Choosing the Right Machine: A Comparative Analysis of Desktops and Laptops

Year : 2025 | Volume : 15 | Issue : 03 | Page : 41 49
    By

    V. Basil Hans,

  1. Research Professor, Department of Management & Commerce, Srinivas University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Abstract

This study provides a comparative analysis of desktop and laptop computers, focusing on factors such as performance, portability, cost, and user requirements. Desktops are highlighted as the preferred option for resource-intensive tasks like gaming, video editing, and handling large-scale data because of their powerful processors, efficient cooling mechanisms, and expandability. These systems are well suited for users who prioritize high performance and the ability to upgrade components over time. On the other hand, laptops are designed with compactness and mobility in mind, featuring lightweight builds and integrated batteries. This makes them especially appealing to students, professionals on the move, and casual users who need convenience and portability rather than maximum computing power. The study carefully outlines the strengths and limitations of each category, offering readers a practical guide to choosing the right device depending on individual needs and priorities. In addition, it explores emerging technology trends that are reshaping the boundaries between desktops and laptops. Innovations such as ultra-thin, high-performance laptops and sleek all-in-one desktop systems are narrowing the gap, giving users more versatile choices. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes that the best option depends on balancing performance requirements, mobility, and budget considerations in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.

Keywords: Portable hardware, ultrabooks, power users, operating systems

[This article belongs to Journal of Communication Engineering & Systems ]

How to cite this article:
V. Basil Hans. Choosing the Right Machine: A Comparative Analysis of Desktops and Laptops. Journal of Communication Engineering & Systems. 2025; 15(03):41-49.
How to cite this URL:
V. Basil Hans. Choosing the Right Machine: A Comparative Analysis of Desktops and Laptops. Journal of Communication Engineering & Systems. 2025; 15(03):41-49. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joces/article=2025/view=228226


References

  1. Mann JA, MacDonald BA, Kuo IH, Li X, Broadbent E. People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions. Comput Hum Behav. 2015 Feb 1; 43: 112–7.
  2. Harvey J, Smith A, Golightly D. Giving and sharing in the computer‐mediated economy. J Consum Behav. 2017 Jul; 16(4): 363–71.
  3. Wang JH, Chang LP, Chen SY. Effects of cognitive styles on web-based learning: Desktop computers versus mobile devices. J Educ Comput Res. 2018 Sep; 56(5): 750–69.
  4. Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, Thellenberg-Karlsson C, Hoyer M, Lagerlund M, Kindblom J, Ginman C, Johansson B, Björnlinger K, Seke M. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 3; 394(10196): 385–95.
  5. Liu Z, Zhang W, Hu L. Can desktop virtual reality effectively enhance academic achievement?—A meta-analysis. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2025 May 4; 62(3): 795–810.
  6. Kotowski SE, Davis KG. Impact of Covid-19 on the Use of Laptops by College Students and the Effects on Posture and Discomfort. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 2021 Sep; 65(1): 705–707.
  7. Hwang AH, Kim J, Lobo SN, Shu Y, Won AS. Being there to learn: Narrative style and cross-platform comparison for 360-degree educational videos. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact. 2022 Nov 11; 6(CSCW2): 1–28.
  8. Zhao HH, Yang K, Yu W, Gao D, Shou MZ. WorldGUI: An Interactive Benchmark for Desktop GUI Automation from Any Starting Point. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08047. 2025 Feb 12.
  9. Atkinson P. Computer memories: The history of computer form. Hist Technol: an International Journal. 1998 Sep 1; 15(1–2): 89–120.
  10. Mishra U. 10 Inventions on laptop keyboards-A study based on US patents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.3849. 2013 Oct 11.
  11. Wardenaar FC, Chan Y, Clear AM, Schott K, Mohr AE, Ortega-Santos CP, Seltzer RG, Pugh J. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale has a Good Test–Retest Reliability in Well-Trained Athletes with and without Previously Self-Identified Gastrointestinal Complaints. Sports Med. 2025 Feb; 55(2): 513–24.
  12. Hè H. PerOS: Personalized Self-Adapting Operating Systems in the Cloud. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.00057. 2024 Mar 26.
  13. Kambalapalli YR. Different forensic tools on a single SSD and HDD, their differences and drawbacks. Thesis. St. Cloud, Minnesota: Herberger School of Business; 2018.
  14. Norliah K, Muliati S, Mahadi AH. Learning organization as drivers of human resources 4.0 at the Technical University of Malaysia Melaka (UTEM). Journal of Human Capital Development (JHCD). 2022; 15(2): 39–52.
  15. Oughton EJ, Lehr W, Katsaros K, Selinis I, Bubley D, Kusuma J. Revisiting wireless internet connectivity: 5G vs Wi-Fi 6. Telecommun Policy. 2021 Jun 1; 45(5): 102127.
  16. Tungare M, Pérez-Quinones M. It’s not what you have, but how you use it: Compromises in mobile device use. arXiv preprint arXiv:0801.4423. 2008 Jan 29.
  17. Amir G, Prusak A, Reiss T, Zabari N, Feitelson DG. Use and Perceptions of Multi-Monitor Workstations: A Natural Experiment. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 8th International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practice (SER&IP). 2021 Jun 4; 29–36.
  18. Ryen EG. An Ecological Framework to Assess Sustainability Impacts for an Evolving Consumer Electronic Product System. Thesis. New York: Rochester Institute of Technology; 2014.
  19. DeVierno A. Determining a relationship between design characteristics and the end-of-life disposition of cellular phones. Thesis. New York: Rochester Institute of Technology; 2011.
  20. Zamir H. Cybersecurity and social media. In: Chang H-C, Hawamdeh S, editors. Cybersecurity for Information Professionals: Concepts and Applications. New York: Auerbach Publications; 2020.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 15
Issue 03
Received 10/03/2025
Accepted 09/04/2025
Published 24/09/2025
Publication Time 198 Days
46

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics