Conducting an Experimental Study on the Behavior of Concrete Involves Partially Substituting Coarse Aggregate with Waste Granite Tiles and Fine Aggregate with Quartz Sandstone Powder

Year : 2024 | Volume :14 | Issue : 03 | Page : 26-34
By
vector

Shivam Dwivedi,

vector

Umank Mishra,

Abstract document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_111652’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

In agricultural nations where cement is generally utilized, the high and consistently inflating cost of
cement has made development over the top expensive. Removal of strong waste materials is an
extraordinary worry in urban communities from one side of the planet to the other. A portion of these
waste materials are not biodegradable, which frequently prompts removal emergency and natural
contamination. Numerous endeavors are being made for the reusing of various kinds of strong
squanders so as to use them in the development of different development materials. Many private and
rural areas are built on landfills that are essentially composed of the massive amounts of side-effect
rock debris produced by the sandstone industry and stone projects. The Indian state of Rajasthan alone
produces 900 million tons of sandstone waste year, leading to a massive dump of materials that have
no practical purpose. The rising yearly creation and those generally aggregated is one of the significant
wellsprings of natural contamination. This study centers around the successful use of these losses as
total in concrete substantial which prompts a by and large manageable improvement in the field of
substantial exploration. In this study, we find that cleaned stone waste from old tiles can be used to
partially replace the coarse total and fractional trade for the fine total in concrete cement. This M30
grade concrete follows the old Indian cement standard code for its design. A water-to-concrete ratio of
0.42 is preserved in this blend design. The compressive and flexural elasticity were significantly
reduced upon fusing cleaned stone tile with quartz sandstone powder waste. Cleaned rock waste has a
lot of potential applications; for example, it might make up 30% of the fine total and 20% of the coarse
total, both of which are typically filled with quartz sandstone powder.

Keywords: Concrete behavior, waste granite tiles, quartz sandstone powder, coarse aggregate replacement, fine aggregate replacement, sustainable development, M30 grade concrete, compressive strength, construction materials

[This article belongs to Journal of Construction Engineering, Technology & Management (jocetm)]

How to cite this article:
Shivam Dwivedi, Umank Mishra. Conducting an Experimental Study on the Behavior of Concrete Involves Partially Substituting Coarse Aggregate with Waste Granite Tiles and Fine Aggregate with Quartz Sandstone Powder. Journal of Construction Engineering, Technology & Management. 2024; 14(03):26-34.
How to cite this URL:
Shivam Dwivedi, Umank Mishra. Conducting an Experimental Study on the Behavior of Concrete Involves Partially Substituting Coarse Aggregate with Waste Granite Tiles and Fine Aggregate with Quartz Sandstone Powder. Journal of Construction Engineering, Technology & Management. 2024; 14(03):26-34. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jocetm/article=2024/view=0

Full Text PDF

Full Text PDF

References
document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_111652’);});Edit

  1. Kumar S, Gupta RC, Shrivastava S, Csetenyi L, Thomas BS. Preliminary study on the use of quartz sandstone as a partial replacement of coarse aggregate in concrete based on clay content, morphology and compressive strength of combined gradation. Constr Build Mater. 2016;107:103-108.
  2. Felixkala T, Partheeban P. Granite powder concrete. Indian J Sci Technol. 2010;3(3):311-317.
  3. Vijayalakshmi M, Sekar ASS, Prabhu GG. Strength and durability properties of concrete made with granite industry waste. Constr Build Mater. 2013;46:1-7.
  4. Joel M. Use of crushed granite fine as replacement to river sand in concrete production. Leonardo Electron J Pract Technol. 2010;17:85-96.
  5. Ramos T, Matos AM, Schmidt B, Rio J, Sousa-Coutinho J. Granitic quarry sludge waste in mortar: effect on strength and durability. Constr Build Mater. 2013;47:1001-1009.
  6. Van Vliet MRA, Van Mier JGM. Experimental investigation of size effect in concrete and sandstone under uniaxial tension. Eng Fract Mech. 2000;65:165-188.
  7. Yilmaz M, Tugrul A. The effects of different sandstone aggregates on concrete strength. Constr Build Mater. 2012;35:294-303.
  8. Kumar S, Gupta RC, Thomas BS, Mehra P. Aggregate replacement and its usefulness in cement concrete for sustainable development-a study on rubber, jarosite and sandstone aggregates. In: Sustainable Development and Environmental Management. Springer, Cham; 2016. p. 13-25.
  9. Divakar Y, Manjunath S, Aswath MU. Experimental investigation on behaviour of concrete with the use of granite fines. Int J Appl Eng Res. 2012;1(4).
  10. Sharma NK, Kumar P, Kumar S, Thomas BS, Gupta RC. Properties of concrete containing polished granite waste as partial substitution of coarse aggregate. Constr Build Mater. 2017;151:158-163.
  11. Murali G, Jayavelu KR, Jeevitha N, Rubini M, Saranya NR. Experimental investigation on concrete with partial replacement of coarse aggregate. Int J Eng Res Appl. 2012;2(2):322-327.
  12. Alzboon KK, Mahasneh KN. Effect of using stone cutting waste on the compression strength and slump characteristics of concrete. Int J Civil Environ Eng. 2009;1(4).
  13. Turgut P, Yahlizade ES. Research into concrete blocks with waste glass. Int J Civil Environ Eng. 2009;1(4).
  14. Yilmaz M, Tugrul A. The effects of different sandstone aggregates on concrete strength. Constr Build Mater. 2012;35:294-303.
  15. Van Vliet MRA, Van Mier JGM. Experimental investigation of size effect in concrete and sandstone under uniaxial tension. Eng Fract Mech. 2000;65:165-188.
  16. Umapathy U, Mala C, Siva K. Assessment of concrete strength using partial replacement of coarse aggregate for waste tiles and cement for rice husk ash in concrete. Int J Eng Res Appl. 2014;4(5):72-76.
  17. VeeraReddy M. Investigations on stone dust and ceramic scrap as aggregate replacement in concrete. Int J Civil Struct Eng. 2010;1(3).
  18. SivaKumar R, Mohammedyousuff H, Haripriya M. An experimental study on partial replacement for coarse aggregate by granite waste. Int J Innov Sci Eng Technol. 2016;3(3):349-353.
  19. Vashist S, Naval S. To study the strength characteristics of concrete using waste marble powder and recycled coarse aggregates. Int J Sci Res. 2016;5(5):159-164.
  20. Hamza RA, El-Haggar S, Khedr S. Marble and granite waste: characterization and utilization in concrete bricks. Int J Biosci Biochem Bioinf. 2011;1(4):286.
  21. Sekar T, Ganesan N, Nampoothiri NVN. Studies on strength characteristics on utilization of waste materials as coarse aggregate in concrete. Int J Eng Sci Technol. 2011;3(7).
  22. Shetty MS. Concrete technology: theory and practice. New Delhi: S. Chand and Company Ltd; 2005.
  23. Devi S, Gandhi N, Mahipal, Marmat N, Manda B, Vaishnav M. Utilization of marble and granite waste as partial replacement of cement in concrete. Int J Civil Eng SSRG-IJCE. 2016;3(5):193-197.
  24. Gambhir ML. Concrete manual. New Delhi: Dhanpat Rai & Co Pvt Ltd.
  25. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Plain and reinforced concrete code of practice. IS 456. New Delhi: BIS; 2000.
  26. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Concrete mix proportioning – guidelines. IS 10262. New Delhi: BIS; 2009.
  27. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). 43 grade ordinary Portland cement specification. IS 8112. New Delhi: BIS; 1989.
  28. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Methods of test for aggregates for concrete. IS 2386. New Delhi: BIS.
  29. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Specification and fine aggregate from natural sources for concrete. IS 383. New Delhi: BIS.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 14
Issue 03
Received 21/08/2024
Accepted 10/09/2024
Published 17/09/2024
179

function myFunction2() {
var x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);
if (x.style.display === “block”) {
x.style.display = “none”;
}
else { x.style.display = “Block”; }
}
document.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {
changeSlides(-1);
});
document.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {
changeSlides(1);
});
var slideIndex = 1;
showSlides(slideIndex);
function changeSlides(n) {
showSlides((slideIndex += n));
}
function currentSlide(n) {
showSlides((slideIndex = n));
}
function showSlides(n) {
var i;
var slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);
var dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);
if (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }
if (n (item.style.display = “none”));
Array.from(dots).forEach(
item => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))
);
slides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;
dots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;
}