The Role of Generative AI in Enhancing Administrative Efficiency: Innovations in Workforce Support Systems

Open Access

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume :12 | Issue : 01 | Page : –
By
vector

Manasa Gadapa,

  1. Insights Analyst, Meta TX,, , USA

Abstract document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_130220’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

Generating AI is the primary form of artificial intelligence that disrupts administrative work across multiple industries by redesigning and promoting the automation of traditional tasks and improving the workforce efficiency of decision-making. In a conventional setting, executive positions have been equally associated with paper-bound responsibilities, common with tedious activities like appointment making, filing, data input, etc. However, improvement in the area of generative AI makes these natural functions assignable, thus minimizing errors that may be occasioned by human interferences and, at the same time, the time saved from the frequent functions may be used to improve the higher advanced functions of the human mind. Through reviewing the literature, this paper also identifies how generative AI has revolutionized the field of administrative support work, especially in terms of automating repetitive tasks, content generation, and decision-making support. Also, it explores the general managerial consequences of AI implementation, such as efficiency perspectives, human resource management, and organizational responsibilities. Developed with examples and tangible cases, the paper overcomes the myths. It outlines the advantages of using AI in administrative work, explaining the issues of data privacy and integration and employee training. After that, the paper describes future possibilities of generative AI for changing the administrative landscape and its contribution to achieving sustainable business performance enhancement. Finally, this paper reviews how generative AI can contribute to administrative efficiency in organizations and shape organizational workforce in the future.

Keywords: Generative AI, Administrative Efficiency, Automation, Workforce Development, Decision-Making

[This article belongs to Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research & Advances (joaira)]

How to cite this article:
Manasa Gadapa. The Role of Generative AI in Enhancing Administrative Efficiency: Innovations in Workforce Support Systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research & Advances. 2024; 12(01):-.
How to cite this URL:
Manasa Gadapa. The Role of Generative AI in Enhancing Administrative Efficiency: Innovations in Workforce Support Systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research & Advances. 2024; 12(01):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joaira/article=2024/view=0


Full Text PDF

References
document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_130220’);});Edit

1. Gartner. (2023). AI and Automation in Workplace Support: Transforming Operations.
2. McKinsey & Company. (2023). AI and the Future of Administrative Roles: Opportunities and Challenges.
3. Harvard Business Review. (2023). Generative AI: Transforming the Administrative Workforce.
4. Deloitte. (2024). AI and the Future of Work: The Role of Automation in Office Efficiency.
5. Forrester. (2024). The Evolution of AI in Administrative Roles: From Automation to Strategic Support.
6. Ashri, R. (2019). The AI-powered workplace: how artificial intelligence, data, and messaging platforms are defining the future of work. Apress.
7. Avital, M., & Te’Eni, D. (2009). From generative fit to generative capacity: exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance. Information systems journal, 19(4), 345-367.
8. Avital, M., & Te’Eni, D. (2009). From generative fit to generative capacity: exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance. Information systems journal, 19(4), 345-367.
9. Azhar, I. (2015). The interaction between artificial intelligence and identity & access management: An empirical study. Ishaq Azhar Mohammed,” THE INTERACTION BETWEEN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND IDENTITY & ACCESS MANAGEMENT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY”, International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), ISSN, 2320-2882.
10. Benbya, H., Davenport, T. H., & Pachidi, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence in organizations: Current state and future opportunities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(4).
11. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. R. (2023). Generative AI at work (No. w31161). National Bureau of Economic Research.
12. Bulfamante, D. (2023). Generative enterprise search with extensible knowledge base using AI (Doctoral dissertation, Politecnico di Torino).
13. Coombs, W. T. (2007). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. Sage.
14. Deb, S. (2016). Perceptions and Anticipations towards AI-Enhanced Risk Management in Agile Project Management: A Comparative Survey-Based Analysis of PMBOK and PRINCE2 Methodologies. Global journal of Business and Integral Security.
15. Endorsed by the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology (AEPC), Authors/Task Force Members, Baumgartner, H., Bonhoeffer, P., De Groot, N. M., de Haan, F., … & Westby, J. (2010). ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010) The Task Force on the Management of Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European heart journal, 31(23), 2915-2957.
16. Gill, A. (2018). Developing a real-time electronic funds transfer system for credit unions. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), 9(1), 162–184. https://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJARET?Volume=9&Issue=1
17. Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Ottaviani, C., Patros, P., Bahsoon, R., Shaghaghi, A., … & Uhlig, S. (2022). AI for next generation computing: Emerging trends and future directions. Internet of Things, 19, 100514.
18. Kumar, A. (2019). The convergence of predictive analytics in driving business intelligence and enhancing DevOps efficiency. International Journal of Computational Engineering and Management, 6(6), 118–142. https://ijcem.in/wp-content/uploads/THE-CONVERGENCE-OF-PREDICTIVE-ANALYTICS-IN-DRIVING-BUSINESS-INTELLIGENCE-AND-ENHANCING-DEVOPS-EFFICIENCY.pdf
19. Li, J. J., Bonn, M. A., & Ye, B. H. (2019). Hotel employee’s artificial intelligence and robotics awareness and its impact on turnover intention: The moderating roles of perceived organizational support and competitive psychological climate. Tourism Management, 73, 172-181.
20. Mantelero, A. (2016). Personal data for decisional purposes in the age of analytics: From an individual to a collective dimension of data protection. Computer law & security review, 32(2), 238-255.
21. Nyati, S. (2018). Revolutionizing LTL carrier operations: A comprehensive analysis of an algorithm-driven pickup and delivery dispatching solution. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 7(2), 1659–1666. https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR24203183637
22. Nyati, S. (2018). Transforming telematics in fleet management: Innovations in asset tracking, efficiency, and communication. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 7(10), 1804–1810. https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR24203184230
23. Ooi, K. B., Tan, G. W. H., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Capatina, A., Chakraborty, A., … & Wong, L. W. (2023). The potential of generative artificial intelligence across disciplines: Perspectives and future directions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1-32.
24. Oplatka, I. (2017). Principal workload: Components, determinants and coping strategies in an era of standardization and accountability. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(5), 552-568.
25. Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data science and its relationship to big data and data-driven decision making. Big data, 1(1), 51-59.
26. Rahdari, A., Sepasi, S., & Moradi, M. (2016). Achieving sustainability through Schumpeterian social entrepreneurship: The role of social enterprises. Journal of cleaner production, 137, 347-360.
27. Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of management review, 46(1), 192-210.
28. Schmidt, P., Biessmann, F., & Teubner, T. (2020). Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(4), 260-278.
29. Sharma, S. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., Metri, B., Lal, B., & Elbanna, A. (Eds.). (2023). Transfer, Diffusion and Adoption of Next-Generation Digital Technologies: IFIP WG 8.6 International Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT, TDIT 2023, Nagpur, India, December 15–16, 2023, Proceedings, Part I (Vol. 697). Springer Nature.
30. Vandiver, B., Balakrishnan, H., Liskov, B., & Madden, S. (2007, October). Tolerating byzantine faults in transaction processing systems using commit barrier scheduling. In Proceedings of twenty-first ACM SIGOPS symposium on Operating Systems Principles (pp. 59-72).
31. Wagner, G., & Prester, J. (2019). Information systems research on digital platforms for knowledge work: A scoping review.
32. Weisz, J. D., Muller, M., Ross, S. I., Martinez, F., Houde, S., Agarwal, M., … & Richards, J. T. (2022, March). Better together? an evaluation of ai-supported code translation. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 369-391).
33. Burian BK, Barshi I, Dismukes K. The challenge of aviation emergency and abnormal situations. 2005 Jun 1.

Regular Issue Open Access Review Article
Volume 12
Issue 01
Received 09/12/2024
Accepted 20/12/2024
Published 30/12/2024
350