Enhancing Robot Autonomy: Integrating AI for Advanced Decision-making in Autonomous Robotic Systems

Year : 2024 | Volume : 11 | Issue : 03 | Page : 28 37
    By

    Mritunjay Kr. Ranjan,

  • Ashish Singh,

  • Pankaj Patil,

  • Aniket Anand,

  • Mansi P. Mahajan,

  • Shilpi Saxena,

  1. Assistant Professor, School of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Sandip University Nashik, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
  2. Student, School of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Sandip University Nashik, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
  3. Assistant Professor, School of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Sandip University Nashik, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
  4. Scholar, Dept. of Computer Science and Information Technology, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Bihar, India
  5. Student, School of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Sandip University Nashik, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
  6. Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Application & IT, Lords University, Alwar, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

The capabilities of autonomous robotic systems have been drastically changed by the rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. In this work, we investigate the integration of AI approaches to improve robot autonomy by presenting even more advanced mechanisms for decision-making. Almost all traditional robotic systems involve predefined algorithms, making them unable to cope with dynamic environments. They can also help with learning based on machine learning and deep learning methodologies to make use of experience and make themselves flexible and efficient over a period. In this work, a model is proposed that combines reinforcement learning with real-time sensory data processing to allow autonomous robots to react in unfamiliar situations. We explain several AI models as well as how effective they are in practical use cases such as autonomous navigation, obstacle avoidance, and task optimization in addition, we consider the attendant ethical consequences and practical issues that arise when AI is used for making decisions within robotics systems in terms of safety requirements. We have confirmed that the performance of AI-driven robotic systems is improved over conventional methods through simulations and experimental results. The work represents an important step for AI in enabling the future creation of smarter, more capable robots that can properly function within complex dynamic environments. The decision-making skills of autonomous robotic systems have been transformed by the incorporation of AI, allowing for increased adaptability in dynamic contexts. This study introduces a novel paradigm to enhance robot autonomy in novel scenarios by fusing real-time sensory data processing with reinforcement learning. In real-world applications like task optimization, obstacle avoidance, and autonomous navigation, we evaluate how well different AI models perform.

Keywords: Autonomous robotics, artificial intelligence, decision-making, machine learning, reinforcement learning, sensor data processing

[This article belongs to Journal of Advancements in Robotics ]

How to cite this article:
Mritunjay Kr. Ranjan, Ashish Singh, Pankaj Patil, Aniket Anand, Mansi P. Mahajan, Shilpi Saxena. Enhancing Robot Autonomy: Integrating AI for Advanced Decision-making in Autonomous Robotic Systems. Journal of Advancements in Robotics. 2024; 11(03):28-37.
How to cite this URL:
Mritunjay Kr. Ranjan, Ashish Singh, Pankaj Patil, Aniket Anand, Mansi P. Mahajan, Shilpi Saxena. Enhancing Robot Autonomy: Integrating AI for Advanced Decision-making in Autonomous Robotic Systems. Journal of Advancements in Robotics. 2024; 11(03):28-37. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joarb/article=2024/view=180743


References

  1. Beer JM, Fisk AD, Rogers WA. Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human–robot interaction. J Hum Robot Interact. 2014;3:74–99. DOI: 10.5898/JHRI.3.2.Beer, PubMed: 29082107.
  2. Saxena S, Ranjan MK, Sattar AM. Brain-Computer Interfaces. 2024 1st International Conference on Cognitive, Green and Ubiquitous Computing (IC-CGU), Bhubaneswar, India. 2024. pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/IC-CGU58078.2024.10530664.
  3. Ranjan MK, Roy K, Mahind A, Bhavsar D, Nemade S, Sattar AM. Unlocking the potential: Machine learning driven explainable AI applications across diverse domains. Int J Softw Comput Test. 2023;9:24–32. DOI: 10.37628/ijosct.v9i1.948.
  4. Ranjan MK, Sattar AM, Tiwari SK. Blockchain in healthcare systems: An industry prospective study. In: Karthick GS, Karupusamy S, editors. Contemporary applications of data fusion for advanced healthcare informatics. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; 2023. p. 238–59. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-8913-0.ch010.
  5. Ho TM, Nguyen KK, Cheriet M. Federated deep reinforcement learning for task scheduling in heterogeneous autonomous robotic system. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2024;21:528–40. DOI: 10.1109/TASE.2022.3221352.
  6. Al-Rahmani N, Mohan DM, Awad MI, Wasti SA, Hussain I, Khalaf K. Lower-limb robotic assistance devices for drop foot: A review. IEEE Access. 2022;10:51964–94. DOI: 10.1109/
    2022.3174686.
  7. Le NMD, Nguyen NH, Nguyen DA, Ngo TD, Ho VA. ViART: Vision-Based Soft Tactile Sensing for Autonomous Robotic Vehicles. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics. 2024;29:1420–30. DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2023.3301022.
  8. Li K, Xu Y, Meng MQH. An overview of systems and techniques for autonomous robotic ultrasound acquisitions. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics. 2021;3:510–24. DOI: 10.1109/TMRB.
    3072190.
  9. Alwala A, El-Hussieny H, Mohamed A, Iwasaki K, Assal SFM. Hybrid impedance control-based autonomous robotic system for natural-like drinking assistance for disabled persons. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2023;21:1978–92. DOI: 10.1007/s12555-022-0690-7.
  10. Lins RG, Givigi SN. Fpga-based design optimization in autonomous robot systems for inspection of civil infrastructure. IEEE Syst J. 2020;14:2961–4. DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2019.2960309.
  11. Kober J, Bagnell JA, Peters J. Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey. Int J Rob Res. 2013;32:1238–74. DOI: 10.1177/0278364913495721.
  12. Jiang Z, Xu D, Liang J. A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for the Financial Portfolio Management Problem. arXiv Preprint ArXiv:1706.10059. 2017.
  13. Garcia F, Rachelson E. Markov decision processes. In: Sigaud O, Buffet O, editors. Markov Decision Processes in Artificial Intelligence. John Wiley & Sons; 2013. p. 1–38. DOI: 10.1002/9
    ch1.
  14. Schulman J, Wolski F, Dhariwal P, Radford A, Klimov O. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv.org. 2017. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1707.
  15. Steyvers M, Kumar A. Chapters 3 Challenges for AI-assisted decision-making. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024;19:722–34. DOI: 10.1177/17456916231181102, PubMed: 37439761.
  16. Bojić L, Cinelli M, Ćulibrk D, Delibašić B. CERN for AI: A theoretical framework for autonomous simulation-based artificial intelligence testing and alignment. Eur J Futures Res. 2024;12. DOI: 10.1186/s40309-024-00238-0.
  17. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: The convergence of Human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25:44–56. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7, PubMed: 30617339.
  18. Crandall JW, Cummings ML. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM; 2007. p. 33–40. DOI: 10.1145/1228716.1228722.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 11
Issue 03
Received 22/10/2024
Accepted 22/10/2024
Published 04/11/2024
585

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics