Advances in Medical Robotics: Surgical Automation and Rehabilitation Systems

Year : 2025 | Volume : 03 | Issue : 01 | Page : 31 38
    By

    Ashutosh Kushwaha,

  1. Sr. Engineer, Mahindra and Mahindra limited (Global Automotive product development), Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Medical robotics has emerged as a groundbreaking technology, transforming modern healthcare through advancements in surgical automation and rehabilitation systems. Robotic-assisted procedures machine learning (ML), and artificial intelligence (AI) have all been used to improve patient recovery consequences, reduce invasiveness, and increase surgical precision. These developments have redefined traditional medical techniques by opening the door for more effective, precise, and tailored therapies. By improved dexterity, stability, and vision, surgical robots has transformed minimally invasive techniques and given surgeons greater influence over intricate surgeries. Patients who experience robotic-assisted procedures, including those carried out with the da Vinci Surgical System, cite fewer problems, shorter hospital stays, and easier recovery periods. Additionally, AI-powered robotic platforms are now capable of assisting in preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative assessments, further optimizing surgical efficiency. Robotic advances in rehabilitation have substantially improved the quality of life for people mending from musculoskeletal disabilities, injuries to the spine, and neurological disorders. Robotic exoskeletons and assistive devices help restore mobility, enhance motor functions, and promote faster rehabilitation through real-time adaptive support and patient-specific therapy. The integration of ML algorithms enables these systems to personalize treatment strategies, ensuring better outcomes for individuals undergoing physical therapy. Notwithstanding these outstanding developments, obstacles including exorbitant prices, moral dilemmas, obtaining governments permissions, and the requirement for specific training prohibit broad acceptance. Furthermore, ensuring the seamless interaction between robotic systems and human professionals remains a critical area of ongoing research. This review delves into the latest developments in medical robotics, analyzing the impact of AI-driven automation in surgery and rehabilitation. It also discusses existing challenges and future prospects, highlighting the potential of robotics to further revolutionize patient care and redefine the standards of modern medical practice.

Keywords: Medical robotics, surgical automation, rehabilitation robotics, robot-assisted surgery, exoskeleton technology, artificial intelligence in healthcare

[This article belongs to International Journal of Advanced Robotics and Automation Technology ]

How to cite this article:
Ashutosh Kushwaha. Advances in Medical Robotics: Surgical Automation and Rehabilitation Systems. International Journal of Advanced Robotics and Automation Technology. 2025; 03(01):31-38.
How to cite this URL:
Ashutosh Kushwaha. Advances in Medical Robotics: Surgical Automation and Rehabilitation Systems. International Journal of Advanced Robotics and Automation Technology. 2025; 03(01):31-38. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijarat/article=2025/view=208491


References

  1. Hockstein NG, Karas DE, Pugliese K, et al. Robotic surgery: A current review. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96(6): 432–438.
  2. Zinn PO, Park S, Hasegawa K, et al. Robotic surgical systems: Advances and challenges. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(5): 722–734.
  3. Reiner B, Roth J, Tewari A. Robotic surgery: History, current state, and future trends. Urol Clin North Am. 2012;39(2): 175–190.
  4. Munsif SI, Rehman B, Ali M. Robotic technology in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Innov. 2015;22(6): 707–712.
  5. Liu Y, Xu Y, Zhang P, et al. Robotic assisted surgery in urology: A comprehensive review. Urology. 2014;83(5): 931–937.
  6. Ashrafian H, Darzi A. The role of robotics in surgery. Br Med Bull. 2016;118(1): 1–12.
  7. Chedid MF, Glickman SR. Robotic surgery in the era of personalized medicine. Urol Clin North Am. 2018;45(1): 89–97.
  8. McLeod MP, Anderson E, Robison M. A study of robotic exoskeletons in rehabilitation therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2017;54(2): 179–188.
  9. Rykman EA, Weir RC, Wilson GA, et al. Advancements in robotic exoskeleton technology: From development to clinical application. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(4): 312–318.
  10. Kim SJ, Cho HJ, Jung KI, et al. Robotic exoskeletons for lower limb rehabilitation: A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(6): 521–528.
  11. Bogue R. Robotics in rehabilitation: A review of the latest developments. Ind Robot. 2016;43(2): 147–156.
  12. Kourtesis P, Slade A, Bicknell K, et al. Virtual reality in rehabilitation: The current state and future directions. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(7): 549–561.
  13. Medina L, Fessler D, Schaffner A, et al. Virtual reality rehabilitation systems: An overview and trends. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1): 72.
  14. Volpe B, Nef T, Sutter M, et al. Neurorehabilitation robotics: Current state and future trends. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1): 55.
  15. Fong K, Li Y, Lee J, et al. Advanced robotic rehabilitation systems: Integrating neuromuscular therapy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30(7): 619–630.
  16. Heinemann AW, McLellan DL, Riegler KA, et al. The role of robotic devices in neurorehabilitation: A review. Brain Inj. 2016;30(12): 1569–1581.
  17. Prabhu S, Li J, Lee M, et al. Developing cost-effective robotic systems for rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2017;54(4): 507–518.
  18. Yeo S, Phan D, Lee C, et al. Advances in haptic feedback systems for robotic rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1): 58.
  19. Tabb LP, Lestard SG, Boehm Y, et al. The future of medical robotics in healthcare: Challenges and opportunities. J Med Eng Technol. 2020;44(1): 1–14.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 03
Issue 01
Received 05/02/2025
Accepted 15/02/2025
Published 08/03/2025
Publication Time 31 Days
194

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics