Jinesh B. Shah,
Kailashkumar P. Vala,
- Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Atmiya University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
- Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Atmiya University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
Abstract
The increasing demand for micro-parts in high-tech products, such as micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) applications and micro-electronic devices, has driven significant advancements in micromachining technologies. Among the various micromachining processes, the fabrication of accurate microholes and pins is critical for the performance and reliability of miniature components. Micro-hole drilling plays a vital role by enabling the production of deep holes with excellent straightness, roundness, and surface quality. It is widely used in precision industries, including the manufacturing of watch components, camera parts, and automotive fuel injection nozzles. Electrical discharge machining (EDM), a non-contact machining process suitable for electrically conductive materials, is highly effective for producing high aspect ratio holes and is extensively utilized in the tool and die manufacturing sector. This study focuses on investigating the micro-EDM drilling process parameters for machining AISI 304 stainless steel using a 1 mm diameter brass electrode. The key input parameters analyzed are peak current (Ip), pulse-on-time (Ton), and pulse-off-time (Toff), while the primary output responses are tool wear rate (TWR) and material removal rate (MRR). A central composite design (CCD) combined with response surface methodology (RSM) has been employed to develop predictive models for performance characteristics. A three-level full factorial experimental design was implemented to systematically study the influence of drilling parameters. Multi-response optimization was carried out using the desirability function approach to identify the optimal combination of machining parameters that simultaneously minimize tool wear and maximize material removal rate. Finally, experimental validation of the optimized conditions will be conducted to confirm the effectiveness and reliability of the developed models. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to improved efficiency and precision in micro-EDM drilling processes for industrial applications.
Keywords: EDM drill, AISI304, material removal rate, tool wear rate, RSM, optimization.
[This article belongs to International Journal of Manufacturing and Production Engineering ]
Jinesh B. Shah, Kailashkumar P. Vala. Optimization of Process Parameters for AISI 304 Using Micro-EDM Drilling Process Through Response Surface Method. International Journal of Manufacturing and Production Engineering. 2025; 03(01):37-47.
Jinesh B. Shah, Kailashkumar P. Vala. Optimization of Process Parameters for AISI 304 Using Micro-EDM Drilling Process Through Response Surface Method. International Journal of Manufacturing and Production Engineering. 2025; 03(01):37-47. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijmpe/article=2025/view=0
References
1.
Thanigaivelan R, Arunachalam R, Natarajan N. Study on influence of electrodes in electric discharge machining. Recent Pat Mech Eng. 2015;8(2):161–7. doi:10.2174/2212797608666150610 220531.
2.
Jahan MP, Wong YS, Rahman M. A comparative experimental investigation of deep-hole micro-EDM drilling capability for cemented carbide (WC-Co) against austenitic stainless steel (SUS 304). Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2010;46:1145–60. doi:10.1007/s00170-009-2167-8.
3.
Kaushik N, Jha SK, Anand RS. Effect of input process parameters on MRR in micro EDM drilling of CFRP sheet using RSM. Mater Today Proc. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.10.051.
4.
Singh S, Verma M. A parametric optimization of electric discharge drill machine using Taguchi approach. J Eng Comput Appl Sci. 2012;1(3):39–48.
5.
Ali SM. Influence of electrodes and parameters on micro-EDM drilling performances of 304L stainless steel. 2019 2nd International Conference on Engineering Technology and its Applications (IICETA), Al-Najef, Iraq. 2019. p. 55–60. doi:10.1109/IICETA47481.2019.9012975.
6.
Vijayanand MS, Ilangkumaran M. Optimization of micro-EDM parameters using grey-based fuzzy logic coupled with the Taguchi method. Mater Technol. 2017;51(6):989–95.
7.
Vala K, Shah JB. Optimization of process parameters for AISI 304 using micro-EDM drilling process: a review. J Mater Metall Eng. 2023 Dec;13(3):26–37. doi:10.37591/jomme.v13i3.7514.
8.
Singh AK, Mahajan R, Tiwari A, Kumar D, Ghadai RK. Effect of dielectric on electrical discharge machining: A review. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2018;377(1):012184. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012184.
9.
’Urso G, Giardini , Ravasio . E ects o electrode and wor piece materials on the sustainability of micro-EDM drilling process. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. 2018;19:1727–34. doi:10.1007/s12541-018-0200-2.
10.
Abdudeen A, Abu Qudeiri JE, Kareem A, Ahammed T, Ziout A. Recent advances and perceptive insights into powder-mixed dielectric fluid of EDM. Micromachines. 2020;11:754. doi:10.3390/mi11080754. PMID: 32752064.
11.
Ramaswamy A, Perumal AV. Multi-objective optimization of drilling EDM process parameters of LM13 Al alloy– Zr ₂–5TiC hybrid composite using RSM. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2020;42:1–18.
12.
Dewangan S, Deepak Kumar S, Kumar Jha S, Kumar Biswas C. Optimization of micro-EDM drilling parameters of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Mater Today Proc. 2020;33:5481–5. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.307.
13.
’Urso G, Maccarini G, Quarto M, Ravasio . Investigation on power discharge in micro-EDM stainless steel drilling using different electrodes. J Mech Sci Technol. 2015;29:4341–9. doi:10.1007/s12206-015-0932-1.
14.
Sahoo AK, Mishra DR. Multi-attribute optimization of EDM drilling process parameters on Nitinol using GRA-assisted PSO. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Architectural Sciences and Applications Symposium (IArcSAS-2022); 2022 Sep 9–11; Baku, Azerbaijan. p. 1259–76.
15.
Liu Y, Wang C, Yang X, Sun F, Song J. Fracture behaviour of the 304 stainless steel with micro-EDMed micro-holes. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2020;42:1–9.
| Volume | 03 |
| Issue | 01 |
| Received | 26/03/2025 |
| Accepted | 14/05/2025 |
| Published | 24/05/2025 |
| Publication Time | 59 Days |
[first_name] [last_name]
