A Comprehensive Study of Natural Language Processing Systems Using Modern Programming Languages: Techniques, Architectures, Experimental Evaluation and Applications

Year : 2026 | Volume : 13 | Issue : 01 | Page : 12 23
By

Sangeeta Singh,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science Engineering, Madhav University, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

Natural language processing is a key field of study within artificial intelligence that focuses on enabling machines to understand and work with human language. This is because there is much digital text data everywhere. Natural Language Processing is what this study is about. It looks at new ways of doing Natural Language Processing. The old ways are like machine learning, and the new ways are like learning. This study compares how well different models work. Natural Language Processing is an important area of artificial intelligence that aims to help computers interpret, analyze, and interact with human language effectively. The study uses known datasets like internet movie database (IMBD) reviews and Twitter sentiment data to see how well these models work. First, the data has to be prepared. Then the important features have to be found. After that, the model has to be trained. Finally, the model has to be tested to see how well it works. The study uses measures like accuracy and precision to see how well the models work. The findings indicate that the proposed models outperform the previous ones, mainly because they are more effective at capturing the context and underlying meaning within the text. The old models are simple and work fast. They cannot handle complex text. To make these models work, Object-Oriented Programming is very important. It helps to organize the system in a simple way. The code is organized using classes and objects as its fundamental building blocks. This makes it easy to manage parts of the system, like data and models. This way of doing things makes the code easy to read and use again. It also makes it easy to add things to the system. The study also talks about the challenges of Natural Language Processing. These challenges are things like needing a lot of computer power and needing a lot of data. With these challenges, Natural Language Processing is still a very powerful tool. It can be used in areas like healthcare and education. This study helps us understand how to use Natural Language Processing models and how to make them better in the future. Natural Language Processing is still. It will be used in many new ways.

Keywords: Natural language processing (NLP), Object-oriented programming (OOP), ML/DL algorithm, transformers, bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), text mining, artificial intelligence

[This article belongs to Recent Trends in Programming languages ]

How to cite this article: Sangeeta Singh. A Comprehensive Study of Natural Language Processing Systems Using Modern Programming Languages: Techniques, Architectures, Experimental Evaluation and Applications. Recent Trends in Programming languages. 2026; 13(01):12-23.
How to cite this URL: Sangeeta Singh. A Comprehensive Study of Natural Language Processing Systems Using Modern Programming Languages: Techniques, Architectures, Experimental Evaluation and Applications. Recent Trends in Programming languages. 2026; 13(01):12-23. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rtpl/article=2026/view=242325

References

  1. Bird S, Klein E, Loper E. Natural Language Processing with Python: Analyzing Text with the Natural Language Toolkit. Sebastopol (CA): O’Reilly Media Inc.; 2009.
  2. Brown TB, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan J, Dhariwal P, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2020); 2020; Vancouver, BC, Canada. Red Hook (NY): Curran Associates Inc.; 2020.
  3. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20(3):273–297. doi:10.1007/BF00994018.
  4. Devlin J, Chang MW, Lee K, Toutanova K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Burstein J, Doran C, Solorio T, editors. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers); 2019 Jun; Minneapolis, MN, USA. Stroudsburg (PA): Association for Computational Linguistics; 2019. p. 4171–4186. doi:10.18653/v1/N19-1423.
  5. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 1997;9(8):1735–1780. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735. PMID: 9377276.
  6. Elliott R, Glauert JRW, Kennaway JR, Marshall I. The development of language processing support for the ViSiCAST project. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Assets ’00); 2000; Arlington, VA, USA. New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery; 2000. p. 101–108. doi:10.1145/354324.354349.
  7. Maas AL, Daly RE, Pham PT, Huang D, Ng AY, Potts C. Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. In: Lin D, Matsumoto Y, Mihalcea R, editors. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies; 2011 Jun; Portland, OR, USA. Stroudsburg (PA): Association for Computational Linguistics; 2011. p. 142–150.
  8. Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space [preprint]. 2013. arXiv:1301.3781. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1301.3781.
  9. Pennington J, Socher R, Manning CD. GloVe: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP); 2014. p. 1532–1543. doi:10.3115/v1/D14-1162.
  10. Salton G, Buckley C. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf Process Manag. 1988;24(5):513–523. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0.
  11. Sebastiani F. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput Surv. 2002;34(1):1–47. doi:10.1145/505282.505283.
  12. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, et al. Attention is all you need. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2017;30.
  13. Young T, Hazarika D, Poria S, Cambria E. Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing. IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 2018;13(3):55–75. doi:10.1109/MCI.2018.2840738.
  14. Zhang Y, Liu C, Liu M, Liu T, Lin H, Huang CB, et al. Attention is all you need: utilizing attention in AI-enabled drug discovery. Brief Bioinform. 2024;25(1):bbad467. doi:10.1093/bib/bbad467. PMID: 38189543.
  15. Hirschberg J, Manning CD. Advances in natural language processing. Science. 2015;349(6245):261–266. doi:10.1126/science.aaa8685. PubMed PMID: 26185244.
  16. De Bot K. Introduction: second language development as a dynamic process. Mod Lang J. 2008;92(2):166–178. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00712.x.
  17. Liu Y, Zhang M. Neural network methods for natural language processing. Comput Linguist. 2018;44(1):193–195. doi:10.1162/COLI_r_00312.
  18. Nelson K. Individual differences in language development: implications for development and language. Dev Psychol. 1981;17(2):170–187. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.17.2.170.
  19. Liu Y, Ott M, Goyal N, Du J, Joshi M, Chen D, et al. RoBERTa: a robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach [preprint]. 2019. arXiv:1907.11692. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1907.11692.
  20. Wang A, Singh A, Michael J, Hill F, Levy O, Bowman SR. GLUE: a multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. In: Linzen T, Chrupała G, Alishahi A, editors. Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP; 2018 Nov; Brussels, Belgium. Stroudsburg (PA): Association for Computational Linguistics; 2018. p. 353–355. doi:10.18653/v1/W18-5446.
  21. Pascalis O, Loevenbruck H, Quinn PC, Kandel S, Tanaka JW, Lee K. On the links among face processing, language processing, and narrowing during development. Child Dev Perspect. 2014;8(2):65–70. doi:10.1111/cdep.12064. PubMed PMID: 25254069.
  22. Young T, Hazarika D, Poria S, Cambria E. Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing. IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 2018;13(3):55–75. doi:10.1109/MCI.2018.2840738.
  23. Howard J, Ruder S. Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics; 2018. p. 328–339. doi:10.18653/v1/P18-1031.
  24. Sarzynska-Wawer J, Wawer A, Pawlak A, Szymanowska J, Stefaniak I, Jarkiewicz M, et al. Detecting formal thought disorder by deep contextualized word representations. Psychiatry Res. 2021;304:114135. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114135. PMID: 34343877.
  25. Wang Y, Tian F. Recurrent residual learning for sequence classification. In: Su J, Duh K, Carreras X, editors. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP); 2016 Nov; Austin, TX, USA. Stroudsburg (PA): Association for Computational Linguistics; 2016. p. 938–943. doi:10.18653/v1/D16-1093.
  26. Carneiro HCC, França FMG, Lima PMV. Multilingual part-of-speech tagging with weightless neural networks. Neural Netw. 2015;66:11–21. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2015.02.012. PMID: 25795509.
  27. Kim Y. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In: Moschitti A, Pang B, Daelemans W, editors. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP); 2014 Oct; Doha, Qatar. Stroudsburg (PA): Association for Computational Linguistics; 2014. p. 1746–1751. doi:10.3115/v1/D14-1181.
  28. Zhang X, Zhao J, LeCun Y. Character-level convolutional networks for text classification [preprint]. 2015. arXiv:1509.01626. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1509.01626.
  29. Socher R, Perelygin A, Wu J, Chuang J, Manning CD, Ng A, et al. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In: Yarowsky D, Baldwin T, Korhonen A, Livescu K, Bethard S, editors. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP); 2013 Oct; Seattle, WA, USA. Stroudsburg (PA): Association for Computational Linguistics; 2013. p. 1631–1642. doi:10.18653/v1/D13-1170.
  30. Bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate [preprint]. 2014. arXiv:1409.0473. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1409.0473.
  31. Cho K, van Merriënboer B, Gulcehre C, Bahdanau D, Bougares F, Schwenk H, et al. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder–decoder for statistical machine translation. In: Moschitti A, Pang B, Daelemans W, editors. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP); 2014 Oct; Doha, Qatar. Stroudsburg (PA): Association for Computational Linguistics; 2014. p. 1724–1734. doi:10.3115/v1/D14-1179.
  32. Gehring J, Auli M, Grangier D, Yarats D, Dauphin YN. Convolutional sequence to sequence learning [preprint]. 2017. arXiv:1705.03122. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1705.03122.
  33. Raffel C, Shazeer N, Roberts A, Lee K, Narang S, Matena M, et al. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J Mach Learn Res. 2020;21(140):1–67.
  34. Lan Z, Chen M, Goodman S, Gimpel K, Sharma P, Soricut R. ALBERT: a lite BERT for self-supervised learning of language representations [preprint]. 2019. arXiv:1909.11942. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1909.11942.
  35. Clark K, Khandelwal U, Levy O, Manning CD. What does BERT look at? An analysis of BERT’s attention. In: Linzen T, Chrupała G, Belinkov Y, Hupkes D, editors. Proceedings of the 2019 ACL Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP; 2019 Aug; Florence, Italy. Stroudsburg (PA): Association for Computational Linguistics; 2019. p. 276–286. doi:10.18653/v1/W19-4828.
  36. Sun C, Qiu X, Xu Y, Huang X. How to fine-tune BERT for text classification? [preprint]. 2019. arXiv:1905.05583. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1905.05583.
  37. Beltagy I, Peters ME, Cohan A. Longformer: the long-document transformer [preprint]. 2020. arXiv:2004.05150. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2004.05150.
Regular Issue Subscription Review Article
Volume 13
Issue 01
Received 31/03/2026
Accepted 21/04/2026
Published 30/04/2026
Publication Time 30 Days

Login

My IP

PlumX Metrics