Lifestyle Factors and Perceptions of Diabetes Among Individuals in North India

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume : 02 | 02 | Page :
    By

    Eric Kwasi Elliason,

  1. Research Fellow, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Desh Bhagat University, Punjab- 147301, India

Abstract

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_201866’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

Background: Diabetes mellitus is influenced by a complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. In North India, unique socio-cultural and dietary patterns shape individual behaviors and perceptions toward diabetes. Understanding these lifestyle choices and cultural beliefs is critical for designing interventions that improve adherence to medical treatment and promote healthier outcomes.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,500 individuals diagnosed with diabetes across selected urban and rural districts in North India. A structured and validated questionnaire assessed dietary habits, physical activity, use of alternative medicine, medication adherence, and perceptions about diabetes. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and an online survey. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and significance testing (p < 0.05) were used to analyze the data.

Results: The majority of participants (59.3%) reported high-carbohydrate intake, and only 48% engaged in regular physical activity (≥3 times per week). While 68.3% adhered regularly to prescribed medication, only 27.3% practiced consistent blood glucose monitoring. Alternative medicine was used by 41% of respondents. Most participants (73.7%) perceived diabetes as manageable, and 64.7% reported that family influenced their dietary decisions. Belief in traditional remedies was more common among rural and older individuals. Poor lifestyle adherence was significantly associated with rural residence, lower education, and lower socio-economic status (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Diabetes self-management in North India is challenged by high-carbohydrate diets, irregular physical activity, and widespread belief in alternative remedies. Cultural perceptions, family influence, and socio-demographic factors significantly shape health behaviors. Targeted education, culturally sensitive interventions, and community engagement are essential to improve lifestyle practices and perceptions of diabetes management in this region.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus, lifestyle behaviors, alternative medicine, physical activity, dietary habits, cultural perception, North India, self-management

How to cite this article:
Eric Kwasi Elliason. Lifestyle Factors and Perceptions of Diabetes Among Individuals in North India. International Journal of Tropical Medicines. 2025; 02(02):-.
How to cite this URL:
Eric Kwasi Elliason. Lifestyle Factors and Perceptions of Diabetes Among Individuals in North India. International Journal of Tropical Medicines. 2025; 02(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijtm/article=2025/view=0


document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_201866’);});Edit

References

  1. Mohan V, Deepa M, Anjana RM. Diabetes in South Asia: Challenges and solutions. Curr Diab Rep. 2019;19(5):27.
  2. Misra A, Chowbey P, Makkar BM, Vikram NK, Wasir JS, Chadha D, et al. Consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity and metabolic syndrome for Asian Indians and recommendations for physical activity, medical and surgical management. J Assoc Physicians India. 2018;67(2):163–71.
  3. Rao A, Mukherjee D, Ghosh S. The role of traditional medicine in managing chronic diseases in India: Evidence and policy perspectives. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2021;12(3):512–8.
  4. Joshi SR, Saboo B, Kalra S. Managing diabetes in India: Transcending barriers to optimizing glycemic control. J Assoc Physicians India. 2020;68(6):11–5.
  5. Kapoor D, Srivastava R, Singh K. Lifestyle practices and diabetes control in urban India: A cross-sectional analysis. Indian J Public Health. 2021;65(2):115–21.
  6. Setia MS. Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-sectional Studies. Indian J Dermatol. 2016;61(3):261–4.
  7. Misra A, Shrivastava U. Obesity and dyslipidemia in South Asians. Nutr Metab Insights. 2019;12:1–12.
  8. Cochran WG. Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1977.
  9. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 10th ed. Brussels: IDF; 2021.
  10. Basu S, Millett C, Bloom DE. The impact of socioeconomic status on health care access in India. Health Aff. 2019;28(4):114–24.
  11. Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS, Ramasamy J. Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2013;12(1):14.
  12. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2016.
  13. Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health. 2005;27(3):281–91.
  14. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th ed. London: Sage Publications; 2018.
  15. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
  16. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4.
  17. Akhter S, Hasan M, Rahman MM, et al. Herbal remedies in the management of diabetes mellitus: efficacy, interactions, and risks. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017;16(1):44–55.
  18. Anjana RM, Pradeepa R, Deepa M, Datta M, Sudha V, Unnikrishnan R, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes in 15 states of India: Results from the ICMR–INDIAB population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(8):585–96.
  19. Nam S, Kim H, Lee J, et al. Stigma and its effects on emotional distress, treatment adherence, and disease disclosure in chronic illness: A review of the literature. J Health Psychol. 2011;16(6):857–70.

 

Ahead of Print Subscription Original Research
Volume 02
02
Received 02/07/2025
Accepted 22/07/2025
Published 26/07/2025
Publication Time 24 Days
27

[last_name]

My IP

PlumX Metrics