Malaria Diagnosis through Conventional Methods: A Comprehensive Review

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2024 | Volume :01 | Issue : 02 | Page : –
By
vector

Ramesh Kumar,

vector

Dinesh Kumar,

vector

Rajni Tanwar,

vector

Amandeep Mor,

  1. Research Scholar, GJU&ST, Hisar, Haryana, India
  2. Associate Professor, School of Pharmacy, Desh Bhagat University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India
  3. Associate Professor, School of Pharmacy, Desh Bhagat University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India
  4. Research Scholar, Om Sterling Global University, Hisar, Haryana, India

Abstract document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_114292’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

The incidence of drug-resistant parasite strains is rising, there is an apparent increase in the number of cases of malaria worldwide, and in a small number of cases and there has been a dramatic rise in international migration and travel. Over 1 million people die from malaria every year; 90% of these deaths are in African children, who live in tropical and subtropical regions. Although there are now efficient techniques to treat malaria, the disease is nevertheless becoming more prevalent for a variety of reasons. The therapy and control of malaria in this emergency circumstance depends on quick and accurate diagnostic techniques. Accurate diagnosis is essential in guiding appropriate treatment and improving patient outcomes. In recent years, advancements in technology have led to the development of new diagnostic tools, including genetic testing and molecular imaging, which have improved the accuracy and efficiency of diagnosis. However, clinical diagnosis remains a complex and challenging process, requiring careful consideration of patient history, symptoms, and test results. This abstract highlight the Leishman stain, Gram stain, and field A and B stain.

Keywords: Malaria, Diagnostic, Leishman stain, Gram stain, Parasite

[This article belongs to International Journal of Pathogens (ijpg)]

How to cite this article:
Ramesh Kumar, Dinesh Kumar, Rajni Tanwar, Amandeep Mor. Malaria Diagnosis through Conventional Methods: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Pathogens. 2024; 01(02):-.
How to cite this URL:
Ramesh Kumar, Dinesh Kumar, Rajni Tanwar, Amandeep Mor. Malaria Diagnosis through Conventional Methods: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Pathogens. 2024; 01(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijpg/article=2024/view=0

Full Text PDF

References
document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_114292’);});Edit

  1. Sato S. Plasmodium—a brief introduction to the parasites causing human malaria and their basic biology. Journal of physiological anthropology. 2021 Jan 7;40(1):1.
  2. Sinden RE, Gilles HM. The malaria parasites. InEssential Malariology, 4Ed 2017 Dec 14 (pp. 8-34). CRC Press.
  3. Sathpathi S, Mohanty AK, Satpathi P, Mishra SK, Behera PK, Patel G, Dondorp AM. Comparing Leishman and Giemsa staining for the assessment of peripheral blood smear preparations in a malaria-endemic region in India. Malaria journal. 2014 Dec;13:1-5.
  4. Gregersen T. Rapid method for distinction of Gram-negative from Gram-positive bacteria. European journal of applied microbiology and biotechnology. 1978 Jun;5:123-7.
  5. Halebian S, Harris B, Finegold SM, Rolfe RD. Rapid method that aids in distinguishing Gram-positive from Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria. Journal of clinical microbiology. 1981 Mar;13(3):444-8.
  6. Holm C, Jespersen L. A flow-cytometric gram-staining technique for milk-associated bacteria. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2003 May;69(5):2857-63.
  7. Wittekind DH. Romanowsky-giemsa stains. InConn’s Biological Stains 2020 Aug 13 (pp. 303-312). Taylor & Francis.
  8. Shalini, S. Comparision of the Peripheral Smear Examination by Leishman Stain, Fluorescent Stain and Immunochromatographic Test in Diagnosis of Malaria. Diss. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India), 2015.
  9. Krampa FD, Aniweh Y, Awandare GA, Kanyong P. Recent progress in the development of diagnostic tests for malaria. Diagnostics. 2017 Sep 19;7(3):54.
  10. White NJ, Pukrittayakamee S. Clinical malaria in the tropics. Medical journal of Australia. 1993 Aug;159(3):197-203.

Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 01
Issue 02
Received 20/10/2024
Accepted 28/10/2024
Published 27/11/2024