Integrating Social Perception and Economic Valuation for Riparian Zone Preservation: Evidence from Kiliti Watershed, Ethiopia

Year : 2026 | Volume : 04 | Issue : 01 | Page : 49 55
    By

    Haileyesus Gelaw Asres,

  1. Lecturer, Department of Forestry, College of Agriculture, Food and Climate Science, Injibara University, Ethiopia, Ethiopia

Abstract

Riparian zones play a crucial role in maintaining watershed health by providing ecosystem services such as water filtration, erosion control, biodiversity conservation, and aesthetic and cultural benefits to surrounding communities. Despite their importance, riparian areas in many developing countries are increasingly degraded due to agricultural expansion, grazing pressure, and settlement encroachment. This study integrates social perception analysis with economic valuation to assess riparian zone preservation in the Kiliti Watershed, Northwestern Ethiopia. Data was collected from 200 households across three sub-basins (Amen, Kiliti, and Gurdala) using structured questionnaires. Social perceptions of riparian ecological quality were measured using a semantic differential scale, while economic valuation was conducted using a willingness-to-accept (WTA) contingent valuation approach to estimate compensation required for participation in conservation initiatives. The results show a strong positive correlation between community perception scores and ecological quality indices (r = 0.81, p < 0.01), indicating that local communities accurately perceive riparian environmental conditions. The mean WTA for conservation participation was estimated at 3,400 Ethiopian Birr per household per year. Regression analysis revealed that education level, farm size, livestock ownership, and off-farm income significantly influenced both perception scores and WTA values. Households with higher environmental awareness and diversified income sources required lower compensation. The findings demonstrate that integrating social perception with economic valuation provides a comprehensive and cost-effective framework for participatory riparian management, supporting ecologically sustainable and socially acceptable conservation policies in the Kiliti Watershed and similar socio-ecological contexts.

Keywords: Conservation, economic valuation, ecosystem services, Ethiopia, Riparian zones, social perception

[This article belongs to International Journal of Environmental Planning and Development Architecture ]

How to cite this article:
Haileyesus Gelaw Asres. Integrating Social Perception and Economic Valuation for Riparian Zone Preservation: Evidence from Kiliti Watershed, Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental Planning and Development Architecture. 2026; 04(01):49-55.
How to cite this URL:
Haileyesus Gelaw Asres. Integrating Social Perception and Economic Valuation for Riparian Zone Preservation: Evidence from Kiliti Watershed, Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental Planning and Development Architecture. 2026; 04(01):49-55. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijepda/article=2026/view=239906


References

  1. Naiman RJ, Decamps H, McClain ME. Riparia: Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Streamside Communities. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005.
  2. Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata ZI, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, et al. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev. 2006;81:163–82. doi:10.1017/S1464793105006950.
  3. Temesgen H, Wu W, Legesse A, Yirsaw E, Bekele B. Landscape-based upstream-downstream prevalence of land-use/cover change drivers in southeastern rift escarpment of Ethiopia. Environ Monit Assess. 2018;190(3):166. doi:10.1007/s10661-018-6479-8.
  4. Alemayehu T, Hailu T, Berhanu B. Land-use change and riparian degradation in Ethiopian watersheds: Implications for ecosystem services. J Environ Manage. 2019;234:123–34.
  5. Briggs JM, Knapp AK, Blair JM, Heisler JL, Hoch GA, Lett MS, et al. An ecosystem in transition: Causes and consequences of the conversion of mesic grassland to shrubland. Bioscience. 2005;55(3):243–54. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0243:AEITCA]2.0.CO;2.
  6. Bennett NJ, Whitty TS, Finkbeiner EM. Environmental stewardship: local perceptions and community-based management of natural resources. Conserv Lett. 2017;10:130–9.
  7. Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF. Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence. Environ Resour Econ. 2001;19(2):173–210. doi:10.1023/A:1011128332243.
  8. Teshager Z, Abeje K. GIS and remote sensing based land use/land cover change detection: The case of Kility watershed. J Remote Sens GIS. 2021;10(3):282.
  9. Arsénio P, Rodríguez-González PM, Bernez I, Dias FS, Bugalho MN, Dufour S. Riparian vegetation restoration: Does social perception reflect ecological value? River Res Appl. 2020;36(6):907–20. doi:10.1002/rra.3514.
  10. Koundouri P, Pittis N, Plataniotis A. The impact of ESG performance on the financial performance of European area companies: An empirical examination. Environ Sci Proc. 2022;15(1):13. doi:10.3390/environsciproc2022015013.
Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 04
Issue 01
Received 13/09/2025
Accepted 14/02/2026
Published 25/02/2026
Publication Time 165 Days
1

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics