Strength Prediction and Optimization of Portland Limestone Cement Blended with Metakaolin and Rice Husk Ash

Year : 2025 | Volume :02 | Issue : 01 | Page : 1-14
By
vector

Musa Muhammad Jibrin,

vector

Olumide Olu Olubajo,

vector

Umar Omeiza Aroke,

  1. Scholar, Department of Chemical Engineering, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria
  2. Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria
  3. Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria

Abstract

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_148280’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

This study explores the effects of Rice Husk Ash (RHA) and Metakaolin (MK) on the compressive strength of Portland Limestone Cement (PLC) mortar, aiming to promote sustainable construction materials. RHA and MK, derived from agricultural and industrial byproducts, serve as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) that offer environmental benefits and improve cement properties. Using response surface methodology (RSM) and central composite design (CCD), the research optimized the ternary blend of PLC, RHA, and MK to develop a predictive model for compressive strength, considering factors like blending ratio, replacement level, and curing age. The blending ratio denotes the proportion of RHA and MK to PLC, the replacement level is the percentage of PLC substituted by these SCMs, and curing age is the time allowed for mortar strength development. Various mortar samples with different RHA, MK, and PLC combinations were prepared, cured, and tested for compressive strength. The results showed that higher blending ratios, increased replacement levels, and longer curing ages enhanced mortar compressive strength. The optimal conditions identified were a blending ratio of 0.53, a replacement level of 3.40 wt.%, and a curing age of 56.30 days, yielding a compressive strength of 40.30 N/mm². This demonstrates that incorporating RHA and MK in PLC blends significantly enhances mortar strength, supporting sustainable construction practices. The paper emphasizes how RHA and MK can be used as SCMs to improve mechanical qualities and promote environmental sustainability. Future studies should look into these optimized blends’ long-term durability and usefulness in diverse construction settings.

Keywords: Portland limestone cement, rice husk ash, metakaolin, compressive strength, response surface methodology, optimization

[This article belongs to International Journal of Mineral (ijmi)]

How to cite this article:
Musa Muhammad Jibrin, Olumide Olu Olubajo, Umar Omeiza Aroke. Strength Prediction and Optimization of Portland Limestone Cement Blended with Metakaolin and Rice Husk Ash. International Journal of Mineral. 2025; 02(01):1-14.
How to cite this URL:
Musa Muhammad Jibrin, Olumide Olu Olubajo, Umar Omeiza Aroke. Strength Prediction and Optimization of Portland Limestone Cement Blended with Metakaolin and Rice Husk Ash. International Journal of Mineral. 2025; 02(01):1-14. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijmi/article=2025/view=0

Full Text PDF

Full Text PDF
document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_148280’);});Edit

References

  1. Abdullahi, M. (2006). Properties of Rice Husk Ash and Its Use as a Cement Replacement Material. Cement and Concrete Research, 36(6), 1042–1050.
  2. Amarnath, K. (2017). Effect of Metakaolin on the Strength and Durability of Concrete. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 8(6), 65–75.
  3. Antoni, M., Rossen, J., Martirena, F., & Scrivener, K. (2012). Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone. Cement and Concrete Research, 42(12), 1579–1589.
  4. Badogiannis, E., Papadakis, V. G., Chaniotakis, E., & Tsivilis, S. (2005). Exploitation of poor Greek kaolins: Strength development of metakaolin concrete and evaluation by means of K-value. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(11), 1975–1983.
  5. Ben Haha, M., Lothenbach, B., Le Saout, G., & Winnefeld, F. (2011). Influence of fly ash on the hydration of Portland cement blends. Cement and Concrete Research, 41(9), 982–990.
  6. Brooks, J. J., Johari, M. A. M., & Mazloom, M. (2012). Effect of admixtures on the setting times of high-strength concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 24(3–4), 439–445.
  7. De weerdt, K., Ben Haha, M., Le Saout, G., Kyellsen, K.O., Justnes, H., and Lothenbach, B. Hydration mechanisms of ternary Portland cements containing limestone powder and fly ash cement-and-concrete-researchjournal vol. 41, 279–2913.
  8. De Weerdt, K., Kjellsen, K. O., Sellevold, E. J., & Justnes, H. (2011). Synergy between Fly Ash and Limestone Powder in Ternary Cements. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33(1), 30–38.
  9. Ganesan, K., Rajagopal, K., & Thangavel, K. (2008). Rice husk ash blended cement: Assessment of optimal level of replacement for strength and permeability properties of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 22(8), 1675–1683.
  10. Habert, G., Billard, C., Rossi, P., Chen, C., & Roussel, N. (2020). Cement production technology improvement compared to CO2 emissions reduction. Cement and Concrete Research, 124, 105819.
  11. John, V. M., Fava, C., & Pacca, S. A. (2017). Reducing the environmental impact of cement production by using ternary cement blends containing waste materials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 122, 339–346.
  12. Khatib, J. M., & Clay, R. M. (2004). Absorption characteristics of metakaolin concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(1), 19–29.
  13. Khuri, A. I., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2010). Response surface methodology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(2), 128–149.
  14. Kumar, S., Kumar, R., & Bandopadhyay, A. (2017). Innovative Use of Industrial and Agricultural Waste Materials in Building Products. Construction and Building Materials, 142, 109–117.
  15. Li, Y., Chen, B., & Yu, Q. (2019). Environmental performance of cement-based materials in construction: A life-cycle perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 379–394.
  16. Madandoust, R., Ranjbar, M. M., Moghadam, H. A., & Mousavi, S. Y. (2011). Mechanical properties and durability assessment of rice husk ash concrete. Biosystems Engineering, 110(2), 144–152.
  17. Mohamed S. Moawad, Shimaa Younis & Abd EL- Rahman Ragab (2021):Assessment of the optimal level of basalt pozzolana blended cement replacement against concrete performance. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science volume 68, Article number: 42 (2021).
  18. Matos, A. M., Sousa-Coutinho, J., & Nunes, S. (2017). Influence of metakaolin and fly ash on the performance of ternary concrete blends at early age. Construction and Building Materials, 144, 133–141.
  19. Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  20. Miller, S. A., Horvath, A., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2016). Impacts of booming concrete production on water resources worldwide. Nature Sustainability, 1(2), 69–76.
  21. Montgomery, D. C. (2012). Design and Analysis of Experiments (8th ed.). Wiley.
  22. Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., & Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2016). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (4th ed.).
  23. Olubajo, O. O, Isa Y. M., Ayeni S., Menta S. and Nwuhu W. (2020). A Study on Ordinary Portland cement blended with Rice Husk Ash and Metakaolin Path of Science, Vol.6 Issue 1 pg. 3001–3019. Available on website link: http://www.pos.org – ISSN 2413–9009.
  24. Olutoge, F. A., Adesanya, D. A., & Olateju, B. I. (2010). The effects of Nigerian rice husk ash on some engineering properties of concrete. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 2, 16–24.
  25. Rahman, M. A., Hossain, M. T., & Hasan, A. (2020). Performance of Concrete Made with Metakaolin and Silica Fume as Supplementary Cementitious Materials: A Comparative Study. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 32(5), 04020116.
  26. Ramezanianpour, A. A., Ghahari, S. A., Ahmadibeni, G., & Farzad, M. (2009). Durability and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete containing metakaolin. Construction and Building Materials, 23(5), 1556–1561.
  27. Rayaprolu, A. A., Olasunkanmi, B. S. and Folorunso, C. S. (2016). Saw Dust Ash as Partial Replacement for Cement in Concrete. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction Journal, 4 (2), 474 – 480.
  28. Sathanantham, T. (2014). Partially Replacement of Fine Aggregate by Rice Husk and Egg shell in Concrete. International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies, 3 (2), 2319–9725.
  29. Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., & Gartner, E. M. (2018). Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 2–26.
  30. Shi, C., Jiménez, A. F., & Palomo, A. (2015). New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 41(7), 750–763.
  31. Siddique, R., Kaur, D., & Rajor, A. (2017). Waste foundry sand and its leachate characteristics in concrete. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 125, 304–309.
  32. Singh, M., Ali, S., & Shrivastava, R. (2015). Effect of fly ash and metakaolin on pervious concrete properties. Procedia Engineering, 122, 618–623.
  33. Taylor-Lange, S. C., Lamon, E., Riding, K. A., & Juenger, M. C. G. (2014). Calcined kaolinite–bentonite clay blends as supplementary cementitious materials. Applied Clay Science, 101, 87–93.
  34. Tsion Amsalu Fode, Yusufu Abeid Chande Jande, Thomas Kivevele (2024): Effect of Natural Pozzolana on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Concrete. Advances in
  35. (2017). Sustainable Construction and Buildings. United Nations Environment Programme.
  36. Yohanna K. Abimiku, Charles Arome Oguche and C. B. Wali (2023): Experimental Research on Natural Pozzolan as Cement Replacement, ABUAD International Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 3(1):28–33, DOI:10.53982/aijnas.2023.0301.06-j
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 02
Issue 01
Received 26/11/2024
Accepted 13/12/2024
Published 14/01/2025
135