Black Hole and Accretion Disks:Observational Discoveries and Theoretical Frameworks

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : August 16, 2024 at 1:01 pm | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume :01 [else] Volume :01[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : 01 | Page : –

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

vector

n

n

Nidhi Gupta, Rohit Singh Lather, Deepak Kumar Bhalla,

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Research Scholar, Head of Department, Director Dean Lingaya’s Vidyapeeth, Faridabad, , Multidisciplinary Engineering Department, The NorthCap University, Gurugram, Mechanical Engineering Department, Lingaya’s Vidyapeeth, Faridabad Haryana, Haryana, Haryana India, India, India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nThis review covers the essential elements of black hole accretion disk theory, beginning with the primary objective of understanding the complex nature of black holes. We delve into how key features of strong gravity, such as the event horizon, innermost stable circular orbit, and ergosphere, manifest in accretion disks. This review revisits the physical mechanisms driving accretion disks and presents four main models: thin disks, Shakura-Sunyaev disks, advection-dominated accretion flows (ADAFs), and Polish doughnuts (thick disks). Each model is examined in detail to highlight its unique characteristics and contributions to our understanding of black hole environments.
Following the presentation of these models, we address crucial aspects such as stability, oscillations, and the formation of jets within these accretion disks. The review then concludes with specific astrophysical applications, including quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs), black hole accretion disk spectral states, comparisons between black hole and neutron star accretion disks, and measurements of black hole mass and spin.
Recent X-ray observations have detected broad emission lines in the innermost regions of accretion disks in microquasars and Seyfert galaxies. These lines exhibit a distinctive two-peak profile when observed from a low inclination angle, with additional peaks appearing at high angles (> 85°). Matt et al. (1993) used the Schwarzschild black hole metric to study this effect and suggested it extends to the Kerr metric. We confirm and validate their conjecture regarding the spectral line shape in the Kerr metric. Additionally, we examine how the morphologies of iron spectral lines can provide insights into the maximum magnetic field strength near the black hole horizon, offering a deeper understanding of these enigmatic regions.

n

n

n

Keywords: Black holes, accretion disk, gravitational lensing , black hole shadow, Penrose process, Blandford- Znajek process

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to International Journal of Universe(iju)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in International Journal of Universe(iju)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Nidhi Gupta, Rohit Singh Lather, Deepak Kumar Bhalla. Black Hole and Accretion Disks:Observational Discoveries and Theoretical Frameworks. International Journal of Universe. August 16, 2024; 01(01):-.

n

How to cite this URL: Nidhi Gupta, Rohit Singh Lather, Deepak Kumar Bhalla. Black Hole and Accretion Disks:Observational Discoveries and Theoretical Frameworks. International Journal of Universe. August 16, 2024; 01(01):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/iju/article=August 16, 2024/view=0

nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n

n[if 992 not_equal=’Open Access’] [/if 992]n

nn

nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. Volonteri M, Habouzit M, Colpi M. The origins of massive black holes. Nature Reviews Physics. 2021 Nov;3(11):732-43..
  2. Dihingia IK, Vaidya B, Fendt C. Truncated accretion discs in black hole X-ray binaries: dynamics and variability signatures. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2022 Dec;517(4):5032-49.
  3. Larson RL, Finkelstein SL, Kocevski DD, Hutchison TA, Trump JR, Haro PA, Bromm V, Cleri NJ, Dickinson M, Fujimoto S, Kartaltepe JS. A CEERS discovery of an accreting supermassive black hole 570 Myr after the Big Bang: identifying a progenitor of massive z> 6 quasars. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 2023 Aug 22;953(2):L29.
  4. Koudmani S, Somerville RS, Sijacki D, Bourne MA, Jiang YF, Profit K. A unified accretion disc model for supermassive black holes in galaxy formation simulations: method and implementation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2024 Jun 8:stae1422.
  5. Rathi C. EXPLORING THE BLACK HOLE INFORMATION PARADOX.
  6. National Research Council, Division on Engineering, Physical Sciences, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, Applications, Space Studies Board, Task Group on Research, Analysis Programs. Supporting Research and Data Analysis in NASA’s Science Programs: Engines for Innovation and Synthesis. National Academies Press; 1998 Nov 16.
  7. Chael A, Issaoun S, Pesce DW, Johnson MD, Ricarte A, Fromm CM, Mizuno Y. Multifrequency Black Hole Imaging for the Next-generation Event Horizon Telescope. The Astrophysical Journal. 2023 Mar 6;945(1):40.
  8. Lin DN, Papaloizou JC. Theory of accretion disks II: application to observed systems. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 1996 Sep;34(1):703-47.
  9. Abramowicz MA, Fragile PC. Foundations of black hole accretion disk theory. Living Reviews in Relativity. 2013 Dec;16:1-88.
  10. Frolov VP, Zelnikov A. Introduction to black hole physics. OUP Oxford; 2011 Sep 23.

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””]Regular Issue[else]Published[/if 424] Subscription Review Article

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume 01
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] 01
Received July 27, 2024
Accepted August 15, 2024
Published August 16, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]