A Comprehensive Review of Alternative Medicine: Biological Plausibility, Testability, Repeatability, and Effectiveness

Year : 2025 | Volume : 02 | Issue : 01 | Page : 32-46
    By

    Mohd. Wasiullah,

  • Piyush Yadav,

  • Shivanand Yadav,

  • Sumit Kumar Yadav,

  1. Principal, Dept.of Pharmacy,Prasad Institute of Technology, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  2. Academic Head, Dept.of Pharmacy,Prasad Institute of Technology, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  3. Assistant Professor, Dept.of Pharmacy,Prasad Institute of Technology, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  4. Scholar, Dept.of Pharmacy,Prasad Institute of Technology, Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Alternative medicine, encompassing practices, such as acupuncture, herbal remedies, homeopathy, chiropractic care, Ayurveda, and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), has gained global popularity as patients seek non-conventional healthcare solutions. Despite its widespread use, scientific evaluation of its biological plausibility, testability, repeatability, and effectiveness remains a significant challenge. This review critically examines these four criteria to assess the validity and reliability of alternative therapies. Acupuncture demonstrates partial plausibility, with evidence suggesting its ability to modulate pain pathways, though the concept of qi lacks empirical support. Herbal medicine shows promise due to pharmacologically active compounds, yet variability in standardization hinders consistent results. Homeopathy faces significant criticism for its lack of biological plausibility, with its effects often indistinguishable from placebo. Chiropractic care provides limited benefits for musculoskeletal pain but lacks evidence for broader health claims. Similarly, Ayurveda and TCM are challenged by individualized approaches and pre-scientific frameworks, though certain herbs and practices show pharmacological potential. Testability is a recurring issue across modalities due to variability in protocols, reliance on anecdotal evidence, and patient-specific factors. The repeatability of results is often limited by inconsistent methodologies, product quality, and practitioner variability. Effectiveness is largely condition-dependent, with alternative medicine offering relief for chronic pain and stress but failing to consistently meet the rigorous standards of conventional medicine. This review underscores the need for rigorous scientific investigation to bridge the gap between traditional knowledge and modern medical paradigms, ensuring that alternative medicine can be integrated responsibly and effectively into healthcare systems.

Keywords: Alternative medicine, acupuncture, herbal remedies, testability, effectiveness

[This article belongs to International Journal of Membranes ]

How to cite this article:
Mohd. Wasiullah, Piyush Yadav, Shivanand Yadav, Sumit Kumar Yadav. A Comprehensive Review of Alternative Medicine: Biological Plausibility, Testability, Repeatability, and Effectiveness. International Journal of Membranes. 2025; 02(01):32-46.
How to cite this URL:
Mohd. Wasiullah, Piyush Yadav, Shivanand Yadav, Sumit Kumar Yadav. A Comprehensive Review of Alternative Medicine: Biological Plausibility, Testability, Repeatability, and Effectiveness. International Journal of Membranes. 2025; 02(01):32-46. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijm/article=2025/view=198484


References

  1. Ernst E. Complementary medicine: An introduction. UK: Oxford University Press; 2002.
  2. Mills S, Bone K. Principles and Practice of Phytotherapy: Modern Herbal Medicine. Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
  3. Vickers AJ, Zollman C. ABC of complementary medicine: Acupuncture. BMJ. 1999;319(7215):172–175.
  4. Linde K, et al. Acupuncture for acute low back pain: A systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2005;21(3):185–188.
  5. Shamseer L, et al. The effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:1–13.
  6. Berman BM, et al. Acupuncture for chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(3):199–204.
  7. Coon JT, Ernst E. Herbal medicine: The evidence for efficacy. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;44(5):557–563.
  8. Barrett S. The Truth About Homeopathy. Quackwatch; 2008.
  9. Weinsier RL, Berman D. The efficacy of homeopathy: The state of the evidence. J Altern Complement Med. 2002;8(4):475–481.
  10. Tontodonati M, et al. Efficacy of herbal medicines in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63(7):673–680.
  11. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
  12. Lee JH, et al. Acupuncture for acute low back pain: A systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2013;29(2):172–178.
  13. Vickers AJ, Linde K. Acupuncture for chronic pain: Individual patient data meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2014;30(3):156–163.
  14. Khorsan R, et al. Chiropractic care for acute low back pain: A systematic review. J Chiropr Med. 2012;11(3):173–181.
  15. Sullivan MD, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine for chronic pain. J Pain. 2008;9(2):110-121.
  16. Vickers AJ, et al. Acupuncture and dry needling in the treatment of myofascial trigger point pain. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(2):117–123.
  17. Turner RJ, et al. Efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of tension-type headache: A systematic review. J Altern Complement Med. 2006;12(1):61–69.
  18. Barnes LL, et al. The role of herbs and herbal products in the treatment of depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(8):1186–1195.
  19. Ernst E, Pittler MH. Efficacy of complementary therapies in treating anxiety and depression: A systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2005;137(2):71–79.
  20. Pittler MH, et al. Efficacy of St. John’s Wort in treating depression: A meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(3):578–581.
  21. Coon JT, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine in the treatment of depression: A review of the evidence. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;27(2):139–146.
  22. Kaptchuk TJ. Acupuncture: Theory, efficacy, and practice. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(5):374–381.
  23. Moseley GL, Vlaeyen JWS. Evidence for the role of psychological factors in the treatment of chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2005;21(4):247–249.
  24. Linde K, et al. Systematic review of complementary therapies for the treatment of depression. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(6):441–445.
  25. Kuyvenhoven M, et al. Complementary medicine and its effects on mental health: A systematic review. Psychol Med. 2005;35(7):1045–1054.
  26. Sarris J, et al. Herbal medicine in the management of depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014;34(4):418–424.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 02
Issue 01
Received 14/12/2024
Accepted 03/01/2025
Published 07/01/2025
Publication Time 24 Days
Total Visits: 97


My IP

PlumX Metrics