This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.
Manas Kumar Yogi,
Darapu Uma,
Yamuna Mundru,
Manam Siva Sai,
- Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pragati Engineering College (Autonomous), Surampalem, Andhra Pradesh, India
- Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pragati Engineering College (Autonomous), Surampalem, Andhra Pradesh, India
- Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pragati Engineering College (Autonomous), Surampalem, Andhra Pradesh, India
- Postgraduate Student, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pragati Engineering College (Autonomous), Surampalem, Andhra Pradesh, India
Abstract
The accelerating global demand for high-performance energy storage systems has stimulated significant research into advanced polymer composites as next-generation electrolytes, electrode binders, and functional membranes for batteries, supercapacitors, and photovoltaic devices. However, the vast compositional and structural design space of polymer materials presents formidable challenges for conventional trial-and-error discovery strategies, which remain slow, costly, and biased by prior expert knowledge. Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have emerged as transformative tools for navigating this complexity, enabling rapid prediction of electrochemical properties, de novo design of polymer electrolytes, and precise optimization of nanostructures for supercapacitors and batteries. This review systematically examines the application of ML techniques, including graph neural networks, Bayesian optimization, variational autoencoders, and transformer-based language models, for the discovery of energy storage polymer composites. The discussion critically evaluates ML-driven advancements across lithium-ion batteries, flexible energy storage devices, and solar energy materials, drawing on quantitative performance benchmarks reported in the primary literature. Emerging strategies such as active learning, multi-fidelity data fusion, physics-informed neural networks, and polymer-specific foundation models are discussed alongside persistent challenges related to data scarcity, model interpretability, and the translation gap between computational prediction and experimental synthesis. The review further addresses the landscape of open polymer property databases, the role of autonomous closed-loop experimentation in accelerating materials discovery, and the importance of reproducible, well-documented machine learning pipelines for the field to mature beyond proof-of-concept demonstrations. By consolidating evidence from verified primary sources and presenting original comparative analyses across methods and application domains, this review provides researchers, materials scientists, and computational chemists with an actionable, evidence-based perspective on the current state and future trajectory of AI-accelerated, sustainable energy storage polymer composite discovery.
Keywords: Machine Learning; Polymer Composites; Energy Storage; Lithium-Ion Batteries; Graph Neural Networks; Electrochemical Property Prediction; Polymer Electrolytes; Supercapacitors; Physics-Informed Neural Networks; Active Learning
Manas Kumar Yogi, Darapu Uma, Yamuna Mundru, Manam Siva Sai. AI-Based Discovery of High-Performance Energy Storage Polymer Composites: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(03):-.
Manas Kumar Yogi, Darapu Uma, Yamuna Mundru, Manam Siva Sai. AI-Based Discovery of High-Performance Energy Storage Polymer Composites: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(03):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2026/view=248809
References
[1] Ramprasad R, Batra R, Pilania G, Mannodi-Kanakkithodi A, Kim C. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. npj Comput Mater. 2017;3:54.
[2] Audus DJ, de Pablo JJ. Polymer informatics: opportunities and challenges. ACS Macro Lett. 2017;6(10):1078-1082.
[3] Jain A, Ong SP, Hautier G, Chen W, Richards WD, Dacek S, et al. Commentary: the Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 2013;1(1):011002.
[4] Chen C, Ye W, Zuo Y, Zheng C, Ong SP. Graph networks as a universal machine learning framework for molecules and crystals. Chem Mater. 2019;31(9):3564-3572.
[5] Gomez-Bombarelli R, Wei JN, Duvenaud D, Hernandez-Lobato JM, Sanchez-Lengeling B, Sheberla D, et al. Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules. ACS Cent Sci. 2018;4(2):268-276.
[6] Lookman T, Balachandran PV, Xue D, Yuan R. Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design. npj Comput Mater. 2019;5:21.
[7] Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys. 2019;378:686-707.
[8] Zhao Q, Stalin S, Zhao CZ, Archer LA. Designing solid-state electrolytes for safe, energy-dense batteries. Nat Rev Mater. 2020;5(3):229-252.
[9] Xu C, Wang Y, Barati Farimani A. TransPolymer: a Transformer-based language model for polymer property predictions. npj Comput Mater. 2023;9:64.
[10] Kuenneth C, Ramprasad R. polyBERT: a chemical language model to enable fully machine-driven ultrafast polymer informatics. Nat Commun. 2023;14:4099.
[11] Dave A, Mitchell J, Kandasamy K, Wang H, Burke S, Paria B, et al. Autonomous optimization of non-aqueous Li-ion battery electrolytes via robotic experimentation and machine learning coupling. Nat Commun. 2022;13:5454.
[12] Lopez CA, Mackanic DG, Cui Y, Bao Z. Designing polymers for advanced battery chemistries. Nat Rev Mater. 2019;4(5):312-330.
[13] Tran HD, Kim C, Chen L, Chandrasekaran A, Batra R, Venkatram S, et al. Machine-learning predictions of polymer properties with Polymer Genome. J Appl Phys. 2020;128(17):171104.
[14] Cencer MM, Moore JS, Assary RS. Machine learning for polymeric materials: an introduction. Polym Int. 2022;71(5):537-542.
[15] Hatakeyama-Sato K. Recent advances and challenges in experiment-oriented polymer informatics. Polym J. 2023;55:117-131.
- Ayrilmis, N., Kanat, G., Yildiz Avsar, E., Palanisamy, S. and Ashori, A., 2025. Utilizing waste manhole covers and fibreboard as reinforcing fillers for thermoplastic composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 44(17-18), pp.1108-1118.
- Almeshaal, M., Palanisamy, S., Murugesan, T.M., Palaniappan, M. and Santulli, C., 2022. Physico-chemical characterization of Grewia Monticola Sond (GMS) fibers for prospective application in biocomposites. Journal of Natural Fibers, 19(17), pp.15276-15290.
- Palanisamy, S., Mayandi, K., Palaniappan, M., Alavudeen, A., Rajini, N., Vannucchi de Camargo, F. and Santulli, C., 2021. Mechanical properties of Phormium tenax reinforced natural rubber composites. Fibers, 9(2), p.11.
- Ramasubbu, R., Kayambu, A., Palanisamy, S. and Ayrilmis, N., 2024. Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Composites Reinforced with Areca catechu Fibers Containing Silicon Carbide. BioResources, 19(2).
- Palanisamy, S., Mayandi, K., Dharmalingam, S., Rajini, N., Santulli, C., Mohammad, F. and Al-Lohedan, H.A., 2022. Tensile properties and fracture morphology of Acacia caesia bark fibers treated with different alkali concentrations. Journal of Natural Fibers, 19(15), pp.11258-11269.

Journal of Polymer & Composites
| Volume | 14 |
| 03 | |
| Received | 18/06/2026 |
| Accepted | 30/06/2026 |
| Published | 03/07/2026 |
| Publication Time | 15 Days |
Login
PlumX Metrics