Pankaj Kumar,
- Independent Researcher, Nayak Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract
Time is the scale for the measurement of the various activities happening in the whole universe. Therefore, it also can be commented that, “Time is the scale for the measurement of the rate of the change of the energy from one form to another into its various states. That means the range of the various states of the energy starts from string and waves and reaches up to quantum particles, subatomic particles, atomic particles, molecular and compound particles, common physical objects, gigantic objects, super massive objects etc. Likewise, finally it can be expressed that, Time is directly proportional to the rate of the change of the various states of the energy and matter into their various positions. accordingly, it may finally be expressed that time is directly proportional to the rate at which these various states of energy and matter undergo transformation, rearrangement, relocation, and dynamic evolution within the universe. This reflects the principle that the more rapidly energy and matter shift between states, the more prominently time becomes expressed or perceptible. In essence, time emerges as a natural consequence of continuous change, acting as the underlying dimension that records, regulates, and relates all transitions in the cosmos. Thus, time can be viewed as an intrinsic measure of cosmic evolution, governing every interaction—from the smallest quantum fluctuations to the largest astronomical processes. It not only tracks change but also connects the physical phenomena across all scales, emphasizing that without change in energy or matter, the very perception of time would cease to exist
Keywords: Scale, energy waves, energy states, cosmic evolution, cosmos
[This article belongs to International Journal of Universe ]
Pankaj Kumar. Energy Time Scale Theory. International Journal of Universe. 2025; 01(02):01-07.
Pankaj Kumar. Energy Time Scale Theory. International Journal of Universe. 2025; 01(02):01-07. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/iju/article=2025/view=233699
References
- Simmonds A. A study of the legal implications of time dilation in accordance with Einstein’s theory of special relativity. Cambridge L. Rev. 2024;9:1.
- Madarász JX, Németi I, Székely G. Twin paradox and the logical foundation of relativity theory. Foundations of Physics. 2006 May;36(5):681–714.
- Aerts D. Quantum particles as conceptual entities: A possible explanatory framework for quantum theory. Foundations of Science. 2009 Nov;14(4):361–411.
- Islam MR, Islam JS, Zatzman GM, Rahman MS, Khan MM. God, God’s Particle, God’s Wrath and Force of Nature: Delinearized History of Mass, Energy and Time. Advances in Sustainable Petroleum Engineering Science. 2014 Oct 1;6(4):401.
- Landsman K. Foundations of General Relativity: From Einstein to Black Holes. Radboud University Press; 2021.
- Hill CA. Why (and How) to Give Uncertainty its Due. Critical Review. 2025 May 30:1–4.
- Bakholdin IB. Three-wave resonance and averaged equations of the interaction of two waves in media described by a cubic Schrödinger equation. Fluid dynamics. 1992 Jan;27(1):81–7.
- Monroe C, Meekhof DM, King BE, Wineland DJ. A “Schrödinger cat” superposition state of an atom. science. 1996 May 24;272(5265):1131–6.
- Nimmrichter S, Hornberger K. Macroscopicity of mechanical quantum superposition states. Physical review letters. 2013 Apr 19;110(16):160403.
- Lehner C. What it feels like to be in a superposition. And why. Synthese. 1997 Feb;110(2):191–216.
| Volume | 01 |
| Issue | 02 |
| Received | 15/11/2025 |
| Accepted | 29/11/2025 |
| Published | 10/12/2025 |
| Publication Time | 25 Days |
Login
PlumX Metrics