Pelvic Floor Muscle Strengthening in Antenatal Period Among Primigravida Cases at Jorhat, Assam

Year : 2025 | Volume : 03 | Issue : 01 | Page : 35 42
    By

    Bandita Goswami,

  • Ankur Jyoti Bora,

  • Ankita Kalita,

  1. Researcher, Department of Physiotherapy, Jorhat Medical College, Jorhat Medical College and Hospital, Assam, India
  2. Senior Physiotherapist cum course Coordinator, Department of physiotherapy, Jorhat Medical College and Hospital, Assam, India
  3. Lecturer, Department of Physiotherapy, Jorhat Medical College, Jorhat Medical College and Hospital, Assam, India

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strengthening exercises during the antenatal period among primigravida women in Jorhat, Assam, with a focus on improving pelvic floor muscle strength and its impact on pregnancy outcomes. Purpose: To assess whether pelvic floor muscle exercises (specifically Kegel exercises) can enhance PFM strength in pregnant women, using the Modified Oxford Grading Scale (MOS), and to compare these effects with a control group receiving standard antenatal care without specific exercises. Methodology: This case-control study was carried out at Jorhat Medical College and Hospital (JMCH) in Assam. A total of 14 primigravida women aged 20–30 years, with gestational ages between 20 and 24 weeks, were recruited and divided into two groups: Group A (experimental) and Group B (control). Group A engaged in daily Kegel exercises for 12 weeks, while Group B received routine antenatal care without specific exercises. PFM strength was evaluated through vaginal palpation and the Modified Oxford Grading Scale (MOS) at both the beginning and conclusion of the study. Data were analyzed using independent and paired t-tests, with statistical significance determined at p<0.05. Results: The mean age of participants in Group A was 22.14 years (SD=1.95), and in Group B, 25.00 years (SD=3.16). Pre-intervention PFM strength (Pre_1) was comparable between the two groups (p=0.718). Post-intervention scores (Post_1) showed significant improvement in Group A (mean Post_1 score of 4.29) compared to Group B (mean Post_1 score of 2.57), with a statistically significant difference between groups (p<0.001). Within Group A, a significant increase in PFM strength was observed post-intervention (p=0.002), while Group B showed no significant change (p=0.356). Conclusion: Pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercises, particularly Kegel exercises, performed during the antenatal period, significantly improved pelvic floor muscle strength in primigravida women. These findings suggest that incorporating PFM exercises into antenatal care can have positive outcomes on maternal health. Further research with larger sample sizes is recommended to validate these results.

Keywords: Pelvic floor muscles (PFM), antenatal exercises, pregnancy outcomes, Modified Oxford Grading Scale (MOS), Kegel exercises

[This article belongs to International Journal of Midwifery Nursing And Practices ]

How to cite this article:
Bandita Goswami, Ankur Jyoti Bora, Ankita Kalita. Pelvic Floor Muscle Strengthening in Antenatal Period Among Primigravida Cases at Jorhat, Assam. International Journal of Midwifery Nursing And Practices. 2025; 03(01):35-42.
How to cite this URL:
Bandita Goswami, Ankur Jyoti Bora, Ankita Kalita. Pelvic Floor Muscle Strengthening in Antenatal Period Among Primigravida Cases at Jorhat, Assam. International Journal of Midwifery Nursing And Practices. 2025; 03(01):35-42. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijmnp/article=2025/view=222189


References

  1. Rosner J, Samardzic T, Sarao MS. Physiology, Female Reproduction. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan. [Updated 2024 Mar 20]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.
    gov/books/NBK537132/
  2. Shahshahan Z, Mehrabian F, Mashoori S. Effect of the presence of support person and routine intervention for women during childbirth in Isfahan, Iran: A randomized controlled trial. Adv Biomed Res. 2014 Jul 31; 3: doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.137865. PMID: 25221758; PMCID: PMC4162082.
  3. Bharucha AE. Pelvic floor: anatomy and function. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006 Jul; 18(7): 507– doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2006.00803.x. PMID: 16771766.
  4. Retzky SS, Rogers RM Jr. Urinary incontinence in women. Clin Symp. 1995; 47(3): 2– PMID: 8919851.
  5. Warwick R, Williams PL. Gray’s Anatomy. 35th Edn. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Longmans; 1973; 531–532.
  6. Leslie SW, Tran LN, Puckett Y. Urinary Incontinence. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan. [Updated 2024 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
    NBK559095/
  7. Hay-Smith EJ, Bø Berghmans LC, Hendriks HJ, de Bie RA, van Waalwijk van Doorn ES. Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001; (1): doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001407. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(1):CD001407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001407.pub2. PMID: 11279716.
  8. Woodley SJ, Hay-Smith EJC. Narrative review of pelvic floor muscle training for childbearing women-why, when, what, and how. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul; 32(7): 1977– doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04804-z. Epub 2021 May 5. PMID: 33950309.
  9. Vnenchak P. Pelvic Floor Muscle Training to Prevent and Treat Urinary and Fecal Incontinence in Antenatal and Postnatal Patients. Am Fam Physician. 2021 Sep 1; 104(3): 234– PMID: 34523891.
  10. Ferreira CH, Barbosa PB, de Oliveira Souza F, Antônio FI, Franco MM, Bø K. Inter-rater reliability study of the modified Oxford Grading Scale and the Peritron manometer. Physiotherapy. 2011 Jun; 97(2): 132– doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Oct 22. PMID: 21497247.
  11. Bø K, Finckenhagen HB. Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Oct; 80(10): 883– doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.801003.x. PMID: 11580731.
  12. Slieker-ten Hove MC, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Burger CW, Vierhout ME. Face validity and reliability of the first digital assessment scheme of pelvic floor muscle function conform the new standardized terminology of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009; 28(4): 295– doi: 10.1002/nau.20659. PMID: 19090583.
  13. Bø K, Sherburn M. Evaluation of female pelvic-floor muscle function and strength. Phys Ther. 2005 Mar; 85(3): 269– PMID: 15733051.
  14. Park K. Park’s Textbook of Preventive & Social Medicine. India: Banarsidas Bhanot Publishers; 2017 Jun 4.
  15. Coria-soto IL, Bobadilla JL, Notzon F. The effectiveness of antenatal care in preventing intrauterine growth retardation and low birth weight due to preterm delivery. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Feb; 8(1): 13– doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.1.13. PMID: 8680812.
  16. Nascimento SL, Surita FG, Cecatti JG. Physical exercise during pregnancy: a systematic review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec; 24(6): 387– doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328359f131. PMID: 23014142.
  17. Britnell SJ, Cole JV, Isherwood L, Sran MM, Britnell N, Burgi S, Candido G, Watson L; Canadian Physiotherapy Association; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. RETIRED: Postural health in women: the role of physiotherapy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 May; 27(5): 493– English, French. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30535-7. Erratum in: J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Aug;27(8):780. PMID: 16100646.
  18. Kramer MS, McDonald SW. Aerobic exercise for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3): doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000180.pub2. PMID: 16855953; PMCID: PMC7043271.
  19. Theofrastous JP, Swift SE. The clinical evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1998 Dec;25(4): 783– doi: 10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70043-7. PMID: 9921557.
  20. Pena CC, Bø K, de la Ossa AMP, Fernandes ACNL, Aleixo DN, de Oliveira FMF, Ferreira CHJ. Are visual inspection and digital palpation reliable methods to assess ability to perform a pelvic floor muscle contraction? An intra-rater study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Feb; 40(2): 680– doi: 10.1002/nau.24609. Epub 2021 Jan 21. PMID: 33476075.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 03
Issue 01
Received 26/12/2024
Accepted 15/02/2025
Published 05/08/2025
Publication Time 222 Days
199

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics