Sameer Mohamed,
S.V. Lakshmi Priya,
Priya Sasidharan,
Arevu Chelvi Sundarom,
- Architect, Department of Architecture, MEASI Academy of Architecture, Tamil Nadu, India
- Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, MEASI Academy of Architecture, Tamil Nadu, India
- Professor, Department of Architecture, MEASI Academy of Architecture, Tamil Nadu, India
- Professor, Department of Architecture, MEASI Academy of Architecture, Tamil Nadu, India
Abstract
This research explores how biomimicry can transform building envelopes to create comfortable indoor climates, particularly in India’s hot, dry regions. With rising temperatures and dense urbanization, conventional buildings heavily reliant on air conditioning are unsustainable. Biomimicry, inspired by nature’s designs, offers an alternative to enhance adaptability, resilience, and energy efficiency in climate-responsive buildings. The study bridges the gap between conventional envelope design and climate adaptability by examining biomimetic principles for indoor temperature regulation. The methodology categorizes case studies based on biomimicry type, envelope design, and climate zones. Case studies, both international and Indian, are assessed using three parameters: biomimicry (biomimicry form/process), envelope design (materials, construction techniques, technologies, and design strategies), and thermal comfort (comfort strategies and thermal performance). Findings reveal that nature-inspired designs, such as adaptive shading and passive cooling, improve thermal comfort while reducing dependence on artificial climate control. Static biomimetic envelopes rely on envelope design (25–40%), thermal strategies (20%), and biomimicry (10%) for performance. In dynamic biomimetic envelopes, envelope design remains dominant (37–40%), while thermal strategies (25%) and biomimicry (12%) further enhance efficiency (vide my dissertation findings). Despite challenges like limited resources and awareness, biomimicry presents a promising path for sustainable architecture in India. This research concludes that integrating biomimetic principles into building envelopes fosters sustainable, adaptable, and comfortable spaces. By learning from nature, architects can design buildings that harmonize with the environment, promoting human comfort and environmental well-being while reducing reliance on energy-intensive cooling systems.
Keywords: Biomimicry, thermal comfort, static and dynamic envelope design, thermal performance
[This article belongs to International Journal of Architectural Design and Planning ]
Sameer Mohamed, S.V. Lakshmi Priya, Priya Sasidharan, Arevu Chelvi Sundarom. Exploring Envelope Design Through a Biomimetic Approach for Enhanced Thermal Comfort. International Journal of Architectural Design and Planning. 2025; 03(02):79-110.
Sameer Mohamed, S.V. Lakshmi Priya, Priya Sasidharan, Arevu Chelvi Sundarom. Exploring Envelope Design Through a Biomimetic Approach for Enhanced Thermal Comfort. International Journal of Architectural Design and Planning. 2025; 03(02):79-110. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijadp/article=2025/view=235045
References
1. Lidia Badarnath. Form Follows Environment: Biomimetic Approaches to Building Envelope Design for Environmental Adaptation. Biomimetics in Sustainable Architectural and Urban Design. Buildings 2017, 7, 40; doi:10.3390/buildings7020040.
2. Lidia Badarnah & Usama Kadri. A methodology for the generation of biomimetic design concepts, Architectural Science Review, 2014, DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2014.922458
3. Janine M. Benyus.Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. New York: Perennial; 1997.
4. Azza Elsakksa, Ola Marouf, Mai Madkour. Biomimetic Approach for Thermal Performance Optimization in Sustainable Architecture. Case study: Office Buildings in Hot Climate Countries. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022; 1113(012004): 1755–1315. DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/1113/1/012004.
5. Nancy Yen-Wen Cheng. Council House 2 Case Study. Melbourne, Australia: City of Melbourne; 2017.
6. Sahil M, Kothari P. Case study on architecture of Lotus Temple. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2020;9(5):367-83.
7. Sabahat S, Omar A. Building envelope through biomimicry: a study on biomimetic building envelope and the affected parameters. Int Res J Modern Eng Technol Sci. 2022;4(8):245-55.
8. Karanouh A, Kerber E. Innovations in dynamic architecture: The Al-Bahr Towers—design and delivery of complex facades. J Facade Des Eng. 2015;3:185-221.
9. Koyaz M. Adaptability level of façade systems regarding façade performance. In: Interdisciplinary Perspectives for Future Building Envelopes; 2017 May 15–18; Istanbul, Turkey. Istanbul: ICBEST; 2017.
10. Elsakksa A, Marouf O, Madkour M. Biomimetic approach for thermal performance optimization in sustainable architecture: Case study—office buildings in hot climate countries. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2022;1113:012004. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1113/1/012004.
- Tokuç A, Özkaban FF, Çakır ÖA. Biomimetic facade applications for a more sustainable future. In: Kokturk G, Altun TDA, editors. Interdisciplinary Expansions in Engineering and Design with the Power of Biomimicry. London: IntechOpen; 2018. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.73021.
12. Mutlu Avinç G, Koç SN, Arslan Selçuk S. Biomimetic façade design proposal to improve thermal comfort in hot climate region. Int J Built Environ Sustain. 2024;11:27-39. doi:10.11113/ijbes.v11.n2.1226.
13. Stefan Novakovic. (April 8, 2025). How Architects Are Addressing the Climate Crisis. [online] ThreeMagazine. Available from: https://threemagazine.com/ideas/how-architects-are-getting-innovative-and-addressing-the-climate-crisis/
14. Termite inspiration for a self-cooling building, www.btp-cours.com; 2006 Feb.
International Journal of Architectural Design and Planning
| Volume | 03 |
| Issue | 02 |
| Received | 30/09/2025 |
| Accepted | 22/10/2025 |
| Published | 10/11/2025 |
| Publication Time | 41 Days |
Login
PlumX Metrics