Ashika Verma,
- Student, Faculty of Biotechnlogy, Ewing Christian College, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract
Gene drive technology has emerged as a groundbreaking tool with significant potential to address critical global challenges, particularly in managing and preserving biodiversity. By enabling targeted alterations to the genetic makeup of species, gene drives could facilitate the control of invasive species, mitigate vector-borne diseases, and even aid in the restoration of endangered species. However, the rapid pace of development and deployment of gene drive technologies raises concerns about unintended ecological consequences, long-term sustainability, and ethical considerations. This review explores the current state of gene drive technology, its applications in biodiversity conservation, and the associated risks. We evaluate the scientific, ecological, and socio-political implications of gene drive interventions, providing a comprehensive overview of the current literature. Potential benefits include the ability to eliminate harmful invasive species, reduce disease transmission, and even potentially revive species on the brink of extinction. However, these benefits are counterbalanced by risks, such as unpredictable ecological impacts, gene flow into non-target populations, and the challenge of global governance and regulation. Furthermore, the ethical dilemmas surrounding gene drive use in conservation are explored, particularly regarding the autonomy of ecosystems and the long-term effects of genetic modifications. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for rigorous risk assessment, transparent governance frameworks, and international collaboration in the management of gene drive technologies to safeguard global biodiversity.
Keywords: Gene drive technology, biodiversity conservation, invasive species, vector-borne diseases, endangered species, sustainability, ethical considerations, genetic
[This article belongs to International Journal of Genetic Modifications and Recombinations ]
Ashika Verma. Gene Drive Technology: Potential and Risks for Global Biodiversity. International Journal of Genetic Modifications and Recombinations. 2025; 03(01):6-10.
Ashika Verma. Gene Drive Technology: Potential and Risks for Global Biodiversity. International Journal of Genetic Modifications and Recombinations. 2025; 03(01):6-10. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijgmr/article=2025/view=209885
References
1. Hammond AM, Galizi R. Gene drives to fight malaria: current state and future directions. Pathog Glob Health. 2017 Dec;111(8):412–23. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2018.1438880.
2. Burt A, Coulibaly M, Crisanti A, Diabate A, Kayondo JK. Gene drive to reduce malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. J Respon Innov. 2018 Jan 24;5(sup1):S66–80.
3. Hammond A, Galizi R, Kyrou K, Simoni A, Siniscalchi C, Katsanos D, et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae. Natur Biotech. 2016 Jan;34(1):78–83.
4. Garrood WT, Kranjc N, Petri K, Kim DY, Guo JA, Hammond AM, et al. Analysis of off-target effects in CRISPR-based gene drives in the human malaria mosquito. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2021 Jun 1;118(22):e2004838117.
5. Anderson MA, Gonzalez E, Ang JX, Shackleford L, Nevard K, Verkuijl SA, et al. Closing the gap to effective gene drive in Aedes aegypti by exploiting germline regulatory elements. Nat Commun. 2023 Jan 20;14(1):338.
6. Alphey L. Can CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives curb malaria? Natur Biotech. 2016 Feb;34(2):149–50.
7. Simoni A, Hammond AM, Beaghton AK, Galizi R, Taxiarchi C, Kyrou K, et al. A male-biased sex-distorter gene drive for the human malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Natur Biotech. 2020 Sep 1;38(9):1054–60.
8. Smidler AL, Pai JJ, Apte RA, Sánchez C HM, Corder RM, Jeffrey Gutiérrez E, et al. A confinable female-lethal population suppression system in the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae. Sci Adv. 2023 Jul 5;9(27):eade8903.
9. Hammond A, Pollegioni P, Persampieri T, North A, Minuz R, Trusso A, et al. Gene-drive suppression of mosquito populations in large cages as a bridge between lab and field. Natur Comm. 2021 Jul 28;12(1):4589.
10. Galizi R, Hammond A, Kyrou K, Taxiarchi C, Bernardini F, O’Loughlin SM, et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 sex-ratio distortion system for genetic control. Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 3;6(1):31139.
11. Macias VM, McKeand S, Chaverra-Rodriguez D, Hughes GL, Fazekas A, Pujhari S, et al. Cas9-mediated gene-editing in the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi by ReMOT Control. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2020 Apr 1;10(4):1353–60.
12. Webber BL, Raghu S, Edwards OR. Is CRISPR-based gene drive a biocontrol silver bullet or global conservation threat? Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2015 Aug 25;112(34):10565-7.
13. Adelman ZN, Tu Z. Control of mosquito-borne infectious diseases: sex and gene drive. Trends Parasito. 2016 Mar 1;32(3):219–29.
14. Bier E. Gene drives gaining speed. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2022 Jan;23(1):5–22.
15. Marshall JM, Buchman A, Sánchez C HM, Akbari OS. Overcoming evolved resistance to population-suppressing homing-based gene drives. Sci Reprt. 2017 Jun 19;7(1):3776.
| Volume | 03 |
| Issue | 01 |
| Received | 06/01/2025 |
| Accepted | 23/01/2025 |
| Published | 10/05/2025 |
| Publication Time | 124 Days |
