An Empirical Analysis of Cost, Time, and Quality Relationships Using Correlation and Regression Techniques

Year : 2026 | Volume : 16 | Issue : 01 | Page : 52 60
    By

    Veda Venkatesan,

  • Prabakaran R,

  1. Student, Department of Construction Engineering, Coimbatore, Institute of Technology, , India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Coimbatore, Institute of Technology, , India

Abstract

Cost, time, and quality have been recognized as the three key dimensions that determine construction project performance and are commonly represented through the “Project Management Triangle.” However, despite their theoretical linkage, there is limited empirical evidence to quantify the nature of their relationships, particularly within developing construction markets. This paper seeks to contribute to addressing this shortfall by investigating the specific influence of cost and schedule variations upon quality outcomes through correlation analysis and multiple regression modeling. Data were gathered from 30 recently completed residential and commercial projects that varied in size, contractor capability, and procurement method. Key indicators included cost overrun percentage, time overrun percentage, and a composite quality score based on defect density, rework levels, and inspection success rates.The results indicated that the majority of projects had significant cost and time deviations, which implies that planning and coordination of resources remain problematic. The Pearson correlation indicated that the positive correlation of cost and time overruns was high, while both were also significantly negatively correlated with quality scores. Regression results further revealed that more than half of the variation in quality is explained by cost and time overruns, of which time overrun is the better predictor. Overall, the study shows that there is an interrelationship among factors of project performance and points toward the need for early risk control and strong quality management systems.

Keywords: Correlation analysis, project management triangle, quality management, regression modeling, statistical analysis in construction, time–cost–quality relationship.

[This article belongs to Journal of Construction Engineering, Technology & Management ]

How to cite this article:
Veda Venkatesan, Prabakaran R. An Empirical Analysis of Cost, Time, and Quality Relationships Using Correlation and Regression Techniques. Journal of Construction Engineering, Technology & Management. 2026; 16(01):52-60.
How to cite this URL:
Veda Venkatesan, Prabakaran R. An Empirical Analysis of Cost, Time, and Quality Relationships Using Correlation and Regression Techniques. Journal of Construction Engineering, Technology & Management. 2026; 16(01):52-60. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jocetm/article=2026/view=236383


References

  1. Czarnigowska A, Sobotka A. Time-cost relationship for predicting construction duration. Bud Archit. 2013;12(1):23-30. doi:10.35784/bud-arch.2160.
  2. Mostofi F, Toğan V, Ayözen YE, Tokdemir OB. Predicting the impact of construction rework cost using an ensemble classifier. Sustainability. 2022;14(22):14800. doi:10.3390/su142214800.
  3. Mendomo Meye S, Li G, Shen Z, Zhang J. Fuzzy multi-mode time–cost–quality trade-off optimization in construction management of hydraulic structure projects. Appl Sci. 2022;12(12):6270. doi:10.3390/app12126270.
  4. Cleary JP, Lamanna AJ. Correlation of construction performance indicators and project success in a portfolio of building projects. Buildings. 2022;12(7):957. doi:10.3390/buildings12070957.
  5. Forcada N, Gangolells M, Casals M, Macarulla M. Factors affecting rework costs in construction. J Constr Eng Manag. 2017;143(8):04017032. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001324.
  6. Belay AM, Torp O. Construction cost performance under quality-gated framework: The cases of Norwegian road constructions. Int J Constr Manag. 2023;23:1030-1043. doi:10.1080/15623599.2021.1949670.
  7. Ayalew GM, Meharie MG, Ayalew GG. Regression modeling for prediction of earned value indexes in public building construction projects: The case of Ethiopia. Cogent Eng. 2023;10(1). doi:10.1080/23311916.2023.2220497.
  8. Jiang F, Awaitey J, Xie H. Analysis of construction cost and investment planning using time series data. Sustainability. 2022;14:1703. doi:10.3390/su14031703.
  9. Eiris Pereira R, Flood I. Impact of linear correlation on construction project performance using stochastic linear scheduling. Vis Eng. 2017;5:8. doi:10.1186/s40327-017-0045-2.
  10. Al-Tmeemy S, Al Bassam B. An empirical analysis of the relationship between cost of control activities and project management success. MATEC Web Conf. 2018;162:02036. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201816202036.
  11. Mahamid I. Rework investigation in residential building projects: Cost, factors and effects. Int Rev Appl Sci Eng. 2024;15(1):116-122. doi:10.1556/1848.2023.00694.
  12. Josephson PE, Hammarlund Y. The causes and costs of defects in construction. Autom Constr. 1999;8(6):681-687. doi:10.1016/S0926-5805(98)00114-9.
  13. Nusraningrum D, Priyono J. Analysis of cost control, time, and quality on construction projects. J Manag Bus. 2018;17(1). doi:10.24123/jmb.v17i1.364.
  14. Son PVH, Khoi LNQ. Optimization of construction projects time-cost-quality-environment trade-off problem using adaptive selection slime mold algorithm. J Soft Comput Civ Eng. 2024;8(1):107-125. doi:10.22115/SCCE.2023.390042.1622.
  15. Alshamrani OS. Construction cost prediction model for conventional and sustainable college buildings in North America. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2017;11:315-323. doi:10.1016/j.jtusci.2016.01.004.
  16. Naldi M, Flamini M. Project makespan estimation: Computational load of interval and point estimates [Preprint]. 2017. arXiv:1707.01880. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1707.01880.
  17. Sadeghi S. Predicting the impact of scope changes on project cost and schedule using machine learning techniques [Preprint]. 2024. arXiv:2412.02041. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.02041.
  18. Tseladikae T, Agumba J, Ochieng G, Adebowale OJ, Edwards D. Correlation analysis of project management practices and performance outcomes in social housing projects. Int J Constr Manag. 2025:1-16. doi:10.1080/15623599.2025.2577931.
  19. Forcada N, Gangolells M, Casals M, Macarulla M. Factors affecting rework costs in construction. J Constr Eng Manag. 2017;143(8):04017032. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001324.
  20. Mosly I. Multivariate analysis of factors influencing construction costs in Saudi Arabia. Buildings. 2025;15(5):687. doi:10.3390/buildings15050687.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 16
Issue 01
Received 03/12/2025
Accepted 16/01/2026
Published 20/01/2026
Publication Time 48 Days
158

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics