Prediction of Depth-Induced Stress Distribution and Maintenance Cost Implications for Submerged Structural Components

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume : 03 | 02 | Page :
    By

    Ekperi Nelson Ibezim,

  • Akpuh Davidson,

  1. Researcher, Chemical/Petrochemical Engineering Department, Rivers state University, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  2. Lecturer, Mechanical Engineering Department, Federal Polytechnic of Oil and Gas Bonny, Rivers State, Nigeria

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of water depth on stress distribution and structural integrity of submerged mechanical components . Structural models fabricated from mild steel, stainless steel, carbon steel, and copper alloy were examined under hydrostatic loading corresponding to water depths between 30 cm and 150 cm. Results indicate that normal and shear stresses increased proportionally with depth due to intensified hydrostatic pressure. Mild steel exhibited the highest stress concentrations, whereas stainless steel demonstrated superior resistance to deformation. Stress intensification was pronounced around sharp corners, holes, and geometric discontinuities. The study also assessed maintenance and operational cost implications by incorporating analytical expressions for Total Gross Margin (TGM), Scrap Disposal Cost per Incident (SDCPI), and Total Breakdown Maintenance Cost (TBdMc). Findings reveal that deeper installations incur higher structural stress and potentially higher maintenance costs due to increased likelihood of fatigue and localized failure. The research provides guidance for material selection, geometric optimization, and lifecycle cost assessment for underwater mechanical systems such as pipelines, braces, and submerged pressure vessels. Analytical formulations are complemented by numerical simulations to capture nonlinear stress variations and localized stress concentrations under varying hydrostatic pressures. The predicted stress profiles are further linked with degradation and damage accumulation models to estimate inspection frequency, repair requirements, and component service life. Based on these estimates, a maintenance cost assessment model is developed to evaluate the economic implications of operating at greater depths. Results indicate that increasing depth significantly amplifies stress gradients, leading to higher fatigue and corrosion risks, which in turn escalate maintenance frequency and lifecycle costs. The study highlights the importance of depth-aware design and predictive maintenance strategies in optimizing both structural reliability and long-term operational costs of submerged systems.

Keywords: water depth, stress distribution, finite element modeling, hydrostatic loading, submerged structures, maintenance cost modeling

How to cite this article:
Ekperi Nelson Ibezim, Akpuh Davidson. Prediction of Depth-Induced Stress Distribution and Maintenance Cost Implications for Submerged Structural Components. International Journal of Fracture Mechanics and Damage Science. 2025; 03(02):-.
How to cite this URL:
Ekperi Nelson Ibezim, Akpuh Davidson. Prediction of Depth-Induced Stress Distribution and Maintenance Cost Implications for Submerged Structural Components. International Journal of Fracture Mechanics and Damage Science. 2025; 03(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijfmds/article=2025/view=235287


References

  1. Adebayo, O. A., & Fashanu, T. A. (2024). Hydrostatic pressure effects on submerged steel structures. Journal of Marine Engineering Research, 18(2), 55–67.
  2. Chen, L., & Kumar, R. (2025). Finite element modeling of underwater mechanical joints. Engineering Structures, 310, 117512.
  3. Duran, M., & Ortega, P. (2024). Stress concentration behavior in metallic components under fluid load. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 250, 108345.
  4. Ezugwu, C. I., & Ogunlade, S. (2025). Structural fatigue of offshore components exposed to variable water depth. Ocean Engineering, 295, 113725.
  5. Gupta, H., & Singh, A. (2024). Hydrostatic loading and material response in submerged systems. Applied Ocean Research, 142, 103215.
  6. Hassan, M. T., & Adekunle, J. (2025). Mechanical reliability analysis of marine pipelines. Marine Structures, 93, 102181.
  7. Jimenez, P., & Torres, R. (2024). Influence of geometry on stress risers in submerged metal plates. Structural Integrity Journal, 40(3), 201–214.
  8. Lin, Y., & Zhao, B. (2025). FEA simulation of depth-dependent stress variations. Finite Element Analysis Review, 12(1), 45–59.
  9. Mohammed, S., & Ibrahim, Y. (2024). Corrosion and stress-related failures in mild steel underwater installations. Materials Performance and Characterization, 13(4), 500–516.
  10. Patel, R., & Wang, T. (2024). Hydrodynamic loading on submerged structures: A computational approach. Journal of Fluid–Structure Interaction, 6(1), 33–48.
  11. Udo, K. E., & Chukwu, L. (2025). Maintenance cost modeling for generator and mechanical systems. Industrial Engineering Letters, 10(2), 77–89.
  12. Zhang, Q., & Luo, J. (2024). Comparative analysis of material strength in underwater environments. Materials & Design, 245, 112987.
  13. Onwuka, E. (1999). The Marketing of Petroleum Products in Nigeria: A case study of Pipeline and Product Marketing Company (PPMC), an unpublished MBA Degree Dissertation, Rivers State University of Science and Technology, Port Harcourt.
  14. Papadakis, G.A. (1999). Major Hazard Pipelines: A Comparative Study of Onshore Transmission Accidents, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 12(1),91-107.
Ahead of Print Subscription Original Research
Volume 03
02
Received 10/12/2025
Accepted 18/12/2025
Published 29/12/2025
Publication Time 19 Days
67

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics