Development and Performance Evaluation of a Polyethersulfone–Graphene Oxide Ultrafiltration Membrane for Simultaneous Drug Delivery and Virus Removal: An Experimental Investigation

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 3 | 02 | Page :
By

Tshetiz Dahal,

  1. General Physician and Clinical Researcher, Department of Medicine and Surgery,Lugansk State Medical University, Lypnia St. Rivne, Ukraine

Abstract

The development of multifunctional ultrafiltration membranes for simultaneous controlled drug delivery and viral removal has gained considerable attention in biomedical engineering, pharmaceutical sciences, and water purification. Polyethersulfone (PES) membranes offer excellent thermal, chemical, and mechanical stability; however, their hydrophobicity can limit permeability, antifouling performance, and biocompatibility. This study proposes the fabrication of PES–graphene oxide (GO) ultrafiltration membranes using the phase inversion technique, with systematic variation of GO concentration to optimize membrane performance. Physicochemical characterization will include scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, contact angle measurements, and tensile testing to evaluate morphology, functional groups, surface roughness, hydrophilicity, and mechanical properties, respectively. Water permeability and pore structure will also be assessed. Drug loading and controlled release will be investigated using a model therapeutic compound under simulated physiological conditions, while viral removal efficiency will be evaluated using an appropriate viral surrogate under standardized ultrafiltration conditions. GO incorporation is anticipated to enhance hydrophilicity, water flux, mechanical stability, drug loading, and sustained release while improving viral rejection through size-exclusion and electrostatic interactions. Statistical analysis will identify the optimal GO concentration balancing permeability, drug release, and viral removal. Overall, PES–GO membranes are expected to provide a promising multifunctional platform integrating therapeutic delivery and pathogen filtration for potential biomedical, pharmaceutical, and water purification applications.

Keywords: Polyethersulfone; Graphene Oxide; Ultrafiltration Membrane; Drug Delivery; Virus Removal; Phase Inversion; Controlled Release; Membrane Engineering.

How to cite this article: Tshetiz Dahal. Development and Performance Evaluation of a Polyethersulfone–Graphene Oxide Ultrafiltration Membrane for Simultaneous Drug Delivery and Virus Removal: An Experimental Investigation. International Journal of Membranes. 2026; 03(02):-.
How to cite this URL: Tshetiz Dahal. Development and Performance Evaluation of a Polyethersulfone–Graphene Oxide Ultrafiltration Membrane for Simultaneous Drug Delivery and Virus Removal: An Experimental Investigation. International Journal of Membranes. 2026; 03(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijm/article=2026/view=259349

References

Strathmann H, Giorno L, Drioli E. Introduction to membrane science and technology. Weinheim, Germany:: Wiley-VCH; 2011 Sep. 2. Figoli A, Cassano A, Basile A, editors. Membrane technologies for biorefining. Woodhead Publishing; 2016 Feb 19. 3. Mulder M. Basic principles of membrane technology. Springer science & business media; 2012 Dec 6. 4. Madaeni SS. The application of membrane technology for water disinfection. Water Research. 1999 Feb 1;33(2):301-8. 5. Van der Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C. Distillation vs. membrane filtration: overview of process evolutions in seawater desalination. Desalination. 2002 Jun 10;143(3):207-18. 6. Lee A, Elam JW, Darling SB. Membrane materials for water purification: design, development, and application. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology. 2016 Jan 1;2(1):17-42. 7. Geise GM, Lee HS, Miller DJ, Freeman BD, McGrath JE, Paul DR. Water purification by membranes: the role of polymer science. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics. 2010 Aug 1;48(15):1685-718. 8. Zhao C, Xu X, Chen J, Yang F. Effect of graphene oxide concentration on the morphologies and antifouling properties of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2013 Sep 1;1(3):349-54. 9. Zinadini S, Zinatizadeh AA, Rahimi M, Vatanpour V, Zangeneh H. Preparation of a novel antifouling mixed matrix PES membrane by embedding graphene oxide nanoplates. Journal of Membrane Science. 2014 Mar 1;453:292-301. 10. Liu F, Hashim NA, Liu Y, Abed MM, Li K. Progress in the production and modification of PVDF membranes. Journal of membrane science. 2011 Jun 15;375(1-2):1-27. 11. Mahmoudi E, Ng LY, Ba-Abbad MM, Mohammad AW. Novel nanohybrid polysulfone membrane embedded with silver nanoparticles on graphene oxide nanoplates. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2015 Oct 1;277:1-0. 12. Huang H, Ying Y, Peng X. Graphene oxide nanosheet: an emerging star material for novel separation membranes. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2014 Aug 5;2(34):13772-82. 13. Nair RR, Wu HA, Jayaram PN, Grigorieva IV, Geim AK. Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak–tight graphene-based membranes. Science. 2012 Jan 27;335(6067):442-4. 14. Dreyer DR, Park S, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS. The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chemical society reviews. 2009 Dec 14;39(1):228-40. 15. Marcano DC, Kosynkin DV, Berlin JM, Sinitskii A, Sun Z, Slesarev A, Alemany LB, Lu W, Tour JM. Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS nano. 2010 Aug 24;4(8):4806-14. 16. Park S, Ruoff RS. Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nature nanotechnology. 2009 Apr;4(4):217-24. 17. Peppas NA. Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. 18. Higuchi TJ. Mechanism of sustained‐action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 1963 Dec;52(12):1145-9. 19. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. International journal of pharmaceutics. 1983 May 1;15(1):25-35. 20. Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Higuchi equation: Derivation, applications, use and misuse. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2011 Oct 10;418(1):6-12. 21. Ritger PL, Peppas NA. A simple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. Journal of controlled release. 1987 Jun 1;5(1):23-36. 22. Ritger PL, Peppas NA. A simple equation for description of solute release II. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. Journal of controlled release. 1987 Jun 1;5(1):37-42. 23. Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, Georgiadis JG, Mariñas BJ, Mayes AM. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. nature. 2008 Mar 20;452(7185):301-10. 24. Elimelech M, Phillip WA. The future of seawater desalination. Energy, technology.;397:712-7. 25. Werber JR, Osuji CO, Elimelech M. Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes. Nature reviews materials. 2016 Apr 5;1(5):16018. 26. Guillen GR, Pan Y, Li M, Hoek EM. Preparation and characterization of membranes formed by nonsolvent induced phase separation: a review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2011 Apr 6;50(7):3798-817. 27. Li D, Kaner RB. Graphene-based materials. Science. 2008 May 30;320(5880):1170-1. 28. Perreault F, Fonseca de Faria A, Elimelech M. Environmental applications of graphene- based nanomaterials. Chemical Society Reviews. 2015 Aug 3;44(16):5861-96. 29. Mi B. Graphene oxide membranes for ionic and molecular sieving. Science. 2014 Feb 14;343(6172):740-2. 30. Tian M, Ma T, Goh K, Pei Z, Chong JY, Wang YN. Forward Osmosis Membranes: The significant roles of selective layer. Membranes. 2022 Sep 29;12(10):955. 31. Madaeni SS, Ghaemi N. Characterization of self-cleaning RO membranes coated with TiO2 particles under UV irradiation. Journal of Membrane Science. 2007 Oct 15;303(1- 2):221-33. 32. Flemming HC. Reverse osmosis membrane biofouling. Experimental thermal and fluid science. 1997 May 1;14(4):382-91. 33. Van Reis R, Zydney A. Membrane separations in biotechnology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2001 Apr 1;12(2):208-11. 34. Yang Y, Zhang H, Wang P, Zheng Q, Li J. The influence of nano-sized TiO2 fillers on the morphologies and properties of PSF UF membrane. Journal of Membrane Science. 2007 Feb 1;288(1-2):231-8. 35. Hoek EM, Tarabara VV, editors. Encyclopedia of membrane science and technology. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated; 2013.


Ahead of Print Subscription Original Research
Volume 03
02
Received 09/06/2026
Accepted 22/09/2026
Published 05/10/2026
Publication Time 118 Days


Login

My IP

PlumX Metrics

Support