Open Access
Omkar Sakpal,
Shivsagar Tewary,
Shubha Joshi,
Ajay Gaikwad,
Abhijeet Kore,
- Student, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, School of Dental Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad, Maharashtra, India
- Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, School of Dental Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad, Maharashtra, India
- Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, School of Dental Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad, Maharashtra, India
- Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, School of Dental Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad, Maharashtra, India
- Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, School of Dental Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, Karad, Maharashtra, India
Abstract
Traditional articulating papers, a mainstay in occlusal analysis, often exhibit limitations in consistency and difficulty with quantitative data analysis. This study explores the development of novel articulating papers utilizing advanced polymeric materials. These novel papers aim to address the shortcomings of traditional options by potentially improving: (1) sensitivity and resolution for capturing occlusal contacts, (2) consistency and reproducibility of contact readings, and (3) durability and reusability. The successful development of such polymeric articulating papers could offer significant advantages for dentists by providing a more reliable and quantitative tool for occlusal analysis, ultimately contributing to improved diagnosis and treatment planning of occlusal disorders. This study is further aimed to evaluate and compare the reproducibility of five different articulating papers and the T-Scan Occlusal Analysis System in assessing occlusal contacts. Occlusal analysis plays a crucial role in diagnosing and managing occlusal disorders in dentistry, and reliable assessment tools are essential for accurate treatment planning. Five commonly used articulating papers with varying thicknesses and sensitivities were selected, along with the T-Scan system, which offers digital occlusal analysis. A series of occlusal contacts were recorded using each method on a standardized dental model. The reproducibility of occlusal contact recordings was assessed by repeating measurements multiple times. Results indicated significant differences in reproducibility among the different articulating papers and the T-Scan system. Understanding the reproducibility of occlusal analysis tools is vital for clinicians to make informed decisions regarding their selection and use in clinical practice.
Keywords: Polymeric materials, occlusal analysis, articulating paper, T-Scan system, occlusal contacts, dental model, occlusal disorders.
[This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites (jopc)]
Omkar Sakpal, Shivsagar Tewary, Shubha Joshi, Ajay Gaikwad, Abhijeet Kore. Development of Novel Polymeric Articulating Papers for Enhanced Occlusal Contact Assessment in Dentistry. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2024; 13(01):1004-1011.
Omkar Sakpal, Shivsagar Tewary, Shubha Joshi, Ajay Gaikwad, Abhijeet Kore. Development of Novel Polymeric Articulating Papers for Enhanced Occlusal Contact Assessment in Dentistry. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2024; 13(01):1004-1011. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2024/view=188674
References
- Ferro KJ, Morgano SM, Driscoll CF, Freilich MA, Guckes AD, Knoernschild KL. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May;117(5S):e1-05.
- Amin K, Vere J, Thanabalan N, Elmougy A. Occlusal concepts and considerations in fixed prosthodontics. Primary dental journal. 2019 Sep;8(3):20-7.
- Pokorny PH, Wiens JP, Litvak H. Occlusion for fixed prosthodontics: a historical perspective of the gnathological influence. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2008 Apr 1;99(4):299-313.
- Owens S, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, Palmer L, English J. Masticatory performance and areas of occlusal contact and near contact in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2002 Jun 1;121(6):602-9.
- Afrashtehfar KI, Qadeer S. Computerized occlusal evaluation as an alternative occlusal indicator. CRANIO®. 2016 Jan 2;34(1):52-7.
- Saraçoǧlu A, Özpinar B. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity.J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:522-6.
- Schelb E, Kaiser DA, Brukl CE. Thickness and marking characteristics of occlusal registration strips. J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Jul 1;54(1):122-6.
- Reiber T, Fuhr K, Hartmann H, Leicher D. Recording pattern of occlusal indicators. I. Influence of indicator thickness, pressure, and surface morphology. DtschZahnarztl Z 1989; 44:90-3
- Reza Moini M, Neff PA. Reproducibility of occlusal contacts utilizing a computerized instrument. Quintessence Int 1991;22: 357–60.
- Panigrahi D, Satpathy A, Patil A, Patel G. Occlusion and occlusal indicating materials. International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences. 2015;1(4):23-6.
- Howard W. Makofsky(2000)The Influence of Forward Head Posture on Dental Occlusion,CRANIO®,18:1,30-39
- Millstein P, Maya A. An evaluation of occlusal contact marking indicators: A descriptive quantitative method. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2001 Sep 1;132(9):1280-6.
- DeLong R, Ko CC, Anderson GC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts. J. Prosthet Dent. 2002 Dec 1;88(6):622-30.
- Davies S, Al-Ani Z, Jeremiah H, Winston D, Smith P. Reliability of recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks using transparent acetate sheet. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Nov 1;94(5):458-61.
- Carey JP, Craig M, Kerstein RB, Radke J. Determining a relationship between applied occlusal load and Carbon paper mark area. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2007;1:1.

Journal of Polymer & Composites
| Volume | 13 |
| Special Issue | 01 |
| Received | 02/04/2024 |
| Accepted | 24/07/2024 |
| Published | 10/12/2024 |
Login
PlumX Metrics