Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Conventional Therapy on Hamstring Tightness Among Sportspersons: A Comparative Study

Year : 2025 | Volume : 03 | Issue : 02 | Page : 23 27
    By

    Ashish Kumar,

  • Jahanvi Dave,

  1. Faculty, Department of Nursing, Guru Kashi University, Punjab, India
  2. Researcher, Department of Nursing, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Haryana, India

Abstract

Background: Hamstring tightness is a frequent musculoskeletal concern among athletes, often contributing to limited flexibility, decreased performance levels, and a higher likelihood of sustaining injuries. Muscle energy technique (MET) has gained attention as a therapeutic approach aimed at enhancing muscle length and improving overall function. Objective: This study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the MET with that of traditional physiotherapy methods in alleviating hamstring tightness in sportspersons. Methods: A total of thirty individuals between 18 and 40 years of age who were presented with hamstring tightness were selected using random sampling at the Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Mullana, Haryana. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A received MET intervention, while Group B was treated with conventional physiotherapy, including static stretching and cryotherapy. The intervention lasted for 15 days. Outcome measures included the Active Knee Extension (AKE) Test and the Back-Saver Sit and Reach (BSSR) Test, recorded pre- and post-intervention. Data was analyzed using SPSS (version 21.0) with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Both MET and conventional therapy groups showed statistically significant improvements in AKE and BSSR scores (p = 0.001). The MET group demonstrated slightly greater mean improvement in flexibility compared to conventional therapy. Conclusion: MET and conventional therapy are effective in reducing hamstring tightness; however, MET provides a more efficient and quicker improvement in muscle flexibility among sportspersons.

Keywords: Muscle energy technique, conventional therapy, hamstring tightness, sportspersons, flexibility, physiotherapy

[This article belongs to International Journal of Orthopedic Nursing and Practices ]

How to cite this article:
Ashish Kumar, Jahanvi Dave. Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Conventional Therapy on Hamstring Tightness Among Sportspersons: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Orthopedic Nursing and Practices. 2025; 03(02):23-27.
How to cite this URL:
Ashish Kumar, Jahanvi Dave. Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Conventional Therapy on Hamstring Tightness Among Sportspersons: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Orthopedic Nursing and Practices. 2025; 03(02):23-27. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijornp/article=2025/view=235497


References

  1. Campa F, Coratella G. Athlete or non-athlete? This is the question in body composition. Front Physiol. 2021;12:814572. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.814572. PubMed: 34975550; PMCID: PMC8718693.
  2. Pfirrmann D, Herbst M, Ingelfinger P, Simon P, Tug S. Analysis of injury incidences in male professional adult and elite youth soccer players: a systematic review. J Athl Train. 2016;51:410–424. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-51.6.03. PubMed: 27244125; PMCID: PMC5013706.
  3. Thomas E, Cavallaro AR, Mani D, Bianco A, Palma A. The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2019;27:35. doi:10.1186/s12998-019-0258-7. PubMed: 31462989; PMCID: PMC6710873.
  4. Schenk R, Adelman K, Rousselle J. The effects of the muscle energy technique on cervical range of motion. J Man Manip Ther. 1994;2:149–155. doi:10.1179/jmt.1994.2.4.149.
  5. Gibbons J. Muscle energy Techniques: A Practical Guide for Physical Therapists. Berkeley (CA): North Atlantic Books; 2013.
  6. Aleem A, Arfan MT, Razzaq A, Khizar RH, Ali M. Effectiveness of post-isometric relaxation versus reciprocal inhibition technique on hamstring muscle flexibility. Ann King Edward Med Univ. 2022;28:205–209. doi:10.21649/akemu.v28i2.5112. Accessed 2025 Nov 25.
  7. Narayanan SL. Textbook of Therapeutic Exercises. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2005. doi:10.5005/jp/books/10958.
  8. Chaurasia BD. Human Anatomy: Lower Limb, Abdomen and Pelvis. 8th edition. New Delhi: CBS Publishers & Distributors; 2019.
  9. Devi TM, Vishwanath S. Prevalence of hamstring muscle tightness among undergraduate physiotherapy students from Dakshina Kannada District. Int J Phys Educ Sports Health. 2023;10:382–385.
  10. Raza A, Ijaz A, Saqib MS, Zahoor IA, Ahmed I, Abid N. Effectiveness of hamstring stretching versus muscle energy technique on hamstring flexibility in patients with non-specific knee pain: a randomized clinical trial. Healer J Physiother Rehabil Sci. 2023;3:671–681. doi:10.55735/hjprs.v3i7.187. Accessed 2025 Nov 25.
  11. Bhutta AH, Haneef K, Shah S, Fahad M, Khan AA, Sana J, et al. Comparative analysis of muscle energy techniques and hamstring Nordic lower training on hamstring tightness and agility run test in young athletes. Sport Sci Health. 2024;20:899–904. doi:10.1007/s11332-024-01171-2.
  12. Patel A, Patel N, Patel M. Immediate effects of muscle energy technique versus myofascial release technique on hamstring flexibility in footballers: a comparative study. Int J Sci Res. 2023;12:240–245. doi:10.21275/SR23703123353.
  13. Balasubramaniam A, Gandhi M, Kumar RK, Vasanthi RK, Purushothaman VK. Myofascial release therapy versus muscle energy technique on hamstring flexibility in physically inactive students: a randomized controlled trial. Univ J Public Health. 2022;10:299–303. doi:10.13189/ujph.2022.100403.
  14. Rojhani-Shirazi Z, Salimifard MR, Barzintaj F. Comparison of the effects of static stretching and muscle energy technique on hamstring flexibility, pain, and function in athletes with patellofemoral pain. J Adv Pharm Educ Res. 2021;11(Suppl 1):33–38.
  15. Kalanekar TA, Koley S. A comparative study of Mulligan’s bent leg raise versus muscle energy technique in asymptomatic individuals with hamstring tightness. EAS J Orthop Physiother. 2020;2:18–23.
  16. Rabia K, et al. Immediate effect of muscle energy technique in comparison with passive stretching on hamstring flexibility. Isra Med J. 2019;11(4):310–313.
  17. Balani S, Kataria C. Comparing effectiveness of suboccipital muscle energy technique alone, passive hamstring stretching alone and combination of both for improving hamstring flexibility. Int J Health Sci Res. 2015;5:329–336.
  18. Talapalli R, Sheth MS. Comparison of muscle energy technique and post-isometric relaxation on hamstring flexibility in healthy young individuals with hamstring tightness. Int J Health Rehabil Sci. 2014;3:65–68. doi:10.5455/ijhrs.000000054.
  19. Heshmatipour M, Esfandiari A, Kazemi Naeini M, Raei M, Firoozpur O, Shariatinia N, Hushmandi K. Effect of active dynamic versus passive static stretching on hamstring muscle tightness in healthy female students: a randomized trial study. Hosp Pract Res. 2019;4:134–138. doi:10.15171/hpr.2019.27.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 03
Issue 02
Received 19/11/2025
Accepted 22/11/2025
Published 29/11/2025
Publication Time 10 Days
60

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics