Investigate an Implementation Study of TI-6AL-4V Lattice-based Scaffold Design Using Finite Element Analysis

Year : 2023 | Volume : 01 | Issue : 01 | Page : 28 35
    By

    Amit Bhumarker,

  • Abhishek Singh,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Annie Institute of Technology and Research Centre, Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh, India
  2. Assistant Professor, DepartmentMechanical Engineering, Annie Institute of Technology and Research Centre, Chhindwara, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract

Implementation studies are advised to determine the effectiveness and performance of bone scaffolding in morphology, which has been demonstrated scientifically. The rehabilitation of bone defects, which is still a complex problem in orthopedic surgery, was the subject of an implementation study we provided. Biomaterial scaffolding porosity and pore size are essential in both in vivo and in vitro bone development. However, it has been linked to various drawbacks, including poor effective damping, low amounts of deformation, poor capability for absorbing energy, and mismatched bone strength and Young’s modulus (E). Therefore, metallic materials like titanium and its alloy have been studied to treat bone deformities. The research studied the mechanical characteristics of four distinct unit-cell-based architectural scaffolds. Biomaterial scaffolds with predetermined pore size and porosity were created using IntraLattice and Blender 3D software. To determine the Johnson-Cook model’s effectiveness in predicting the mechanical behavior of scaffold structures, quasi-static finite element (FE) analysis simulations using commercial CAE software were conducted. Similar to human cortical bone, the mechanical characteristics of yield strength (YS) and ultimate Young’s modulus (E) were examined. Between 2.59 and 7.65 GPa was determined to be the elastic modulus based on finite element studies.

Keywords: Porosity, pore size, unit cell, finite element analysis, scaffold

[This article belongs to International Journal of Biochemistry and Biomolecule Research ]

How to cite this article:
Amit Bhumarker, Abhishek Singh. Investigate an Implementation Study of TI-6AL-4V Lattice-based Scaffold Design Using Finite Element Analysis. International Journal of Biochemistry and Biomolecule Research. 2023; 01(01):28-35.
How to cite this URL:
Amit Bhumarker, Abhishek Singh. Investigate an Implementation Study of TI-6AL-4V Lattice-based Scaffold Design Using Finite Element Analysis. International Journal of Biochemistry and Biomolecule Research. 2023; 01(01):28-35. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijbbr/article=2023/view=107337


Browse Figures

References

1. Miao X, Graded SD. Gradient Porous Biomaterials. Materials (Basel). 2010;3(1):26–47. doi: 10.3390/ma3010026.
2. Wally Z, Van Grunsven W, Claeyssens F, Goodall R, Reilly G. Porous titanium for dental implant applications. Metals. 2015;5(4):1902–20. doi: 10.3390/met5041902.
3. Matassi F, Botti A, Sirleo L, Carulli C, Innocenti M. Porous metal for orthopedics implants. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2013;10(2):111–5.
4. Ryan GE, Pandit AS, Apatsidis DP. Porous titanium scaffolds fabricated using a rapid prototyping and powder metallurgy technique. Biomaterials. 2008;29(27):3625–35. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.032.
5. Ahsan MN, Paul CP, Kukreja LM, Pinkerton AJ. Porous structures fabrication by continuous and pulsed laser metal deposition for biomedical applications; modelling and experimental investigation. J Mater Process Technol. 2011;211(4):602–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.11.014.
6. Vesenjak M, Ren Z. Yielding and post-yield behaviour of closed-cell cellular materials under multiaxial dynamic loading. Met Mater Int. 2016;22(3):435–42. doi: 10.1007/s12540–016–5550–7.
7. Buciumeanu M, Palaghian L, Miranda AS, Silva FS. Fatigue life predictions including the Bauschinger effect. Int J Fatigue. 2011;33(2):145–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.07.012.
8. Zena JW, Grunsven WV, Claeyssens F, et al. Porous Titanium for Dental Implant Applications. In Metals. 2015; 5(4):1902-1920. https://doi.org/10.3390/met5041902.
9. Levine B. A new era in porous metals: applications in orthopaedics. Advanced Engineering Materials. Sep 2008; 10(9): 788-792..
10. Dabrowski B, Swieszkowski W, Godlinski D, Kurzydlowski KJ. Highly porous titanium scaffolds for orthopaedic applications. Journal of biomedical materials research Part B: Applied biomaterials. Oct 2010; 95(1): 53-61.
11. Yan C, Hao L, Hussein A, Raymont D. Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Int J Mach Tool Manuf. 2012;62:32–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.002.
12. Ashby M, Evans A, Fleck N, Gibson L, Hutchinson J, Wadley H, et al. Metal foams: A design guide. Appl Mech Rev. 2001;54(6):B105–6. doi: 10.1115/1.1421119.
13. Nouri A, Hodgson PD, Wen C. Biomimetic porous titanium scaffolds for orthopedic and dental applications. Published online; 2010. p. 415–51.
14. Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Adeoye AOM. 3D printing of bone scaffolds with hybrid biomaterials. Compos B Eng. 2019;158:428–36. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.065. https://doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.065.
15. Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Ismail SO, Olawade DB. Recent advances in biopolymeric composite materials: future sustainability of bone-implant. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;150. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111505.
16. Oladapo BI, Ismail SO, Adebiyi AV, Omigbodun FT, Olawumi MA, Olawade DB. Nanostructural interface and strength of polymer composite scaffolds applied to intervertebral bone. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects. 2021;627. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127190.
17. Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Omigbodun FT. A systematic review of polymer composite in biomedical engineering. Eur Polym J. 2021;154. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110534.
18. Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Ismail SO. Mechanical performances of hip implant design and fabrication with PEEK composite. Polymer. 2021;227. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123865.
19. Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA. Improving bioactivity and strength of PEEK composite polymer for bone application. Mater Chem Phys. 2021;266. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124485.
20. Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Ismail SO, Omigbodun FT. 3D printing of PEEK and its composite to increase biointerfaces as a biomedical material: A review. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021;203:111726. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111726.
21. Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Ismail SO, Omigbodun FT, Bowoto OK, Olawumi MA, et al. 3D printing of PEEK–cHAp scaffold for medical bone implant. Bio-Des Manuf. 2021;4(1):44–59. doi: 10.1007/s42242–020–00098–0.
22. Oladapo BI, Ismail SO, Bowoto OK, Omigbodun FT, Olawumi MA, Muhammad MA. Lattice design and 3D-printing of PEEK with Ca10(OH)(PO4)3 and in-vitro bio-composite for bone implant. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;165(A):50–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.175. https://doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.175.
23. Oladapo BI, Obisesan OB, Oluwole B, Adebiyi VA, Usman H, Khan A. Mechanical characterization of a polymeric scaffold for bone implant. J Mater Sci. 2020;55(21):9057–69. doi: 10.1007/s10853–020–04638-y.
24. Merkt S, Hinke C, Bültmann J, Brandt M, Xie YM. Mechanical response of TiAl6V4 lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting in quasistatic and dynamic compression tests. J Laser Appl. 2015;27(S1);Suppl 1:S17006. doi: 10.2351/1.4898835.

Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 01
Issue 01
Received 03/04/2023
Accepted 01/05/2023
Published 15/05/2023
Publication Time 42 Days
793

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics