V Hans,
- Research Professor, Department of Management and Commerce, Srinivas University, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India
Abstract
Advances in satellite remote sensing have revolutionized our ability to monitor, analyze, and understand the Earth’s environment across various scales. Over the past few decades, the field has seen remarkable progress in sensor technology, data processing techniques, and analytical methodologies. Modern satellites now provide high-resolution imagery and multi-spectral data, enabling enhanced monitoring of land cover, atmospheric conditions, oceanic dynamics, and natural disasters. These advancements have facilitated improvements in climate change modeling, resource management, urban planning, and disaster response. Furthermore, the integration of machine learning and artificial intelligence has significantly boosted the accuracy and efficiency of data interpretation, fostering innovative applications in environmental monitoring and forecasting. This article explores the latest trends in satellite remote sensing, focusing on new technologies, data acquisition systems, and interdisciplinary applications, while also addressing challenges such as data privacy, accessibility, and the need for international collaboration in space-based observation efforts.
Keywords: Remote sensing, space-based observation efforts, range of applications, cryosphere
[This article belongs to International Journal of Satellite Remote Sensing ]
V Hans. Next-Generation Satellite Remote Sensing: Innovations, Applications, and Future Prospects. International Journal of Satellite Remote Sensing. 2025; 03(01):37-62.
V Hans. Next-Generation Satellite Remote Sensing: Innovations, Applications, and Future Prospects. International Journal of Satellite Remote Sensing. 2025; 03(01):37-62. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijsrs/article=2025/view=208009
References
1. Tucker CJ. Foreword: Satellite Remote Sensing Beyond 2015. In: Thenkabail PS, editor. Remote Sensing Handbook Volume 1: Remotely Sensed Data Characterization, Classification, and Accuracies. Boca raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 2017. pp. xi–xvi.
2. Landgrebe DA. Machine processing for remotely acquired data. LARS Technical Reports. 1973. Available at https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=larstech
3. Thompson SD. Evaluation of a Microwave Radiative Transfer Model for Calculating Satellite Brightness Temperature. MSc Thesis. Orlando, FL, USA: University of Central Florida; 2004.
4. Elachi C. Advances in spaceborne active microwave sensing. In: 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, July 10–14, 1989. Vol. 4, pp. 2260–2260.
5. Sinha GR. Image processing tools for improved visualization and analysis of remotely sensed images for agriculture and forest classifications. Agric Forestry J. 2017; 1 (1): 27–32.
6. Huang S. The Potential of Multi-sensor Satellite Data for Applications in Environmental Monitoring with Special Emphasis on Land Cover Mapping, Desertification Monitoring and Fire Detection. Doctoral Dissertation. Munich, Germany: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; 2005.
7. Manikiam KN. Climate change analysis using satellite data. Mapana J Sci. 2015; 14 (1): 25.
8. Muller‐Karger FE, Hestir E, Ade C, Turpie K, Roberts DA, Siegel D, Miller RJ, Humm D, Izenberg N, Keller M, Morgan F. Satellite sensor requirements for monitoring essential biodiversity variables of coastal ecosystems. Ecol Appl. 2018; 28 (3): 749–760.
9. Blaschke T, Hay GJ, Weng Q, Resch B. Collective sensing: integrating geospatial technologies to understand urban systems — an overview. Remote Sensing. 2011; 3 (8): 1743–1776.
10. Cooper S, Anderson D, Mckim HL, Gatto LW, Merry CJ, Haugen RK. Skylab imagery: application to reservoir management in New England. Report Number NASA-CR-144514. September 1, 1975.
11. Sosa-Herrera JA, Vallejo-Pérez MR, Álvarez-Jarquín N, Cid-García NM, López-Araujo DJ. Geographic object-based analysis of airborne multispectral images for health assessment of Capsicum annuum L. crops. Sensors. 2019; 19 (21): 4817.
12. Pinter Jr PJ, Hatfield JL, Schepers JS, Barnes EM, Moran MS, Daughtry CS, Upchurch DR. Remote sensing for crop management. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing. 2003; 69 (6): 647–664.
13. Mazzia V, Comba L, Khaliq A, Chiaberge M, Gay P. UAV and machine learning based refinement of a satellite-driven vegetation index for precision agriculture. Sensors. 2020; 20 (9): 2530.
14. Novellino A, Jordan C, Ager G, Bateson L, Fleming C, Confuorto P. Remote sensing for natural or man-made disasters and environmental changes. In: Durrani TS, Wang W, Forbes S, editors. Geological Disaster Monitoring Based on Sensor Networks. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2019. pp. 23–31.
15. Wieland M, Martinis S. A modular processing chain for automated flood monitoring from multi-spectral satellite data. Remote Sensing. 2019; 11 (19): 2330.
16. Killough Jr BD. A Semi-empirical Cellular Automata Model for Wildfire Monitoring from a Geosynchronous Space Platform. Doctoral Dissertation. Williamsburg, VA, USA: The College of William and Mary; 2003.
17. Goessmann F. Improved Spatial Resolution of Bushfire Detection with MODIS. Doctoral Dissertation. Perth, Australia: Curtin University; 2007.
18. Guanter L, Kaufmann H, Segl K, Foerster S, Rogass C, Chabrillat S, Kuester T, Hollstein A, Rossner G, Chlebek C, Straif C. The EnMAP spaceborne imaging spectroscopy mission for earth observation. Remote Sensing. 2015; 7 (7): 8830–8857.
19. Guaragnella C, D’Orazio T. A data-driven approach to SAR data-focusing. Sensors. 2019; 19 (7): 1649.
20. Al-Mahdi AM, Ndahi EM, Yahaya B, Maina ML. Integrated GIS and satellite remote sensing in mapping the growth, managing and production of inland water fisheries and aquaculture. Eur Sci J. 2014; 10 (6). 175–183.
21. Bryant NA, Zobrist AL. IBIS: A geographic information system based on digital image processing and image raster data type. IEEE Trans Geosci Electron. 1977; 15 (3): 152–159.
22. Mansor S. Google the Earth: What’s Next? Inaugural lecture. Selangor, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia; 2010.
23. Crespi M, De Vendictis L. A procedure for high resolution satellite imagery quality assessment. Sensors. 2009; 9 (5): 3289–3313.
24. Shen H, Jia X, Bioucas-Dias JM, Dobigeon N, Cui Y, Pacifici F. Foreword to the special issue on quality improvements of remote sensing data. IEEE J Select Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sensing. 2018; 11 (3): 687–690.
25. von der Dunk FG. Legal aspects of using space-derived geospatial information for emergency response, with particular reference to the Charter on Space and Major Disasters. In: Zlatanova S, Li J, editors. Geospatial Information Technology for Emergency Response. London, UK: CRC Press; 2008. pp. 37–56.
26. Diederiks-Verschoor IH. Current issues in remote sensing. Mich YBI Legal Stud. 1984; 5: 305.
27. Gao S, Sweeting MN, Nakasuka S, Worden SP. Issue small satellites. Proc IEEE. 2018; 106 (3): 339–342.
28. Abraham J, Wloka C. Edge detection for satellite images without deep networks. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2105.12633. May 26, 2021.
29. Wilson S. Paper Session IB – Earth Observing System. In: 27th Space Congress Proceedings, Cocoa Beach, FL, USA, April 24–27, 1990. pp. 2-35–2-37.
30. De Leeuw J, Georgiadou Y, Kerle N, De Gier A, Inoue Y, Ferwerda J, Smies M, Narantuya D. The function of remote sensing in support of environmental policy. Remote Sensing. 2010; 2 (7): 1731–1750.
31. Haubold HJ, Wamsteker W. Worldwide development of astronomy: the story of a decade of UN/ESA workshops on basic space science. arXiv preprint astro-ph/9705169. May 21, 1997.
32. Goward SN, Chander G, Pagnutti M, Marx A, Ryan R, Thomas N, Tetrault R. Complementarity of resourcesat-1 AWiFS and Landsat TM/ETM+ sensors. Remote Sensing Environ. 2012; 123: 41–56.
| Volume | 03 |
| Issue | 01 |
| Received | 28/03/2025 |
| Accepted | 29/03/2025 |
| Published | 08/04/2025 |
| Publication Time | 11 Days |