Dynamic Routing and Performance Assessment in IPv6 Networks

Year : 2024 | Volume : 12 | Issue : 03 | Page : 18-28
    By

    Yash Tanksale,

  • Aparna R. Lokhande,

  • Prathamesh Pavase,

  • Meghana Sobhage,

  1. Student, Department of Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering, Smt. Kashibai Navale College of Engineering (SKNCOE), Pune, Maharashtra, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering, Smt. Kashibai Navale College of Engineering (SKNCOE), Pune, Maharashtra, India
  3. Student, Department of Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering, Smt. Kashibai Navale College of Engineering (SKNCOE), Pune, Maharashtra, India
  4. Student, Department of Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering, Smt. Kashibai Navale College of Engineering (SKNCOE), Pune, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

In the fast-paced world of networking technologies and the growing demands of contemporary communication, it is crucial to thoroughly examine adaptive routing in IPv6 networks. This project undertakes a thorough analysis and evaluation of adaptive routing protocols, particularly OSPFv3 and Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)+, within the context of IPv6. Through meticulous scrutiny of network dynamics, traffic behavior, and routing protocol decisions, this study aims to elucidate the efficacy and adaptability of these protocols in dynamic IPv6 environments. By employing advanced methodologies and simulation tools, this research aims to provide valuable insights into the complex relationship between adaptive routing mechanisms and the performance metrics of IPv6 networks. The findings are expected to make meaningful contributions to the current discussions on IPv6 networking, offering practical insights for network administrators, researchers, and industry professionals. The choice of protocol, which is determined by certain network requirements such as scalability, policy complexity, and adaptability, becomes an important factor. OSPFv3 is appropriate for systems with frequent topology changes due to their quick convergence and effective route recalculations. On the other hand, BGP+ exhibits better flexibility, especially in large-scale implementations with a variety of routing strategies. Network architects and administrators can benefit from the practical advice provided by the highlighted trade-offs and concerns. Given the security issues that have been recognized, security measures must be strengthened to ensure that protocols are deployed effectively.

Keywords: Network adaptability, IPv6 infrastructure, protocol efficacy, dynamic environments

[This article belongs to Journal Of Network security ]

How to cite this article:
Yash Tanksale, Aparna R. Lokhande, Prathamesh Pavase, Meghana Sobhage. Dynamic Routing and Performance Assessment in IPv6 Networks. Journal Of Network security. 2024; 12(03):18-28.
How to cite this URL:
Yash Tanksale, Aparna R. Lokhande, Prathamesh Pavase, Meghana Sobhage. Dynamic Routing and Performance Assessment in IPv6 Networks. Journal Of Network security. 2024; 12(03):18-28. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jons/article=2024/view=172057


References

  1. Subramanian L, Patil A. Performance evaluation of IPv6 routing protocols in Indian mobile ad hoc networks. Int J Comput Appl. 2019;180(37):17–21.
  2. Reddy SV, Kumar AP. An adaptive routing algorithm for IPv6 networks in Indian rural areas. Indian J Sci Technol. 2018;11(13):1–6.
  3. Gupta R, Singh S, Mishra A. Performance analysis of IPv6 routing protocols in Indian smart cities. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci. 2017;8(5):231–6.
  4. Patel DR, Prajapati K. Evaluation of energy-efficient adaptive routing protocols for IPv6-based wireless sensor networks in Indian environments. Indian J Comput Sci Eng. 2016;7(1):24–30.
  5. Sharma S, Sharma A, Bhardwaj R. Comparative analysis of IPv6 routing protocols for Indian industrial internet of things (IoT) networks. J Ind Integr Manag. 2019;4(2):37–44.
  6. Choudhary N, Jain N. An adaptive routing protocol for IPv6 networks in Indian agricultural sensor networks. J Comput Sci Inf Technol. 2018;6(3):43–9.
  7. Singh R, Singh M. Performance evaluation of IPv6 routing protocols in Indian educational campus networks. Int J Netw Virtual Organ. 2017;18(4):315–26.
  8. Mishra S, Das S. A lightweight and adaptive routing protocol for IPv6-based wireless sensor networks in Indian rural environments. Indian J Wireless Netw Appl. 2016;2(2):13–9.
  9. Sharma A, Gupta P, Sharma RK. Adaptive routing analysis in Indian urban vehicular networks using IPv6. J Mobile Commun Comput Inf Technol. 2019;13(3):87–93.
  10. Singh V, Singh A. An energy-efficient and reliable adaptive routing protocol for IPv6-based wireless sensor networks in Indian weather monitoring systems. Indian J Sci Technol. 2018;11(28):1–7.
  11. Mishra R, Patel S. Performance evaluation of IPv6 routing protocols for Indian railway communication networks. Indian J Comput Appl. 2017;136(7):15–21.
  12. Sharma P, Jain M. An adaptive routing algorithm based on artificial neural network for IPv6 networks in Indian e-health systems. Indian J Electron Health Med Inform. 2016;10(4):89–96.
  13. Kumar R, Singh A. Evaluation of IPv6 routing protocols in Indian disaster management networks. J Disaster Resil Manag. 2019;7(2):55–62.
  14. Singh H, Sharma D. A novel adaptive routing protocol for IPv6-based wireless sensor networks in Indian environmental monitoring systems. Indian J Environ Sci. 2018;6(1):21–8.
  15. Verma A, Gupta S. Performance evaluation of IPv6 routing protocols in Indian defences communication networks. Indian J Def Stud. 2017;12(2):45–51.

Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 12
Issue 03
Received 03/07/2024
Accepted 19/07/2024
Published 14/09/2024


My IP

PlumX Metrics