compos. Sci., vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1–25, 2021, doi: 10.3390/jcs5110288.
  25. Rahman et al., “Research on dye sensitized solar cells: recent advancement toward the various constituents of dye sensitized solar cells for efficiency enhancement and future prospects,” RSC Adv., vol. 13, no. 28, pp. 19508–19529, 2023, doi: 10.1039/d3ra00903c.
  26. Djibrilla, A. Sanda, M. Badu, J. A. M. Awudza, and N. Boadi, “Development of TiO2-based dye-sensitized solar cells using natural dyes extracted from some plant-based materials Nanocrystal Synthesis View project Dye-sensitized solar cells View project,” Chem. Int., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4018012
  27. R. Narayan, “Review: Dye sensitized solar cells based on natural photosensitizers,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 208–215, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.148.
  28. F. Ole, G. C. Nonato Santos, and R. V Quiroga, “Fabrication and Characterization of Dye Sensitized Solar Cell Using Nanostructured TiO 2 Photoelectrode,” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1–7, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijser.org
Special Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 13
Special Issue 03
Received 12/11/2024
Accepted 13/12/2024
Published 08/04/2025
Publication Time 147 Days
111

[first_name] [last_name]

My IP

PlumX Metrics