Comparative Analysis of Polymer-Enhanced and Conventional Magnetorheological Fluids in E-Bicycle Semi-Active Suspension

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 14 | 03 | Page :
    By

    Rutvik R. Pawar,

  • Aditya S. Kale,

  • Pradyumna K. Kulkarni,

  • Maya M Charde,

  • Vishal A. Bhosale,

  • Amol J. Asalekar,

  1. B. Tech Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT Academy of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  2. B. Tech Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT Academy of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  3. B. Tech Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT Academy of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  4. Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT Academy of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  5. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT Academy of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  6. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT Academy of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

In light of the increased use of electric bicycles as a sustainable transport means, various mechanical challenges emerge which were absent in traditional bicycles, primarily concerning vibration isolation and riding comfort. Indeed, hub motors, batteries and the entire drivetrain system produce dynamic excitations which passive suspension cannot handle effectively. This paper presents a comparison of conventional magnetorheological (MR) fluid and the polymer-based MR nanocomposite fluid within the context of semi-active suspension application for electric bicycles. The new composition is based on the use of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) as a polymer additive along with magnetite Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles, providing enhanced dispersion stability, increased yield stress and predictable behaviour under repeated stress loading. A MATLAB simulation was performed using a 2-DOF quarter-car model including motor excitation in the form of sinusoidal waves and composite road disturbance. The simulation showed that the use of polymer MR nanocomposite leads to an 16.7% decrease in the peak sprung mass displacement, improved settling time and better vibration suppression. Mechanism-wise, it is explained by optimizing particle-polymer interactions within the scope of the magnetite nanoparticles’ surface, reducing the possibility of sedimentation and maintaining uniform field-driven damping forces.

Keywords: Polymer-Enhanced MR Fluid, Fe₃O₄ Nanoparticles, Hybrid Composite, Thermal Analysis, Plasticizers.

How to cite this article:
Rutvik R. Pawar, Aditya S. Kale, Pradyumna K. Kulkarni, Maya M Charde, Vishal A. Bhosale, Amol J. Asalekar. Comparative Analysis of Polymer-Enhanced and Conventional Magnetorheological Fluids in E-Bicycle Semi-Active Suspension. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(03):-.
How to cite this URL:
Rutvik R. Pawar, Aditya S. Kale, Pradyumna K. Kulkarni, Maya M Charde, Vishal A. Bhosale, Amol J. Asalekar. Comparative Analysis of Polymer-Enhanced and Conventional Magnetorheological Fluids in E-Bicycle Semi-Active Suspension. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(03):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2026/view=249297


References

[1] J. D. Carlson and M. R. Jolly, “MR fluid, foam and elastomer devices,” Mechatronics, vol. 10, no. 4–5, pp. 555–569, 2000.

[2] B. F. Spencer Jr., S. J. Dyke, M. K. Sain, and J. D. Carlson, “Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 230–238, 1997.

[3] G. Bossis, O. Volkova, S. Lacis, and A. Meunier, “Magnetorheological fluids,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 252, pp. 224–228, 2002.

[4] N. M. Wereley, Magnetorheology: Advances and Applications. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013.

[5] W. Kordonsky, “Magnetorheological effect,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 122, pp. 395–398, 1993.

[6] M. Ashtiani, S. H. Hashemabadi, and A. Ghaffari, “A review on magnetorheological fluid preparation and stabilization,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 374, pp. 716–730, 2015.

[7] Q. H. Nguyen and S. B. Choi, “Optimal design of MR damper,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 18, no. 1, 2009.

[8] I. Arief and A. Mukhopadhyay, “Nanoparticle additives in MR fluids,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 24, no. 6, 2015.

[9] S. J. Dyke, B. F. Spencer Jr., M. K. Sain, and J. D. Carlson, “Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 565–575, 1996.

[10] H. Du, N. Zhang, and J. Lam, “Semi-active vibration control using MR damper,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 329, no. 5, pp. 527–540, 2010.

[11] G. Yang, B. F. Spencer Jr., H. J. Jung, and J. D. Carlson, “Dynamic modeling of MR damper systems,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 130, no. 9, pp. 1107–1114, 2004.

[12] C. Rossi, A. Spaggiari, and F. Dragoni, “Modeling MR dampers,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 105, pp. 1–16, 2018.

[13] X. Zhu, N. Zhang, and H. Du, “Analysis of MR damper,” Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1507–1520, 2012.

[14] M. T. López-López, P. Kuzhir, and G. Bossis, “Magnetorheology of fiber suspensions,” Journal of Rheology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 607–626, 2011.

[15] H. F. Lam and W. H. Liao, “Semi-active suspension using MR dampers,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 329, no. 4, pp. 474–493, 2010.

[16] J. de Vicente, D. J. Klingenberg, and R. Hidalgo-Alvarez, “Magnetorheological fluids: a review,” Soft Matter, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 3701–3710, 2011.

[17] F. F. Fang, Y. D. Liu, and H. J. Choi, “Core-shell structured carbonyl iron/poly(methyl methacrylate) composite particles and their magnetorheological response,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 3487–3495, 2011.

[18] W. Jiang, F. Ye, Q. He, X. Gong, J. Feng, L. Lu, and S. Xuan, “Study of particle structure dependent rheological behavior and magnetorheological effect of polymer coated carbonyl iron particles,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1236–1243, 2014.

[19] B. D. Chin, J. H. Park, M. H. Kwon, and O. O. Park, “Rheological properties and dispersion stability of magnetorheological (MR) suspensions,” Rheologica Acta, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 211–219, 2001.

[20] P. J. Rankin, A. T. Horvath, and D. J. Klingenberg, “Magnetorheology in viscoplastic media,” Rheologica Acta, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 471–477, 1999.

[21] B. J. Park, F. F. Fang, and H. J. Choi, “Magnetorheology: materials and application,” Soft Matter, vol. 6, no. 21, pp. 5246–5253, 2010.

[22] G. T. Ngatu and N. M. Wereley, “Viscometric and sedimentation characterization of bidisperse magnetorheological fluids,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 2474–2476, 2007.

[23]          Ayrilmis N, Kanat G, Ashori A, et al. Utilizing waste manhole covers and fibreboard as reinforcing fillers for thermoplastic composites. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2024;44(17–18). doi:10.1177/07316844241238507.

[24] Asalekar AJ, Sastry DVAR. Enhancing high-speed CNC milling performance of I6Al4V alloy through the application of ZrO-Ag hybrid nanofluids. Eng Res Express. 2024;6(2):025532. doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ad476d.

[25] Manickaraj K, Thirumalaisamy R, Palanisamy S, Ayrilmis N, Massoud EES, Palaniappan M, et al. Value-added utilization of agricultural wastes in biocomposite production: Characteristics and applications. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025;1549:72–91. doi:10.1111/nyas.15368.

[26] Asalekar AJ, Sastry DVAR, Reddy MBS. Analysis of thermophysical properties of novel hybrid nanoparticles-based vegetable nanofluid. Therm Sci. 2023;9(6):1466–1477. doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ad476d.

[27] Ramasubbu R, Kayambu A, Palanisamy S, Ayrilmis N. Mechanical properties of epoxy composites reinforced with Areca catechu fibers containing silicon carbide. BioResources. 2024;19(2):2353–2370. doi:10.15376/biores.19.2.2353-2370.

[28] Asalekar AJ, Sastry DVAR. Comparative analysis of thermal conductivity of the hybrid nanoparticles-based sunflower and jatropha vegetable oil. J Phys Conf Ser. 2023;2810:164–171. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2810/2/131698.

[29] Palanisamy S, Mayandi K, Dharmalingam S, Rajini N, Santulli C, Mohammad F, et al. Tensile properties and fracture morphology of Acacia caesia bark fibers treated with different alkali concentrations. J Nat Fibers. 2022;19(15):11258–11269. doi:10.1080/15440478.2021.2022562.

[30] Mylsamy B, Aruchamy K, Shanmugam SKM, Palanisamy S, Ayrilmis N, et al. Improving performance of composites: Natural and synthetic fibre hybridisation techniques in composite materials – A review. Mater Chem Phys. 2025;334:130439. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.130439.

[31] Asalekar AJ, Sastry DVAR. Prediction and comparative analysis of thermal conductivity of jatropha oil-based hybrid nanofluid by multivariable regression and ANN. J Phys Conf Ser. 2023;2810:32–39. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2810/2/126247.

[32] Manickaraj K, Karthik A, Palanisamy S, Jayamani M, Ali SK, Lakshmi Sankar S, et al. Improving mechanical performance of hybrid polymer composites: Incorporating banana stem leaf and jute fibers with tamarind shell powder. BioResources. 2025;20(1):1998–2025.

Ahead of Print Subscription Original Research
Volume 14
03
Received 29/04/2026
Accepted 27/05/2026
Published 07/07/2026
Publication Time 69 Days
1

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics