A Survey on Intrusion Detection in Wireless Sensor Network

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume : 13 | Issue : 02 | Page : 51-56
    By

    Apoorva Patil,

  • Ankit Pandit,

  • Sanjeev Kumar Gupta,

  1. Research Scholar, Department of Electronics and Communication, Rabindranath Tagore University: Best University in Bhopal, Raisen, Madhya Pradesh, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Rabindranath Tagore University: Best University in Bhopal, Raisen, Madhya Pradesh, India
  3. Dean, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Rabindranath Tagore University: Best University in Bhopal, Raisen, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract

The Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) consist of sensor and vehicle infrastructure deployed either on land or in the sea over a selected acoustic field. Such networks are launched in the execution of joint tasks that include monitoring the environmental conditions and collecting measured data. WSNs operate based on an interactive communication among different nodes and ground stations, which provides for real-time data transmission and analysis. This research work gives a detailed study on the communication challenges faced by WSNs, with emphasis on signal interference, energy consumption, and data latency. It also summarizes the efforts of several researchers who contributed extensively toward optimizing WSN protocols, enhancing hardware designs, and increasing general network efficiency. Some in-depth discussions are also included on various architectures of WSNs and the techniques that can be used for detecting intruder nodes in such networks. Finally, a comprehensive list of the evaluation parameters is presented for comparing the performances of the different techniques and solutions proposed in the area.

Keywords: Energy optimization, clustering, WSN, routing, channel optimization

[This article belongs to Journal Of Network security ]

How to cite this article:
Apoorva Patil, Ankit Pandit, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta. A Survey on Intrusion Detection in Wireless Sensor Network. Journal Of Network security. 2025; 13(02):51-56.
How to cite this URL:
Apoorva Patil, Ankit Pandit, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta. A Survey on Intrusion Detection in Wireless Sensor Network. Journal Of Network security. 2025; 13(02):51-56. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jons/article=2025/view=207946


References

  1. Patel NR, Kumar S, Singh SK. Energy and collision aware WSN routing protocol for sustainable and intelligent IoT applications. IEEE Sens J. 2021 Apr 28; 21(22): 25282–92.
  2. Amutha J, Sharma S, Nagar J. WSN strategies based on sensors, deployment, sensing models, coverage and energy efficiency: Review, approaches and open issues. Wirel Pers Commun. 2020 Mar; 111(2): 1089–115.
  3. Bhushan B, Sahoo G. Requirements, protocols, and security challenges in wireless sensor networks: An industrial perspective. Handbook of computer networks and cyber security: principles and paradigms. Cham: Springer; 2020; 683–713.
  4. Praghash K, Ravi R. Energy consumption architecture for wireless sensor networks with different clusters. In 2017 IEEE Third International Conference on Science Technology Engineering & Management (ICONSTEM). 2017 Mar 23; 414–418.
  5. Bukhari SM, Zafar MH, Abou Houran M, Moosavi SK, Mansoor M, Muaaz M, Sanfilippo F. Secure and privacy-preserving intrusion detection in wireless sensor networks: Federated learning with SCNN-Bi-LSTM for enhanced reliability. Ad Hoc Netw. 2024 Mar 15; 155: 103407.
  6. Saleh HM, Marouane H, Fakhfakh A. Stochastic gradient descent intrusions detection for wireless sensor network attack detection system using machine learning. IEEE Access. 2024 Jan 2; 12: 3825– 36.
  7. Dhunna GS, Al-Anbagi I. A low power WSNs attack detection and isolation mechanism for critical smart grid applications. IEEE Sens J. 2019 Feb 28; 19(13): 5315–24.
  8. Berthelot D, Schumm T, Metz L. Began: Boundary equilibrium generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.10717. 2017 Mar 31.
  9. Yin C, Zhu Y, Fei J, He X. A deep learning approach for intrusion detection using recurrent neural networks. IEEE Access. 2017 Oct 12; 5: 21954–61.
  10. Kabir E, Hu J, Wang H, Zhuo G. A novel statistical technique for intrusion detection systems. Future Gener Comput Syst. 2018 Feb 1; 79: 303–18.
  11. 14Zhong J, Huang Z, Feng L, Du W, Li Y. A hyper-heuristic framework for lifetime maximization in wireless sensor networks with a mobile sink. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin. 2019 Dec 30; 7(1): 223– 36.
  12. 23Rajpoot V, Garg L, Alam MZ, Parashar V, Tapashetti P, Arjariya T. Analysis of machine learning based LEACH robust routing in the Edge Computing systems. Comput Electr Eng. 2021 Dec 1; 96: 107574.
  13. 24Lu Y, Liu M, Zhou J, Li Z. (Retracted) Intrusion Detection Method Based on Adaptive Clonal Genetic Algorithm and Backpropagation Neural Network. Secur Commun Netw. 2021; 2021(1): 9938586.
  14. Park C, Lee J, Kim Y, Park JG, Kim H, Hong D. An enhanced AI-based network intrusion detection system using generative adversarial networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022 Oct 3; 10(3): 2330–45.
  15. Al Mazaideh M, Levendovszky J. A multi-hop routing algorithm for WSNs based on compressive sensing and multiple objective genetic algorithm. J Commun Netw. 2021 Apr 16; 23(2): 138–47.
  16. Zhu J, Chen Y, Sun X, Wu J, Liu Z, Xu X. ECRKQ: Machine learning-based energy-efficient clustering and cooperative routing for mobile underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access. 2021 May 7; 9: 70843–55.
  17. Xiao X, Huang H, Wang W. Underwater wireless sensor networks: An energy-efficient clustering routing protocol based on data fusion and genetic algorithms. Appl Sci. 2020 Dec 30; 11(1): 312.
  18. 16Mahdavinejad MS, Rezvan M, Barekatain M, Adibi P, Barnaghi P, Sheth AP. Machine learning for Internet of Things data analysis: A survey. Digit Commun Netw. 2018 Aug 1; 4(3): 161–75.
  19. Liu J, Yang D, Lian M, Li M. Research on intrusion detection based on particle swarm optimization in IoT. IEEE Access. 2021 Mar 2; 9: 38254–68.
  20. Jin Y, Tian Z, Zhou M, Li Z, Zhang Z. A whole-home level intrusion detection system using WiFi- enabled IoT. In 2018 IEEE 14th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC). 2018 Jun 25; 494–499.
  21. Liu J, Yang D, Lian M, Li M. Research on intrusion detection based on particle swarm optimization in IoT. IEEE Access. 2021 Mar 2; 9: 38254–68.
  22. Zegzhda P, Kort S. Host-based intrusion detection system: model and design features. InComputer Network Security: Fourth International Conference on Mathematical Methods, Models, and Architectures for Computer Network Security, MMM-ACNS 2007 St. Petersburg, Russia, September 13–15, 2007 Proceedings 4. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2007; 340–345.
  23. Ou YJ, Lin Y, Zhang Y. The design and implementation of host-based intrusion detection system. In 2010 IEEE third international symposium on intelligent information technology and security informatics. 2010 Apr 2; 595–598.
  24. Mahdavinejad MS, Rezvan M, Barekatain M, Adibi P, Barnaghi P, Sheth AP. Machine learning for Internet of Things data analysis: A survey. Digit Commun Netw. 2018 Aug 1; 4(3): 161–75.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 13
Issue 02
Received 02/04/2025
Accepted 06/04/2025
Published 15/04/2025
Publication Time 13 Days
Total Visits: 38


My IP

PlumX Metrics