THE EFFECTS OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION ON THE TURNING PROCESS FOR VARIOUS WORK-PIECE MATERIALS

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : June 11, 2024 at 12:01 pm | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume : [else] Volume :[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : | Page : –

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

n

n

Rajeev Sharma, Vikas Sharma, Kamal Sharma

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Reseach Scholar, Professor, Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering, GLA University. Mathura, Department of Mechanical Engineering. GLA University, Mathura, Department of Mechanical Engineering, GLA University, Mathura Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh India, India, India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nThe study modified its goal to energy-intensive titanium alloys, contrasting traditional and high-speed machining processes. According to the study, a solution is needed to reduce or optimize energy use. So, a machined component energy footprint model was created. Several cutting speeds were used to calculate (k). Material removal rates were compared to cutting speeds for a range of materials and levels of detail. A strategy for selecting optimal cutting conditions was then created and tested. An optimal tool life equation that meets the most minor energy conditions was constructed. From this, each material’s specific energy was determined. Machinability is the ease with which a material can be cut while maintaining a high standard of tool life and finished product quality. Most electricity went to non-cutting processes. Most energy goes to the spindle, control computer, and cooling fans. Non-cutting tasks require the most power on a CNC lathe. Cutting used 13 to 36% of the machining energy for various workpiece materials. When comparing the required energy for various technological alloys for a given volume of product removal, machining at a higher speed or with a greater volumetric removal rate results in lower energy usage. Energy requirements are also affected by the nature of the material used. A machine shop’s carbon footprint can be determined with this work if its electricity source is known. Carbon emissions from industry can be lowered by switching to more energy-efficient production methods

n

n

n

Keywords: Energy Consumption, Turning Process, workpiece, materials (titanium alloys), optimal tool life, cutting, machinability, CNC lathe.

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Rajeev Sharma, Vikas Sharma, Kamal Sharma. THE EFFECTS OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION ON THE TURNING PROCESS FOR VARIOUS WORK-PIECE MATERIALS. Journal of Polymer and Composites. June 11, 2024; ():-.

n

How to cite this URL: Rajeev Sharma, Vikas Sharma, Kamal Sharma. THE EFFECTS OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION ON THE TURNING PROCESS FOR VARIOUS WORK-PIECE MATERIALS. Journal of Polymer and Composites. June 11, 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=June 11, 2024/view=0

nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n[if 992 not_equal=”Open Access”]

[/if 992]n[if 992 not_equal=”Open Access”]


n


n

n[/if 992]nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  • Zhong, Q., Tang, R., & Peng, T. (2017). Decision rules for energy consumption minimization during material removal process in turning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1819-1827.
  • Dambhare, S., Deshmukh, S., Borade, A., Digalwar, A., & Phate, M. (2015). Sustainability issues in turning process: A study in Indian machining Industry. Procedia CIRP, 26, 379-384.
  • Camposeco-Negrete, C. (2015). Optimization of cutting parameters using Response Surface Method for minimizing energy consumption and maximizing cutting quality in turning of AISI 6061 T6 aluminum. Journal of cleaner production, 91, 109-117.
  • Gutowski, T., Dahmus, J., & Thiriez, A. (2006, May). Electrical energy requirements for manufacturing processes. In 13th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering(Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 623-638).
  • Rajemi MF and Mativenga PT, Machinability analysis from energy footprint considerations. Journal of Machine Engineering, 2008; 8 (2): 106 – 13.
  • Uhlmann E and Koenig J, Key Technologies for Sustainable Manufacturing. Journal of Machine Engineering, 2008; 8 (1): 3 – 10.
  • Kumar, R., Bilga, P. S., & Singh, S. (2019, March). Optimization of Turning Parameters Using Taguchi Method for Reducing Active Cutting Energy. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advancements in Engineering & Technology (ICAET-2019), Sangrur, India (pp. 15-16).
  • Okokpujie, I. P., Salawu, E. Y., Nwoke, O. N., Okonkwo, U. C., Ohijeagbon, I. O., & Okokpujie, K. (2018, July). Effects of process parameters on vibration frequency in turning operations of perspex material. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2, pp. 4-6).
  • Jain, H., Tripathi, J., Bharilya, R., Jain, S., & Kumar, A. (2015). Optimisation and evaluation of machining parameters for turning operation of Inconel-625. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2(4-5), 2306-2313.
  • Mori, M., Fujishima, M., Inamasu, Y., Oda, Y., 2011. A study on energy efficiency improvement for machine tools. CIRP Ann -Manuf Technol 60, 145-148. National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2013. China Energy Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press.
  • Newman, S. T., Nassehi, A., Imani-Asrai, R., & Dhokia, V. (2012). Energy efficient process planning for CNC machining. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 5(2), 127-136.
  • Chaturvedi, R., Sharma, A., Sharma, K., & Saraswat, M. (2022). Tribological behaviour of multi-walled carbon nanotubes reinforced AA 7075 nano-composites. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 1-13.
  • Rajemi, M.F., Mativenga, P.T., Aramcharoen, A., 2010. Sustainable machining: selection of optimum turning conditions based on minimum energy considerations. J Clean Prod 18, 1059-1065.
  • Sharma, A., Chaturvedi, R., Sharma, K., & Saraswat, M. (2022). Force evaluation and machining parameter optimization in milling of aluminium burr composite based on response surface method. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 1-22.
  • Velchev, S., Kolev, I., Ivanov, K., & Gechevski, S. (2014). Empirical models for specific energy consumption and optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing energy consumption during turning. Journal of cleaner production, 80, 139-149.
  • Widhiarso, W., Rosid, I. A., & Ernawati, R. (2023). Multi-objective optimization model of cutting parameters for a sustainable multi-pass turning process. Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri, 7(1), 1-14.
  • Çakıroğlu, R., & Günay, M. (2023). Analysis of surface roughness and energy consumption in turning of C17500 copper alloy under different machining environments and modellings with response surface method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 237(2), 207-219.
  • Moradnazhad, M., & Unver, H. O. (2017). Energy consumption characteristics of turn-mill machining. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91, 1991-2016.
  • Begovic, E., Plancic, I., Ekinovic, S., & Mizdrak, V. (2022). ON ONE ASPECT OF SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING Power Consumption vs Productivity. Journal of Sustainable Technologies and Materials, 2(2), 1-8.
  • ÇAKIR, A. K. (2021). Investigation of the Exergy Analysis and Efficiency in the Turning of DIN 1.2367 Material. Journal of Brilliant Engineering, 4, 1-4.
  • Xie, N., Zhou, J., & Zheng, B. (2018). An energy-based modeling and prediction approach for surface roughness in turning. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 96, 2293-2306.
  • Jaffery, S. H. I., Younas, M., Khan, M., & Ali, L. (2020, January). Energy consumption analysis in turning Ti-6Al-4V alloy. In 2020 IEEE 11th International Conference on Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing Technologies (ICMIMT)(pp. 18-21). IEEE.
  • Pelegrino, D. H., dos Santos, R. G., & Coelho, R. T. (2019). Experimental evaluation of energy consumption in machine tools: a case study for a two-spindle turning center. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 41, 1-9.
  • Thamrin, I. (2019, September). Analysis of the effect of the cutting speed on specific cutting energy in turning process. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering(Vol. 620, No. 1, p. 012117). IOP Publishing.
  • Unyanin, A. N., & Finageev, P. R. (2021, August). Research of the Influence of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of the Workpiece Material on the Temperature Field of the Turning Process. In Materials Science Forum(Vol. 1037, pp. 300-308). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
  • Azmi, A. I., Syahmi, A. Z., Naquib, M., Lih, T. C., Mansor, A. F., & Khalil, A. N. M. (2017, October). Effects of machining conditions on the specific cutting energy of carbon fibre reinforced polymer composites. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series(Vol. 908, No. 1, p. 012053). IOP Publishing.
  • Mahrous, A. B. (2023). A study of surface roughness and material removal rate for optimal parametric combination in turning of GFRP composites.  Engineering Research Journal, 46(2), 213-223.
  • Erenkov, O., Yavorskii, D., & Yavorskaya, E. (2019). The polymeric materials turning after workpiece processing with surface-active substances. In MATEC Web of Conferences(Vol. 298, p. 00073). EDP Sciences.

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””][else]Ahead of Print[/if 424] Open Access Original Research

n

n

n

n

n

Journal of Polymer and Composites

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2321–2810[/if 344]

n

n

n

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424]
Received December 12, 2022
Accepted May 7, 2024
Published June 11, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n function myFunction2() {n var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);n if (x.style.display === “block”) {n x.style.display = “none”;n }n else { x.style.display = “Block”; }n }n document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(-1);n });n document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {n changeSlides(1);n });n var slideIndex = 1;n showSlides(slideIndex);n function changeSlides(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex += n));n }n function currentSlide(n) {n showSlides((slideIndex = n));n }n function showSlides(n) {n var i;n var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);n var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);n if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }n if (n (item.style.display = “none”));n Array.from(dots).forEach(n item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n );n slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;n dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n }n”}]