Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Hollow Bricks Incorporating Aerated Aggregates: A Polymer-Cement Composite Approach

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume : 13 | 05 | Page :
    By

    Km. Antima,

  • Karan Babbar,

  1. M. Tech Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Quantum University, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Quantum University, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

Abstract

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_202182’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

The rapid advancement of construction technologies has necessitated the development of lightweight, thermally efficient, and sustainable building materials. Hollow bricks, due to their inherent voids, offer substantial reductions in dead load and enhanced insulation properties. However, their mechanical performance often falls short when compared to conventional solid bricks. To address this limitation, this study explores the synergistic integration of aerated aggregates and polymer-cement composites (PCCs) in hollow brick production. Aerated aggregates such as foamed glass and expanded clay provide the benefits of low density and thermal insulation but typically compromise compressive strength. Meanwhile, polymer additives like Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SBR), Acrylic Emulsions, and Epoxy Resins significantly improve the bond strength, flexibility, water resistance, and crack-bridging ability of cementitious composites. This research combines these materials to produce innovative hollow bricks with improved structural and durability characteristics. Five distinct mix designs incorporating varying proportions of polymers and aerated aggregates were tested. Comprehensive laboratory evaluations included compressive strength, flexural strength, water absorption, impact resistance, thermal conductivity, and microstructural analysis using SEM and DSC/TGA techniques. The findings revealed that the optimal combination (Mix M3: 90% cement, 10% epoxy, and 20% aerated aggregates) exhibited a 26% increase in compressive strength and nearly 40% reduction in water absorption compared to the control sample. Flexural strength and impact resistance were also significantly enhanced due to polymer bridging and improved aggregate-matrix bonding. Furthermore, thermal analysis confirmed the improved insulation and thermal stability of the polymer-modified bricks. SEM images showcased a more homogeneous and denser microstructure with fewer voids and microcracks. The study concludes that polymer-modified, aerated-aggregate hollow bricks present a viable and sustainable alternative for modern masonry construction, especially in low- to mid-rise buildings. They offer a balanced performance in terms of strength, weight, durability, and energy efficiency, making them suitable for the future of eco-friendly and structurally sound architecture.

Keywords: Hollow bricks, aerated aggregates, polymer-cement composites, lightweight masonry, mechanical properties, thermal performance, acrylic emulsion, SBR latex, epoxy resin, microstructure.

How to cite this article:
Km. Antima, Karan Babbar. Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Hollow Bricks Incorporating Aerated Aggregates: A Polymer-Cement Composite Approach. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(05):-.
How to cite this URL:
Km. Antima, Karan Babbar. Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Hollow Bricks Incorporating Aerated Aggregates: A Polymer-Cement Composite Approach. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(05):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2025/view=0


document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_202182’);});Edit

References

  1. Bureau of Indian Standards. [1] (Part 1): Hollow Clay Masonry Units – Specification. New Delhi: BIS; 2009.
  2. Bureau of Indian Standards. [2]: Specification for Burnt Clay Building Bricks (Second Revision). New Delhi: BIS; 1988.
  3. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJM. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. 3rd ed.  New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2006.
  4. Das A, Satpathy P, Moharana M. Strength and durability of hollow concrete blocks with recycled aggregates. Constr Build Mater.  2018;161:20–9.
  5. Domone P, Illston JM. Construction Materials: Their Nature and Behaviour. 4th ed.  Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2010.
  6. Chandra S, Berntsson L. Lightweight Aggregate Concrete: Science, Technology, and Applications. Norwich (NY): Noyes Publications; 2003.
  7. Kumar P, Sharma A, Singh S. Bio-derived lightweight fillers in concrete composites: Sustainable applications and durability insights. J Sustain Constr Mater.  2024;15(1):45–56.
  8. Silva DA, Toledo Filho RD. Polymer modified mortar: Review on recent advances. J Mater Civ Eng.  2012;24(5):568–76.
  9. Roy S, Dey T, Ghosh S. Effect of polymer additives on lightweight aggregate concrete. Mater Today Proc.  2020;28:1200–6.
  10. Zhang X, Wang Y, Li Q. Mechanical behavior of polymer-modified lightweight concrete under flexural load. J Build Eng.  2019;26:100867.
  11. Ghorbani R, Zhang L, Chen Y. Advanced polymer-modified bricks for sustainable construction: Mechanical and thermal perspectives. Mater Des.  2022;214:110383.
  12. Mohan S, Kumar P, Singh D. Thermal performance of clay bricks using recycled glass aggregate. Energy Build.  2017;150:1–9.
  13. Bureau of Indian Standards. [5]: Specification for 43 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement. New Delhi: BIS; 2013.
  14. Bureau of Indian Standards. [6]: Methods of Tests of Burnt Clay Building Bricks – Determination of Compressive Strength. New Delhi: BIS; 1992.
  15. ASTM International. [19]/C78M-21: Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading). West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2021.
  16. Bureau of Indian Standards. [7]: Methods of Tests of Burnt Clay Building Bricks – Determination of Water Absorption. New Delhi: BIS; 1992.
  17. ASTM International. [18]-19: Standard Test Method for Steady-State Heat Flux Measurements and Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Guarded-Hot-Plate Apparatus. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2019.
  18. Bureau of Indian Standards. [3]: Specification for Coarse and Fine Aggregates for Concrete. New Delhi: BIS; 2016.
  19. Bureau of Indian Standards. [4]: Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice. New Delhi: BIS; 2000.
  20. Al-Oraimi SK, Seibi AC. Mechanical properties of polymer concrete composites using different compositions and tests. Cement Concr Compos. 1995;17(4):295–302.
  21. Mohammadi M, Behfarnia K. The effect of polymer latex and silica fume on properties of repair mortars. Constr Build Mater. 2012;36:571–8.
  22. Neville AM. Properties of Concrete. 5th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2011.
  23. Zhang MH, Gjørv OE. Characteristics of lightweight aggregates for high-strength concrete. Mater Struct. 1991;24:357–65.
  24. Peled A, Bentur A. Influence of polymer modification on the properties of lightweight aggregate cement composites. Cem Concr Compos. 2003;25(5):457–63.
  25. Siddique R, Klaus J. Influence of metakaolin on the properties of mortar and concrete: A review. Appl Clay Sci. 2009;43(3–4):392–400.
  26. Bentur A, Mindess S. Fibre Reinforced Cementitious Composites. 2nd ed. London: CRC Press; 2006.
  27. Chowdhury S, Maniar A, Suganya O. Polyethylene fiber reinforced fly ash concrete. Procedia Eng. 2014;95:505–12.
Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume 13
05
Received 21/06/2025
Accepted 24/07/2025
Published 12/08/2025
Publication Time 52 Days
104

[first_name] [last_name]

My IP

PlumX Metrics