Ants in Ecosystems and Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review

Year : 2024 | Volume : 01 | Issue : 02 | Page : 15 22
    By

    Soumik Dey Roy,

  • Sourav Singh,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Agriculture, School of Agriculture, Brainware University, Barasat,, West Bengal, India
  2. Student, Department of Entomology, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India

Abstract

Nearly 60% of the world’s habitats are underutilized. And current agricultural practices are blamed for contributing to soil carbon depletion and biodiversity loss. Climate change, habitat fragmentation, and other challenges hinder species development, leading to projected shifts in species distribution. This calls for alternative management strategies. The organizational structure of social insects, especially ants, offers a model for improved ants account for half of all insect biomass. It plays an important role in agricultural management superorganism. This article describes harvester ants and leafcutter ants, primarily the genus Lasius, and details their social structure. These ants collect plant sap with carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratios of around 40 for their own sustenance and leaves with C/N ratios of 100 for fungus gardens and brood food. Their colony activities, such as burrowing, enhance soil aeration and drainage, while their fungus cultivation supports food preservation, disease control, and waste management. Ant colonies operate far from thermodynamic equilibrium, with physical, chemical, and biological gradients influencing nutrient cycling and biomass production. Leaf-cutter ants import 85–470 kg of plant material annually, primarily rich in carbon but low in nitrogen, facilitating nitrogen fixation and nitrate reduction. In nitrogen-deficient environments, ants rely on N2-fixing microorganisms to meet nitrogen demands. As a result, harvester, leaf cutter and honeysuckle ants are managed with low nitrogen ants present a sustainable agricultural approach, reducing soil carbon degradation and preventing increases in N2O emissions.

Keywords: Social Insect Organization, Harvester Ants, Leaf-Cutter Ants, Sustainable Agriculture, Nitrogen Fixation, Soil Carbon Management

[This article belongs to International Journal of Insects ]

How to cite this article:
Soumik Dey Roy, Sourav Singh. Ants in Ecosystems and Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Insects. 2024; 01(02):15-22.
How to cite this URL:
Soumik Dey Roy, Sourav Singh. Ants in Ecosystems and Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Insects. 2024; 01(02):15-22. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/iji/article=2024/view=180415


References

  1. Benckiser G (2007). Principles behind order and sustainability in natural successions and agriculture. In: Benckiser G, Schnell S (Eds.) Biodiversity in agricultural production systems. CRC, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 349–383.
  2. Holldobler B. & Wilson EO (1990). The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  3. Singh R. Elements of Entomology. Meerut, UP, India: Rastogi Publications; 2006. p. 284.
  4. Fisher BL, Bolton B. Ants of Africa and Madagascar: A Guide to the Genera. Oakland, California, USA: University of California Press; 2016. p. 24. ISBN 9780520290891.
  5. Torgersen, TR, Bull EL (1995). Down logs as habitat for forest-dwelling ants–the primary prey of pileated woodpeckers in northeastern Oregon. Northwest Science 69: 294-303.
  6. Jeanne RL (1979). A latitudinal gradient in rates of ant predation. Ecology, 60(6), 1211-1224.
  7. Fellers JH (1987). Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecology, 68(5), 1466-1478.
  8. Lyford WH (1963). Importance of ants to brown podzolic soil genesis in New England. Harvard Forest Paper 7. Petersham, Mass. 18 pp.
  9. Gentry JB, Stiritz KL (1972). The role of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius, in old field mineral nutrient relationships. Environmental Entomology 1: 39-41.
  10. Vázquez BM (1998). Hormigas (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) colectadas en necrotrampas, en tres localidades de Jalisco, México. – Tesis de Licenciatura, centro universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara. Zapopan, Jalisco.
  11. Delfino and Buffa (2000). Algunas interacciones planta-hormiga en Córdoba (Argentina). Baetica 11: 3-15.
  12. Folgarait PJ (1998). Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: a review. Biodivers. Conserv. 7:1221-1244.
  13. Farji‐Brener AG & Werenkraut V (2017). The effects of ant nests on soil fertility and plant performance: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology, 86(4), 866-877.
  14. Way, M. J., Javier, G., & Heong, K. L. (2002). The role of ants, especially the fire ant, Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in the biological control of tropical upland rice pests. Bulletin of entomological research, 92(5), 431-437.
  15. Wheeler, W. M. 1936. Ecological relations of Ponerine and other ants to termites. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 71: 159-243.
  16. Forel, A. 1901. Sketch of the habits of North American ants. Psyche 9:231-239.
  17. Adams, C. C. 1915. An ecological study of prairie and forest invertebrates. Bull. 111. State Lab. Nat. Hist. 11:208-209.
  18. Symondson, W. O. C., Sunderland, K. D., & Greenstone, M. H. (2002). Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents?. Annual review of entomology, 47(1), 561-594.
  19. Paulson, G. S., & Akre, R. D. (1992). Evaluating the effectiveness of ants as biological control agents of pear phyla (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Journal of economic entomology, 85(1), 70-73.
  20. Way, M. J., & Heong, K. L. (2009). Significance of the tropical fire ant Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as part of the natural enemy complex responsible for successful biological control of many tropical irrigated rice pests. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 99(5), 503-512.
  21. Pascovici VD (1979). Especes du groupe Formica rufa de Roumanie et leur utilisation dans la lutte contre les ravageurs forestieres. Proceedings of the Meeting of the Working Groups on Formica rufa and Vertebrate Predators of Insects. Bulletin SROP—International Organization for Biological Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, West Palaearctic Regional Section, 2: 111-34. Varenna, Italy: West Palearctic Regional Section of the 10BC.
  22. Way, M. J., & Khoo, K. C. (1991). Colony dispersion and nesting habits of the ants, Dolichoderus thoracicus and Oecophylla smaragdina (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in relation to their success as biological control agents on cocoa. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 81(3), 341-350.
  23. Gosswald, K. (1951). Setting up a station for large-scale breeding of Formica rufa queens.
  24. Gösswald, K. (1985). Wood ants as indicators of forest diseases, with special reference to mass breeding of queens.
  25. Agarwal, V. M., Rastogi, N., & Raju, S. V. S. (2007). Impact of predatory ants on two lepidopteran insect pests in Indian cauliflower agroecosystems. Journal of Applied Entomology, 131(7), 493-500.
  26. Peng, R. K., Christian, K., & Gibb, K. (1995). The effect of the green ant, Oecophylla smaragdina (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), on insect pests of cashew trees in Australia. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 85(2), 279-284.
  27. Peng, R. K., Christian, K., & Gibb, K. (1998). How many queens are there in mature colonies of the green ant, Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius)?. Australian Journal of Entomology, 37(3), 249-253.
  28. Peng, R. K., Christian, K., & Gibb, K. (1997). Distribution of the green ant, Oecophylla smaragdina (F.)(Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in relation to native vegetation and the insect pests in cashew plantations in Australia. International journal of pest management, 43(3), 203-211.
  29. Jutsum, A. R., Cherrett, J. M., & Fisher, M. (1981). Interactions between the fauna of citrus trees in Trinidad and the ants Atta cephalotes and Azteca sp. Journal of Applied Ecology, 187-195.
  30. Way, M. J., & Khoo, K. C. (1992). Role of ants in pest management. Annual review of Entomology, 37(1), 479-503.
  31. Smith, E. S. C. (1981). An integrated control scheme for cocoa pests and diseases in Papua New Guinea. International Journal of Pest Management, 27(3), 351-359.
  32. Proctor, M., Yeo, P. and Lack, A. (1996) The Natural History of Pollination. Timber Press, Portland.
  33. Peakall, R., Handel, S.N. and Beattie, A.J. (1991) The evidence for, and importance of, ant pollination, In: C.R. Huxley and D.F. Cutler (eds.) Ant–Plant Interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 421–429.
  34. Schoonhoven, L.M., van Loon, J.J.A. and Dicke, M. (2005) Insect–Plant Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 421.
  35. Barth, F.G. (1991) Insects and Flowers. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  36. Peakall, R. (1989). The unique pollination of Leporella fimbriata (Orchidaceae): pollination by pseudocopulating male ants (Myrmecia urens, Formicidae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 167, 137-148.
  37. Garcia, M.B., Antor, R.J. and Espadaler, X. (1995) Ant pollination of the palaeoendemic dioecious Borderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 198:17–27.
  38. Gomez, J.M. and Zamora, R. (1992) Pollination by ants – Consequences of the quantitative effects on a mutualistic system. Oecologia 91:410–418.
  39. Ramsey, M. (1995) Ant pollination of the perennial herb Blandfordia grandifl ora (Liliaceae). Oikos 74:265–272.
  40. Sugiura, N., Miyazaki, S. and Nagaishi, S. (2006) A supplementary contribution of ants in the pollination of an orchid, Epipactis thunbergii, usually pollinated by hover flies. Plant Syst. Evol. 258:17–26.
  41. Puterbaugh, M.N. (1998) The roles of ants as fl ower visitors: experimental analysis in three alpine plant species. Oikos 83:36–46.
  42. Ashman, T.L. and King, E.A. (2005) Are fl ower-visiting ants mutualists or antagonists? A study in a gynodioecious wild strawberry. Am. J. Bot. 92:891–895.
  43. Brantjes, N.B.M. (1981) Ant, bee and fl y pollination in Epipactis palustris (L) Crantz (Orchidaceae). Acta Bot. Neerl. 30:59–68.
  44. Steven N. Handel and Andrew J. Beattie (1990) Seed Dispersal by Ants, Scientific American, Vol. 263, No. 2, pp. 76-83B, Scientific American, a division of Nature America, Inc., http://www.jstor.org/stable/24996901.
  45. Vander Wall, S. B., Kuhn, K. M., and Beck, M. J. (2005). Seed removal, seed predation, and secondary dispersal. Ecology 86, 801–806. doi: 10.1890/ 04-0847.
  46. Servigne, P., and Detrain, C. (2008). Ant-seed interactions: combined effects of ant and plant species on seed removal patterns. Insectes Soc. 55, 220–230. doi: 10.1007/s00040-008-0991-8.
  47. Lengyel, S., Gove, A. D., Latimer, A. M., Majer, J. D., and Dunn, R. R. (2010). Convergent evolution of seed dispersal by ants, and phylogeny and biogeography in flowering plants: a global survey. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 12, 43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2009.08.001.
  48. Leal, L. C., Lima Neto, M. C., de Oliveira, A. F., Andersen, A. N., and Leal, I. R. (2013). Myrmecochores can target high-quality disperser ants: variation in elaiosome traits and ant preferences for myrmecochorous Euphorbiaceae in Brazilian Caatinga. Oecologia. 174, 493–500. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2789-2.
  49. Sasidharan R and Venkatesan R (2019) Seed Elaiosome Mediates Dispersal by Ants and Impacts Germination in Ricinus communis. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7:246. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00246.
  50. Signe White1,2*, Levi Morran1, Jacobus de Roode1 (2017) Phoresy, Current Biology 27, R1–R3, DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.073.
  51. Krantz, G. W. (2009). Introduction. In G. W. Krantz & D. E. Walter (Eds.), A Manual of Acarology (3rd ed.), (pp. 1-2). Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press.
  52. Krantz, G. W. and D. E. Walter. (2009). Classification. In G. W. Krantz & D. E. Walter (Eds.), A Manual of Acarology (3rd ed.), (pp. 99-103). Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press.
  53. OConnor, B. M. (1982). Evolutionary ecology of astigmatid mites. Annual Review of Entomology 27, 385-409.
  54. Hunter, P.E. and R. M. T. Rosario. (1988). Associations of Mesostigmata with other arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology, 33: 393-417.
  55. Elzinga, R. J. (1978). Holdfast mechanisms in certain Uropodine mites (Acarina: Uropodina). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 71: 896-900.
  56. Collins H. L., Markin G. P. 1971 — Inquilines and other arthropods collected from nests of the imported fire ant, Solenopsis saevissima richteri — Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64: 1376-80.
  57. Ebermann E., Moser J. C. 2008 — Mites (Acari: Scutacaridae) associated with the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), from Louisiana and Tennessee, U.S.A — Internat. J. Acarol 34 (1):55-69.
  58. Khaustov A. A., Moser J. C. 2008 — Two new species of mites of the genera Petalomium Cross and Caesarodispus Mahunka (Acari: Heterostigmata: Neopygmephoridae, Microdispidae) associated with Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the U.S.A—Internat. J. Acarol 34 (2):115-121.
  59. Sokolov I. M., Sokolova Y. Y.,Fuxa J. R. 2003 — Histiostomatid mites (Histiostomatidae: Astigmata: Acarina) from female reproductives of the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) — J. Entomol. Sci. 38:699-702.
  60. Turaki JM, Turaki ZGS, Maidoki MK (2006). Spacio-temporal behaviours of harvester ant (Messor galla Forel) in response to different food grains. Niger. J. Exp. Appl. Bio., 7(2): 199-204.
  61. Heathwole H (1996). Ant Assemblages at their dry limits, the northern Alacama Deserts, Pere and the Chott EL-Djerid. Tunisia. J. Arid Environ., 33: 449-456.
  62. Natural Resources Institute (NRI) (1996). Insects of Nigerian Crops: Identification, Biology and control. FMA/ODA, 253 p.
  63. Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) (2009). Statistical Bulletin 5(1).
  64. Zakari Goji Silas Turaki1*, Joy Zakari Turaki2, Joshua Dalli Zira2 and Abba Bukar Abba-Masta2 (2012), Estimation of haulage capacity and nest activity of different sizes of harvester ant (Messor galla forel) for major small grain cereals in Nigeria, Journal of Stored Products and Postharvest Research Vol. 3(7), pp. 83 – 86,2012 DOI: 10.5897/JSPPR11.060.
  65. Warburg I (2000). Preference of seeds and seed particles by Messor arenarius (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) during food choice experiments. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 93(5):1095-1099.
  66. Guillaume Chomicki and Susanne S. Renner (2016) Obligate plant farming by a specialized ant. Department of Biology, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Str. 67, Munich 80638, Germany. DOI: 10.1038/NPLANTS.2016.181.
  67. Chomicki, G., Staedler, Y. M., Schönenberger, J. & Renner, S. S. New Phytol. 211,1358–1370 (2016).
  68. Tschinkel WR (1999) Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: distribution of workers, brood and seeds within the nest in relation to colony size and season. Ecol Entomol 24: 222±237.
  69. Tschinkel WR (1999) Sociometry and sociogenesis of colony-level attributes of the Florida harvester ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 92: 80±89.
  70. MacKay WP (1981) A comparison of the nest phenologies of three species of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 88: 25–74.
  71. MacKay WP, MacKay EE (1984) Why do harvester ants store seeds in their nests? Sociobiology 9: 31–47.
  72. Willard, J. R., & Crowell, H. H. (1965). Biological activities of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex owyheei, in central Oregon. Journal of Economic Entomology, 58(3), 484-489.
  73. Lavigne RJ (1969). Bionomics and nest structure of Pogonomyrmex occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Annal of the Entomological Society of America, 62(5), 1166-1175.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 01
Issue 02
Received 23/10/2024
Accepted 25/10/2024
Published 28/10/2024
380


My IP

PlumX Metrics