Machine Learning Approaches for Phishing Detection: A Comparative Study

Year : 2024 | Volume :02 | Issue : 01 | Page : 35-45
By

Prerana Talekar,

Akanksha Pawar,

Rutuja Yadav,

Nikita Dhamal,

  1. Student,, Shri Chhatrapati Shivajiraje College of Engineering, Dhangwadi,, Maharashtra, India
  2. Student,, Shri Chhatrapati Shivajiraje College of Engineering, Dhangwadi,, Maharashtra, India
  3. Student,, Shri Chhatrapati Shivajiraje College of Engineering, Dhangwadi,, Maharashtra, India
  4. Student,, Shri Chhatrapati Shivajiraje College of Engineering, Dhangwadi,, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

These days, everyone has an internet addiction. All of us have used the internet for banking, booking, recharging, and buying. Phishing is a type of website threat that exists online. On the original website, phishing is an attempt to illegally obtain information such as login ID, password and credit card information. In this research, we proposed an efficient phishing detection system based on machine learning. Overall, the experimental findings demonstrated that the suggested method performs best when used in tandem with support vector machine classifiers, detecting 95.66% of phishing attempts and matching webpages with just 22.5% of novel functionality. When the suggested method is contrasted with many popular phishing datasets from UCI’s repository, encouraging results are observed. Therefore, for machine learning-based phishing detection, the suggested technique is the one that is employed and chosen.

Keywords: Phishing, web, machine learning, principal component analysis, support vector machine, random forest, decision tree, naĂŻve bayes

[This article belongs to International Journal of Satellite Remote Sensing (ijsrs)]

How to cite this article:
Prerana Talekar, Akanksha Pawar, Rutuja Yadav, Nikita Dhamal. Machine Learning Approaches for Phishing Detection: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Satellite Remote Sensing. 2024; 02(01):35-45.
How to cite this URL:
Prerana Talekar, Akanksha Pawar, Rutuja Yadav, Nikita Dhamal. Machine Learning Approaches for Phishing Detection: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Satellite Remote Sensing. 2024; 02(01):35-45. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijsrs/article=2024/view=170778

References

  1. Higashino, M., et al. An Anti-phishing Training System for Security Awareness and Education Considering Prevention of Information Leakage. in 2019 5th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM). 2019.
  2. Bleau, Global Fraud and Cybercrime Forecast,. 2017.
  3. Michel Lange, V., et al., Planning and production of grammatical and lexical verbs in multi-word messages. PloS one, 2017. 12(11): p. e0186685- e0186685.
  4. Rahman, S.S.M.M., et al. Performance Assessment of Multiple Machine Learning Classifiers for Detecting the Phishing URLs. 2020. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  5. He, M., et al., An efficient phishing webpage detector. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011. 38(10): p. 12018-12027.
  6. Mohammad, R.M., F. Thabtah, and L. McCluskey. An assessment of features related to phishing websites using an automated technique. in 2012 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions. 2012.
  7. Abdelhamid, N., A. Ayesh, and F. Thabtah, Phishing detection based Associative Classification data mining. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014. 41(13): p. 5948-5959.
  8. Toolan, F. and J. Carthy. Feature selection for Spam and Phishing detection. in 2010 eCrime Researchers Summit. 2010.
  9. Jain, A.K. and B.B. Gupta, Towards detection of phishing websites on client-side using machine learning based approach. Telecommunication Systems, 2018. 68(4): p. 687-700.
  10. PhishTank, Phishing dataset. 2018, Verified phishing URL.
  11. Openfish, Phishing dataset. 2018.
  12. Chiew, K.L., et al., Utilisation of website logo for phishing detection. Computers & Security, 2015. 54: p. 16-26.
  13. Benavides, E., et al. Classification of Phishing Attack Solutions by Employing Deep Learning Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review. 2020. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  14. Zhang, W., et al., Two-stage ELM for phishing Web pages detection using hybrid features. World Wide Web, 2017. 20(4): p. 797-813.
  15. El-Alfy, E.-S.M., Detection of phishing websites based on probabilistic neural networks and K- medoids clustering. The Computer Journal, 2017. 60(12): p. 1745-1759.
  16. Montazer, G.A. and S. ArabYarmohammadi, Detection of phishing attacks in Iranian e-banking using a fuzzy–rough hybrid system. Applied Soft Computing, 2015. 35: p. 482-492.
  17. Wang, Y.-G., G. Zhu, and Y.-Q. Shi, Transportation spherical watermarking. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2018. 27(4): p. 2063-2077.
  18. De Maio, C., et al., Time-aware adaptive tweets ranking through deep learning. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2019. 93: p. 924-932.
  19. Fadheel WH. On Phishing: Proposing a Host-Based Multi-Layer Passive/Active Anti-phishing Approach Combating Counterfeit Websites (Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University).
  20. Chapla H, Kotak R, Joiser M. A machine learning approach for url based web phishing using fuzzy logic as classifier. In2019 International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES) 2019 Jul 17 (pp. 383-388). IEEE.
  21. Patil V, Thakkar P, Shah C, Bhat T, Godse SP. Detection and prevention of phishing websites using machine learning approach. In2018 Fourth international conference on computing communication control and automation (ICCUBEA) 2018 Aug 16 (pp. 1-5). Ieee.
  22. Thakkar HK, Sahoo PK. Towards automatic and fast annotation of seismocardiogram signals using machine learning. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2019 Nov 1;20(5):2578-89.
  23. Pandey AR, Sharma T, Basnet S, Kumar A, Setia S. An Effective Phishing Site Prediction using Machine Learning. In2022 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS) 2022 Nov 4 (pp. 611-616). IEEE.

 


Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 02
Issue 01
Received 23/05/2024
Accepted 10/06/2024
Published 07/09/2024