Global Robotics Market Dynamics: Trends, Growth, and Future Projections Based on Machine Learning

Year : 2025 | Volume : 12 | Issue : 01 | Page : 01-08
    By

    Nirav Mehta,

  • Khunti Suresh,

  • Odedara Rajesh,

  • Karavadra Sanjay,

  • Kadachha Dhaval,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, Shri V. J. Modha College of Information Technology College in Porbandar, Gujarat, India
  2. Student, Department of Computer Science, Shri V. J. Modha College of Information Technology College in Porbandar, Gujarat, India
  3. Student, Department of Computer Science, Shri V. J. Modha College of Information Technology College in Porbandar, Gujarat, India
  4. Student, Department of Computer Science, Shri V. J. Modha College of Information Technology College in Porbandar, Gujarat, India
  5. Student, Department of Computer Science, Shri V. J. Modha College of Information Technology College in Porbandar, Gujarat, India

Abstract

Robotics is advancing rapidly, fueled by technological innovations and a wide range of applications. In 2020, the global robotics market reached a valuation of $40 billion, with industrial robotics comprising $25 billion. Robots are increasingly being utilized in manufacturing, driving automation and enhancing efficiency. Countries like South Korea, Singapore, and Germany are leading in robot density, highlighting their role in enhancing productivity and competitiveness. The analysis presented in this paper is based on a comprehensive review of existing literature, industry reports, market analyses, and academic research publications related to the robotics industry. Primary and secondary sources of data were utilized to gather relevant information regarding the trends, growth drivers, challenges, and future projections of the global robotics market. The robotics industry, valued at $40 billion in 2020, is rapidly advancing with industrial robotics reaching $25 billion. High robot density in leading countries like South Korea and Singapore is boosting productivity. Service robotics, worth $12 billion, are widely adopted, especially in healthcare. Significant R&D investments, such as the U.S. government’s $2 billion allocation in 2020, highlight a commitment to innovation. Projections suggest the industry could surpass $150 billion by 2027, promising transformative impacts. Emphasizes the paper’s value as a resource for industry stakeholders, policymakers, investors, and researchers in understanding current trends and leveraging future opportunities in the robotics industry.

Keywords: Robotics, global robotics market, industrial robotics, manufacturing sectors robots, service robotics, surgical robots, robot density

[This article belongs to Journal of Advancements in Robotics ]

How to cite this article:
Nirav Mehta, Khunti Suresh, Odedara Rajesh, Karavadra Sanjay, Kadachha Dhaval. Global Robotics Market Dynamics: Trends, Growth, and Future Projections Based on Machine Learning. Journal of Advancements in Robotics. 2024; 12(01):01-08.
How to cite this URL:
Nirav Mehta, Khunti Suresh, Odedara Rajesh, Karavadra Sanjay, Kadachha Dhaval. Global Robotics Market Dynamics: Trends, Growth, and Future Projections Based on Machine Learning. Journal of Advancements in Robotics. 2024; 12(01):01-08. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joarb/article=2024/view=191809


References

  1. Thakrar Z, Gonsai A. Predicting fishing effort: data collection for machine learning model using scientific and indigenous method. In: Choudrie J, Mahalle PN, Perumal T, Joshi A, editors. International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Intelligent Systems. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023. pp. 207–215.
  2. Thakrar Z, Gonsai A. HEFZ–RNNLSTM: an ingenious deep learning hybrid model for ensemble-based prediction of potential fishing zone areas in the Indian Ocean. J Harbin Eng Univ. 2023; 44 (7): 714–721.
  3. Mehta N, Rathod P, Raychura B, Bokhiriya S. A comprehensive review of digital transformation in healthcare: addressing privacy, security, and usability challenges in electronic health records. Res Rev J Med Sci Technol. 2024; 13 (3): 9–14.
  4. Howe RD, Matsuoka Y. Robotics for surgery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 1999; 1 (1): 211–240.
  5. Krishnaprabu S. E-governance in education sector. Int J Recent Technol Eng. 2019; 8 (1C2): 958–961.
  6. Mehta N, Thaker H. Data collection for a machine learning model to suggest Gujarati recipes to cardiac patients using Gujarati food and fruit with nutritive values. In: Choudrie J, Mahalle PN, Perumal T, Joshi A, editors. International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Intelligent Systems. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023. pp. 271–281.
  7. Makedon V, Mykhailenko O, Vazov R. Dominants and features of growth of the world market of robotics. Eur J Manage Issues. 2021; 29 (3): 133–141.
  8. Salet JK, Gokani PK. Design and develop e-governance system for facilitation between government and citizens. J Emerg Technol Innov Res. 2019; 6 (6): 508–516.
  9. Digilina O, Teslenko I. The robotics market: development prerequisites, features and prospects. SHS Web Conf. 2021; 101: 02029.
  10. Salet J, Rakholia K, Rahul O, Jignesh K, Jay K. Navigating the evolution: current trends and future directions in programming languages. Int J Innov Res Computer Sci Technol. 2024; 12 (4): 43–46.
  11. De Backer K, DeStefano T. Robotics and the global organisation of production. In: von Braun J, Archer SM, Reichberg GM, Sánchez Sorondo M, editors. Robotics, AI, and Humanity: Science, Ethics, and Policy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2021. pp. 71–84.
  12. Salet JK, Parekh B. Implementation of e-governance framework for rural areas of India. In: Goar V, Kuri M, Kumar R, Senjyu T, editors. Advances in Information Communication Technology and Computing: Proceedings of AICTC 2022. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023. pp. 341–352.
  13. Gasparetto A, Scalera L. A brief history of industrial robotics in the 20th century. Adv Historical Stud. 2019; 8: 24–35.
  14. Kanjibhai SJ, Gokani PK. Effective role of e-governance in higher education. NOLEGEIN – J Corporate Business Laws. 2020; 3 (1): 1–6.
  15. Paulius D, Sun Y. A survey of knowledge representation in service robotics. Robotics Autonom Syst. 2019; 118: 13–30.
  16. Garcia S, Strüber D, Brugali D, Berger T, Pelliccione P. Robotics software engineering: a perspective from the service robotics domain. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Virtual Event, November 8–13, 2020. pp. 593–604.
  17. Mehta N. Fuzzy logic driven nutrition-based recommendation system for Gujarati cardiac patients: integrating cultural preferences and patient feedback. J Computer Technol Appl. 2024; 15 (1): 59–83.
  18. Zachiotis GA, Andrikopoulos G, Gornez R, Nakamura K, Nikolakopoulos G. A survey on the application trends of home service robotics. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, December 12–15, 2018. pp. 1999–2006.
  19. Mehta N, Thaker H. Study of nutrition-based recommender system for diabetes and cardiovascular patients based on various machine learning techniques: a systematic review. In: Goar V, Kuri M, Kumar R, Senjyu T, editors. Advances in Information Communication Technology and Computing: Proceedings of AICTC 2022. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023. pp. 317–327.
  20. Le HM, Do TN, Phee SJ. A survey on actuators-driven surgical robots. Sensors Actuators A Phys. 2016; 247: 323–354.
  21. Gifari MW, Naghibi H, Stramigioli S, Abayazid M. A review on recent advances in soft surgical robots for endoscopic applications. Int J Med Robotics Computer Assist Surg. 2019; 15 (5): e2010.
  22. Kishorchandra PV, Rajnikant AP. A critical analysis using data mining techniques to predict students’ educational performance: analyzing the impact of non-intellectual parameters. In: Goar V, Sharma A, Shin J, Mridha MF, editors. Deep Learning and Visual Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of ICDLAI 2024. Singapore: Springer; 2024. pp. 205–213.
  23. Díaz CE, Fernández R, Armada M, García F. A research review on clinical needs, technical requirements, and normativity in the design of surgical robots. Int J Med Robotics Computer Assist Surg. 2017; 13 (4): e1801.
  24. Schneier M, Bostelman R. Literature Review of Mobile Robots for Manufacturing. [Online]. NISTIR 8022. Available at https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=915942
  25. Pandya V. Role of e-learning based higher education in sustainable development. E-Commerce Future Trends. 2023; 7 (2): 20–23.
  26. Leigh NG, Kraft B, Lee H. Robots, skill demand and manufacturing in US regional labour markets. Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc. 2020; 13 (1): 77–97.
  27. Pandya V, Monani D, Aahuja D, Chotai U. Traditional vs. modern education: a comparative analysis. Int J Res Anal Rev. 2024; 11 (2): 172–183.
  28. Zhao S, Ramakrishnan S, Kumar M. Density-based control of multiple robots. In: Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, June 29–July 1, 2011. pp. 481–486.
  29. Thakrar Z, Buddhadev KJ, Bhatt HD, Bhadrecha NH, Bhogayata MD. Swimmer safety alert system for encounters with unidentified marine aquatic animals. Int J Innov Res Computer Sci Technol. 2024; 12 (4): 47–51.
  30. Kishorchandra PV, Vadher B, Meghnathi R, Raychura M, Keshwala K. A comprehensive review – building a secure social media environment for kids – automated content filtering with biometric feedback. Int J Innov Res Computer Sci Technol. 2024; 12 (4): 25–30.
  31. Zabihi M, Jahan MV, Hamidzadeh J. A density based clustering approach for web robot detection. In: 2014 4th International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE), Mashhad, Iran, October 29–30, 2014. pp. 23–28.
  32. Thakrar Z, Gonsai A. Combined study of oceanography and indigenous method for effective fishing. In: Yadav S, Haleem A, Arora PK, Kumar H, editors. Proceedings of Second International Conference in Mechanical and Energy Technology: ICMET 2021. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2022. pp. 147–155.
  33. Thakrar Z, Gonsai A. Comparing fish finding techniques using satellite and indigenous data based on different machine learning algorithms. In: Goar V, Kuri M, Kumar R, Senjyu T, editors. Advances in Information Communication Technology and Computing: Proceedings of AICTC 2022. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023. pp. 329–340.
  34. Kumar KS, Kumar TC, Rajan MS, Thakrar ZT, Cheepurupalli NR, Mungekar PR. Based on 5G internet of things technology (IoT), the integrity of agricultural products and the sustainability of the origin’s ecological environment. J Informatics Educ Res. 2024; 4 (2): 2141–2147.
  35. Bouwman CH, Fuller K, Nain AS. Market valuation and acquisition quality: empirical evidence. Rev Financial Stud. 2009; 22 (2): 633–679.
  36. Nadikattu AK. Influence of artificial intelligence on robotics industry. Int J Creative Res Thoughts. 2021; 9 (1): 4708–4714.
  37. Normann R. Regional leadership: a systemic view. Systemic Pract Action Res. 2013; 26: 23–38.
  38. Benmelech E, Zator M. Robots and Firm Investment. [Online]. Cambridge, MA, USA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2022. Available at https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29676/w29676.pdf
  39. Delmerico J, Mintchev S, Giusti A, Gromov B, Melo K, Horvat T, Cadena C, Hutter M, Ijspeert A, Floreano D, Gambardella LM. The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics. J Field Robotics. 2019; 36 (7): 1171–1191.

Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 12
Issue 01
Received 20/11/2024
Accepted 23/12/2024
Published 31/12/2024
Publication Time 41 Days


My IP

PlumX Metrics