Sahul Muhique,
Kalyan Kalita,
Kalyan Das,
Abstract
This study investigates the hydrodynamic behaviour of submerged offshore vehicles, including submarine hull and NACA aerofoils through simulation and fluid flow analysis, using ANSYS Fluent. The study models the interaction between fluid flow and offshore submerged vessels i.e. a Standard Submarine Model and various NACA profiles, simulating pressure distributions and drag forces that affect offshore operational stability. The analysis comprises of the study of multiple mesh profiles required to calculate the drag force and their coefficients in a pressure based solver. The inter-dependency on the variation of one data on the other is also studied with the help of tables and graphs. The error analysis between the data obtained is also investigated in order to ensure the validity of the report. The findings contribute to the optimization of offshore structures, aiding in the design of submerged energy platforms and deep-sea exploration vessels. Concurrence with the data obtained is generally agreed as accepted within the error margin of 10% which is quite within the range.
Keywords: Hydrodynamics, offshore engineering, submarine, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), NACA aerofoils
[This article belongs to Journal of Offshore Structure and Technology ]
Sahul Muhique, Kalyan Kalita, Kalyan Das. Analysis of Submarine Hydrodynamics and NACA Aerofoils Using Ansys Fluent. Journal of Offshore Structure and Technology. 2025; 02(02):48-55.
Sahul Muhique, Kalyan Kalita, Kalyan Das. Analysis of Submarine Hydrodynamics and NACA Aerofoils Using Ansys Fluent. Journal of Offshore Structure and Technology. 2025; 02(02):48-55. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joost/article=2025/view=0
References
1. Christopher Baker. Estimating Drag Forces on Submarine Hulls. Defence R&D Canada-Atlantic CR 2004–125. 2004.
2. Mackay M. The Standard Submarine Model: A Survey of Static Hydrodynamic Experiments and Semi-Empirical Predictions. Defence R&D Canada-Atlantic TR 2003–079. 2003.
3. Abdi Kukner. Investigation of Flow Distribution around a Submarine. Journal of Naval Science and Engineering (JNSE). 2016; 12(2): 1–26.
4. Molland AF, Turncock SR. Wind tunnel investigation of the influence of propeller loading on ship rudder performance‖. Technical report, Ship Science, Report No. 46. 1991.
5. Larsson L, Stern F, Visonneau M. Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics: An Assessment of the Gothenburg 2010 Workshop. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014.
6. Han KJ. Numerical optimization of hull/propeller/rudder configurations. Doctoral Thesis. Department of Shipping and Marine Technology. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology; 2008.
7. Kawabuchi M, Kubota M, Ishikawa S. Development of Technology to Estimate the Flow Field around Ship Hull Considering Wave Making and Propeller Rotating Effects. Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Tech Rev. 2016; 53(2): 53–57.
8. Da-Qing L. Investigation on Propeller-Rudder Interaction by Numerical Methods. Doctoral Thesis. Department of Shipping and Marine Technology. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology; 1994.
9. Sarentzen E, Mandel P. Naval architectural aspects of submarine design. SNAME Trans. 1960; 622–692.
10. Loid HP, Byström L. Hydrodynamic aspects of the design of the forward and aft bodies of the submarine. Symposium on Naval Submarines, London. 1983.

Journal of Offshore Structure and Technology
| Volume | 02 |
| Issue | 02 |
| Received | 15/04/2025 |
| Accepted | 19/05/2025 |
| Published | 21/05/2025 |
| Publication Time | 36 Days |
[first_name] [last_name]