Bridging the Digital Divide: Examining the Ethical and Societal Impacts of Computing

Year : 2025 | Volume : 15 | Issue : 03 | Page : 01 13
    By

    V. Basil Hans,

  1. Research Scholar, Department of Management & Commerce, Srinivas University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Abstract

The fast-paced advancement of computing technologies has greatly influenced modern society, bringing with it both opportunities and challenges. While these innovations have improved efficiency, connectivity, and accessibility, they have also introduced pressing concerns that require careful consideration. Issues such as privacy protection, the widening digital divide, algorithmic bias, cybersecurity risks, and ethical dilemmas surrounding artificial intelligence are at the forefront of these challenges. As computing becomes increasingly integrated into everyday life, its social implications grow more significant. On one hand, these developments drive progress and open up new possibilities; on the other, they create risks that can negatively impact individuals and communities if left unchecked. This study highlights the dual nature of technological growth, showing how it can both benefit and harm society. It underscores the importance of adopting a balanced approach through effective legislation, thoughtful regulation, and comprehensive education. Such measures are essential to ensure that technological innovation serves the collective good rather than deepening inequalities. The discussion also stresses the ongoing need for dialogue and proactive efforts to address social and economic disparities while fostering ethical practices in computing. Ultimately, responsible management of technology is key to maximizing its benefits while minimizing potential harm.

Keywords: Ethical behaviour, critical thinking, personal data, digital divide, ethical issues, algorithmic prejudice

[This article belongs to Journal of Communication Engineering & Systems ]

How to cite this article:
V. Basil Hans. Bridging the Digital Divide: Examining the Ethical and Societal Impacts of Computing. Journal of Communication Engineering & Systems. 2025; 15(03):01-13.
How to cite this URL:
V. Basil Hans. Bridging the Digital Divide: Examining the Ethical and Societal Impacts of Computing. Journal of Communication Engineering & Systems. 2025; 15(03):01-13. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joces/article=2025/view=228077


References

  1. Duquenoy P. Ethics of computing. In: Perspectives and Policies on ICT in Society: An IFIP TC9 (Computers and Society) Handbook. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2005; 159–170.
  2. Dearden A, Walker S, Watts L. Choosing friends carefully: allies for critical computing. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility. 2005 Aug 20; 133–136.
  3. Wright DR. Research ethics and computer science: an unconsummated marriage. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication. 2006 Oct 18; 196–201.
  4. Lahlou S. Cognitive technologies, social science and the three-layered leopardskin of change. Soc Sci Inf. 2008 Sep; 47(3): 227–51.
  5. Sheth S, Kaiser G. The tradeoffs of societal computing. In Proceedings of the 10th SIGPLAN symposium on New ideas, new paradigms, and reflections on programming and software. 2011 Oct 22; 149–156.
  6. Stahl BC, Eden G, Jirotka M, Coeckelbergh M. From computer ethics to responsible research and innovation in ICT: The transition of reference discourses informing ethics-related research in information systems. Inf Manag. 2014 Sep 1; 51(6): 810–8.
  7. Carrigan CM. Yearning to give back: Searching for social purpose in computer science and engineering. Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 18; 8: 1178.
  8. Zheng Y, Walsham G. Inequality of what? An intersectional approach to digital inequality under Covid-19. Inf Organ. 2021 Mar 1; 31(1): 100341.
  9. Starke C, Baleis J, Keller B, Marcinkowski F. Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Big Data Soc. 2022 Jul; 9(2): 20539517221115189.
  10. Sannon S, Forte A. Privacy research with marginalized groups: what we know, what’s needed, and what’s next. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact. 2022 Nov 11; 6(CSCW2): 1–33.
  11. Shelby R, Rismani S, Henne K, Moon A, Rostamzadeh N, Nicholas P, Yilla-Akbari NM, Gallegos J, Smart A, Garcia E, Virk G. Sociotechnical harms of algorithmic systems: Scoping a taxonomy for harm reduction. In Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 2023 Aug 8; 723–741.
  12. Verwiebe R, Bobzien L, Fritsch N, Buder C. Social inequality and digitization in modern societies: a systematic literature review on the role of ethnicity, gender, and age. Soziale Welt. 2023 May 25; 74(1): 3–10.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 15
Issue 03
Received 08/05/2025
Accepted 14/05/2025
Published 22/09/2025
Publication Time 137 Days
45


My IP

PlumX Metrics