Digital Modules of the Green Buildings to Study Protection of Air Quality

Open Access

Year : 2025 | Volume : 13 | Special Issue 01 | Page : 838 846
    By

    Natalia Shushunova,

  • Dmitry Korolchenko,

  • Tatiana Shushunova,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Integrated Safety in Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, Russia
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Integrated Safety in Construction, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Moscow, Russia
  3. Professor, State University of Management, Ryazan Ave., 99, 109542, Moscow, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The aims of this study are to simulate air flows inside and around multi-storey green building spaces together with the distribution of concentrations of harmful substances and microorganisms to increase the sustainability of design solutions for green modules. Among the objectives of the study are assessment of bioclimatic comfort, risk analysis of bioclimatic eco-safety in the framework of aeration and pollution modeling, as well as eco-optimization of building design, which corresponds to Sustainable Development Goal 11 (SDG 11), sustainable cities and communities, and is essential for promoting healthy urban communities. The methodology is based on sequential Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) of air flows around and inside buildings with the determination of aggregate stagnant air zones, after which the concentrations of harmful substances and microorganisms are simulated based on the database of air samples and concentration calculations taking into account the influence of air flow directions and green modules. The data obtained on the areas and forms of stagnant air zones with the accumulation of concentrations of harmful substances and microorganisms allow us to consider various design approaches to building facades, floor plans and to reconsider the role of green spaces depending on the technology of the cultivation green modules to improve bioclimatic comfort and bioclimatic eco-safety.

Keywords: Digital model, modular system, ecology, green buildings, air quality

[This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites (jopc)]

aWQ6MTk5NzYzfGZpbGVuYW1lOjdjN2E0OTA1LWZpLXBuZy53ZWJwfHNpemU6dGh1bWJuYWls
How to cite this article:
Natalia Shushunova, Dmitry Korolchenko, Tatiana Shushunova. Digital Modules of the Green Buildings to Study Protection of Air Quality. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2024; 13(01):838-846.
How to cite this URL:
Natalia Shushunova, Dmitry Korolchenko, Tatiana Shushunova. Digital Modules of the Green Buildings to Study Protection of Air Quality. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2024; 13(01):838-846. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2024/view=188627


Browse Figures

References

  1. Htet A, Sui A, Theingi B, et al. Smart Buildings in the Age of Internet Technology: Civil Engineering’s Role in Shaping an Energy-Efficient Future. Journal of Technology Innovations and Energy. 2023; 2. 8–19p. doi:56556/jtie.v2i2.535.
  2. Kasumu R. Senior secondary school students’ perception of smart classroom: attitude and challenges, International Journal of Trendy Research in Engineering and Technology, 2023; 7 (3): pp.1–15. doi:54473/IJTRET.2023.7303
  3. May Tzuc, Torres O, Cruz M, , et al. Feasibility of the adaptive thermal comfort model under warm sub-humid climate conditions: cooling energy savings in campeche, Mexico. 2023; 13. 120p. doi:22320/07190700.2023.13.01.10.
  4. May Tzuc, Hernández-Pérez O, Castro I, et al. Modeling the effect of roof coatings materials on the building thermal temperature variations based on an artificial intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2022; 2180. 012014. doi:1088/1742–6596/2180/1/012014.
  5. Zhong W, Schroeder T, Bekkering J. Designing with nature: Advancing three-dimensional green spaces in architecture through frameworks for biophilic design and sustainability. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2023; 2095–2635, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.03.001
  6. Gunawardena K, Steemers K. Living walls in indoor environments, Environ., 2019;148, pp. 478–487, doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.11.014
  7. Yi L, Liangliang R, Chunyan Z. Application analysis on thermal insulation of building surface greening-based on U-wert simulation. – 2019 Int. Conf. Smart Grid Electr. Autom. ICSGEA, 2019, pp. 63–67, 10.1109/ICSGEA.2019.00023
  8. Bandaranayake S, Kahandawa T, Gamage A. Comparative Study to Assess the Thermal Behaviour of Sandwich Roof Panels with Coconut Fibre as an Alternative Core Material to Polyurethane, Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 23, DOI- 10.56748/ejse.234153
  9. Bevilacqua P. The effectiveness of green roofs in reducing building energy consumptions across different climates. A summary of literature results. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021;151, 111523.
  10. Bevilacqua P, Bruno R, Arcuri N. Green roofs in a Mediterranean climate: Energy performances based on in-situ experimental data. Renewable Energy, 2020; 152, pp.1414–1430.
  11. Choudhury A, Greener approaches in textile industry, RP Cur. Tr. Eng. Tech. 2023; 2, pp. 87–97.
  12. Zhu J, Feng J, Lu J, et al. A review of the influence of courtyard geometry and orientation on microclimate, Building and Environment, 2023;236,110269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110269
  13. Abdulbasit A, Norhati I, Sabarinah A, et al. Courtyard Design Variants and Microclimate Performance, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013;101, pp.170–180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.190
  14. Xiaoshan Y, Lihua Z, Bruse M, et al. Evaluation of a microclimate model for predicting the thermal behavior of different ground surfaces. Building and Environment, 2013;60, Pp. 93-104,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.008.
  15. Yuce B, Nielsen P, Wargocki P. The use of Taguchi, ANOVA, and GRA methods to optimize CFD analyses of ventilation performance in buildings. Building and Environment, 2022; 225, 109587, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109587.
  16. Ismail N, Ouahrani D, Modelling of cooling radiant cubicle for an office room to test cooling performance, thermal comfort and energy savings in hot climates. Energy, 2022; 244, 123185, 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123185
  17. Nielsen P, Fifty years of CFD for room air distribution. Environ., 2015; 91, pp. 78-90, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.035
  18. Collaço F, Simoes S, Dias L, et al. The dawn of urban energy planning – Synergies between energy and urban planning for São Paulo (Brazil) megacity, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019;215, pp. 458-479, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.013.
  19. Ágota S, Wind comfort in a public urban space—Case study within Dublin Docklands, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2013; 2, Issue 1, pages 50-66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2012.12.002
  20. Kuznetsov S. Deformation of the Air Flow in a Development Under the Influence of a High-Rise Building, East European Conf. On Wind Engin. “2nd EECWE’98”, 1998; 2. Prague, Czech Republic, pp 495–502.
  21. Singh H. High-energy electron irradiation induced effects in LED chips, RP Materials: Proceedings, 2022;1, Part 1. pp. 29–32.
  22. Clarke J. A vision for building performance simulation: a position paper prepared on behalf of the IBPSA Board, Journal of Building Performance Simulation. 2015. No. 8(2). pp. 39–43. DOI:10.1080/19401493.2015.1007699.
  23. Lauster M., et al. Low order thermal network models for dynamic simulations of buildings on city district scale, Environ. 2014. 73. pp. 223–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.01
  24. Saini G, Surface profile construction using two-dimensional optical fiber array, RP Materials: Proceedings Vol. 1, Part 1 (2022) pp. 33–36.
  25. Robinson D., et al. CitySim e comprehensive micro simulation of resource flows for sustainable urban planning, Proceedings of Building Simulation 2009: Glasgow, 2009.
  26. Fonseca JA, Schlueter A. Integrated model for characterization of spatiotemporal building energy consumption patterns in neighborhoods and city districts, energy. 2015; 142. C. pp.247–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.068
  27. Korol O, Shushunova N, Lopatkin D, et al. Application of High-tech Solutions in Ecodvelopment. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 251, p. 06002). EDP Sciences.
  28. Esaulov G. Sustainable architecture: from approaches to strategy of development. Vestnik of Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building. English version appendix, 2014; (2), pp. 5–17.
  29. Krasheninnikov A. Structure of social space in the pedestrian realm. Architecture and modern information technologies 2021, (4), p.21.
  30. Cherkina V, Shushunova N, Zubkova J. Application of BIM-technologies in tasks of quality management and labor safety. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018; 251, p. 06004. EDP Sciences.
  31. Varoudis, T., Psarra, S. 2014. Beyond two dimensions: Architecture through three-dimensional visibility graph analysis. The Journal of Space Syntax 5(1) pp. 90–108.
  32. Shushunova N, Korol E, Luzay E, et al. Impact of the Innovative Green Wall Modular Systems on the Urban Air. Sustainability (Switzerland), 2023, 15(12), 9732.
  33. Korol E. and Shushunova N. Assessment of the Impact of Greening Technologies for Residential Roof Coverings on the Environmental Safety of the City of Moscow”, 2023, academia. Architecture and construction, (2), pp. 153–159. doi: 10.22337/2077-9038-2023-2-153-159.
  34. Kim J, Lee S, Kang J. Temperature Reduction Effects of Rooftop Garden Arrangements: A Case Study of Seoul National University. Sustainability, 2020; 12, 6032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156032.
  35. Dunichkin I, Naboni E, et al. Features of assessment of bioclimatic comfort for modern residential buildings in hot-dry climates. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 365 (2), p. 022042. IOP Publishing.

Special Issue Open Access Original Research
Volume 13
Special Issue 01
Received 26/07/2024
Accepted 05/10/2024
Published 20/11/2024


Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics