An Innovative Fuzzy-Enhanced Black Widow Spider Optimization for Energy-Efficient Cluster Communication Through the Selection of the Ideal Cluster Head

Year : 2024 | Volume : 02 | Issue : 02 | Page : 28 34
    By

    Km Anjuman Bano,

  • Sushil Kumar Sharma,

  1. Student, Department of Computer Science Engineering, Institute of Technology and Management, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department in Computer Science Engineering, Institute of Technology and Management, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to enhance energy efficiency in cluster-based wireless sensor networks (WSNs) by integrating fuzzy logic with the black widow spider optimization (BWSO) algorithm. The focus of the suggested fuzzy-enhanced BWSO approach is on cluster head selection, which is essential for lowering energy consumption and enhancing network performance. The program uses fuzzy logic to assess a number of factors, including network density, node proximity, and energy levels, guaranteeing a more flexible and astute decision-making process. Simulation results show that in terms of energy efficiency, network longevity, and communication overhead, the suggested approach performs noticeably better than conventional clustering strategies. This creative strategy opens the door for more sustainable communication solutions in WSNs while also addressing the shortcomings of current techniques. Interest in studying WSNs has significantly increased as a result of the advancement of wireless communications. Numerous sensor nodes that are digitally attached to one another comprise a WSN. Sensor node components are responsible for observing their environment, processing the information they get, and interacting with different sensor nodes. These sensor nodes collaborate systematically to accomplish a common goal. This suggests using the fuzzy-enhanced black widow spider (FEBWS) algorithm to improve WSN energy efficiency. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is evaluated using the NS-2 simulator. The suggested strategy performs better when the ideal parameter values are predicted using the hyper-parameter tuning technique. Performance is assessed using a number of parameters, including energy efficiency, packet loss, end-to-end latency, network longevity, and energy usage. For the sake of comparative study, the ACI-GSO algorithm, MWCSGA, RNN-LSTM approach, and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm are the other approaches that are contrasted with the recommended FEBWS algorithm.

Keywords: Wireless sensor network, clustering, cluster head, energy efficiency

[This article belongs to International Journal of Wireless Security and Networks ]

How to cite this article:
Km Anjuman Bano, Sushil Kumar Sharma. An Innovative Fuzzy-Enhanced Black Widow Spider Optimization for Energy-Efficient Cluster Communication Through the Selection of the Ideal Cluster Head. International Journal of Wireless Security and Networks. 2024; 02(02):28-34.
How to cite this URL:
Km Anjuman Bano, Sushil Kumar Sharma. An Innovative Fuzzy-Enhanced Black Widow Spider Optimization for Energy-Efficient Cluster Communication Through the Selection of the Ideal Cluster Head. International Journal of Wireless Security and Networks. 2024; 02(02):28-34. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijwsn/article=2024/view=181674


References

  1. Pathak S, Kumar A. An application and architecture of low energy adaptive clustering hierarchy protocol in wireless microsensor network. Int J Eng Sci Math. 2018;7:314-326.
  2. Ghosal A, Halder S, Das SK. Distributed on-demand clustering algorithm for lifetime optimization in wireless sensor networks. J Parallel Distrib Comput. 2020;141:129-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2020.03.014.
  3. Tamene M, Nageswara KN. Fuzzy based distributed cluster formation and route construction in wireless sensor networks. Int J Comput Appl. 2016;140:21-27. DOI: 10.5120/ijca2016909300.
  4. Yadav P. Machine learning in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Int J Res. 2018;VII:777-789.
  5. Ding Q, Zhu R, Liu H, Ma M. An overview of machine learning-based energy-efficient routing algorithms in wireless sensor networks. Electronics. 2021;10:1539. DOI: 10.3390/electronics10131539.
  6. Azad P, Sharma V. Cluster Head Selection in Wireless Sensor Networks under Fuzzy Environment. ISRN Sensor Networks. 2013;2013:909086.
  7. Li X. A Survey on Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks. Project Report for CMPT. 2006;765.
  8. Akyildiz IF, Vuran MC. Wireless Sensor Networks. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons; 2010. DOI: 10.1002/9780470515181.
  9. Lindsey S, Raghavendra CS. PEGASIS: Power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems. Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA. 2002. pp. 3-3. DOI: 10.1109/AERO.2002.1035242.
  10. Kumar V, Jain S, Tiwari S. Energy efficient clustering algorithms in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Int J Comput Sci Issues. 2011;8:259–68.
  11. Mukherjee R, Roy S, Das A. Survey on data collection protocols in wireless sensor networks using mobile data collectors. 2015 2nd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, India. 2015. p. 632-636.
  12. Toor AS, Jain AK. A survey of routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: Hierarchical routing. 2016 International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE), Jaipur, India. 2016. p. 1-6. DOI: 10.1109/ICRAIE.2016.7939555.
  13. Alashwal BY, Saad Bala MS, Gupta A, Sharma S, Mishra P. Improved properties of keratin-based bioplastic film blended with microcrystalline cellulose: A comparative analysis. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2020;32:853-857. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2019.03.006.
  14. Sharmin S, Ahmedy I, Noor RM. An energy-efficient data aggregation clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks using hybrid PSO. Energies. 2023;16:2487. DOI: 10.3390/en16052487.
  15. Tubaishat M, Madria S. Sensor networks: an overview. IEEE Potentials. 2003;22:20-23. DOI: 10.1109/MP.2003.1197877.
  16. Ramesh K, Somasundaram K. A comparative study of clusterhead selection algorithms in wireless sensor networks. Int J Comput Sci Eng Surv. 2011 Nov;2(4):153–64. DOI: 10.5121/ijcses.2011.2411.
  17. Nakas C, Kandris D, Visvardis G. Energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive survey. Algorithms. 2020;13:72. DOI: 10.3390/a13030072.
  18. Barfunga SP, Rai P, Sarma HKD. Energy efficient cluster based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. 2012 International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2012. pp. 603–7. DOI: 10.1109/ICCCE.2012.6271258.
  19. Pantazis NA, Nikolidakis SA, Vergados DD. Energy-efficient routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutorials. 2013;15:551-591. DOI: 10.1109/SURV.2012.062612.00084.
  20. Sharma H, Haque A, Blaabjerg F. Machine learning in wireless sensor networks for smart cities: A survey. Electronics. 2021;10:1012. DOI: 10.3390/electronics10091012.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 02
Issue 02
Received 15/10/2024
Accepted 19/10/2024
Published 08/11/2024
274

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics