Dental Implant Analysis Using the Wear and Hardness Testing Method

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume : 13 | 05 | Page : –
    By

    Aniket Suresh Paste,

  • Subodh A. Shirsath,

  1. , Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sandip University, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sandip University, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_196596’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

We will compare the number of implants from the manufacturer using either an analytical approach or a software-based approach using Minitab software regarding structural dental implants. Several factors influence a dental implant, and new bone grows. The implant surface is one of the elements that have a major impact on the quality of osteointegration. Various techniques and resources have been employed to modify an implant’s surface to encourage osseointegration along with an increase in success and survival rates. Adding graphene onto an implant’s surface is one such modification. This study summarises data from publications published online over the past ten gives a comprehensive assessment of the effects by adding graphene to dental implants plus discusses the several approaches that involve surface modification. The particular one which results emphasize how crucial it is to select suitable materials that can sustain sustained functional stresses without deteriorating and failing. The design and selection of dental implants are improved by this research, which also improves patient outcomes and the durability of dental restorations. 3D printing, another name for additive manufacturing, has recently attracted attention from all around the world and is growing in importance across several industries. One area of the healthcare industry where 3D printing technology is being used more and more is in the creation and application of dental implants.

Keywords: Types of Dental Implants, DoE, Minitab Software

aWQ6MjE2NzY0fGZpbGVuYW1lOjNmYWQ2Y2Y4LWZpLmF2aWZ8c2l6ZTp0aHVtYm5haWw=
How to cite this article:
Aniket Suresh Paste, Subodh A. Shirsath. Dental Implant Analysis Using the Wear and Hardness Testing Method. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(05):-.
How to cite this URL:
Aniket Suresh Paste, Subodh A. Shirsath. Dental Implant Analysis Using the Wear and Hardness Testing Method. Journal of Polymer and Composites. 2025; 13(05):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2025/view=0


document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_196596’);});Edit

References

  1. Fatma A. N. AbouelMaaty , Mai A. Ragab , Yasmin M. El-Ghazawy , Fatma I. Elfaiedi , Marwa M. S. Abbass , Israa Ahmed Radwan, Dina Rady , Sara El Moshy , NahedSedkyKorany, Geraldine M. Ahmed, Christof E. Dörfer and Karim M. Fawzy El-Sayed a Peri-Implant Soft Tissue in Contact with Zirconium/Titanium Abutments from Histological and Biological Perspectives: A Concise Review,Cells 2025, 14, 129. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/cells14020129.
  2. Liliane Bokobza Review On the Use of Nanoparticles in Dental Implants,Journal of Materials 2024, 17, 3191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17133191
  3. Lotfollah Kamali Hakim, Amir Yari, NarimanNikparto, Saeed HasaniMehraban, Sahar Cheperli, Amirali Asadi, Amir Mohammad ArabiDarehdor, SaynaNezaminia, DoraraDortaj, YasinNazari, Mohamad Dehghan, Pardis Hojjat, Mahsa Mohajeri and Mohammad Saleh HasaniJebelli, Systematic review on the current applications of nano and biomaterials in drug delivery of dental implant in the journal Hakim,BMC Oral Health (2024) 24:126 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-03911-9.
  4. Pereira, T.; Kennedy, J.V.; Potgieter, J. A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 30, 11–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003.
  5. FerreiraTJ, Vieira MT, Costa J, et al. Manufacturing Dental Implants using Powder Injection Molding. J OrthodEndod. 2016, 2:1.
  6. Saha S, Roy S. Metallic Dental Implants Wear Mechanisms, Materials, and Manufacturing Processes: A Literature Review. Materials (Basel). 2022 Dec 24;16(1):161. doi: 10.3390/ma16010161. PMID: 36614500; PMCID: PMC9821388.
  1. Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, Suzuki M, Silva NR, Cardaropoli G, Thompson VP, Lemons JE. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B ApplBiomater. 2009 Feb;88(2):579-96. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31264. PMID: 18973274.
  2. Chen, X., Xie, L., Chen, J. et al. Design and fabrication of custom-made dental implants. J MechSciTechnol 26, 1993–1998 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0501-9
  3. Kamaljit Singh Boparai, Rupinder Singh & M. S. J. Hashmi Reinforced non-conventional material composites: a comprehensive review,Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 7:2, 333-342, DOI: 10.1080/2374068X.2020.1783944
  4. Ghinassi B, Di Baldassarre A, D’Addazio G, Traini T, Andrisani M, Di Vincenzo G, Gaggi G, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Sinjari B. Gingival Response to Dental Implant: Comparison Study on the Effects of New Nanopored Laser-Treated vs. Traditional Healing Abutments. Int J Mol Sci.2020 Aug 22;21(17):6056. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176056. PMID: 32842709; PMCID: PMC7504205.
  5. Donatella Duraccio,FedericoMussano& Maria Giulia Faga, Biomaterials for dental implants: current and future trends, Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 J Mater Sci (2015) 50:4779–4812 DOI 10.1007/s10853-015-9056-3.
  6. Alqutaibi, Ahmed &Alghauli, Mohammed &Aljohani, Marwan & Zafar, Muhammad. (2024), Advanced additive manufacturing in implant dentistry: 3D printing technologies, printable materials, current applications and future requirements. e00356. 10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00356.
  7. Marchio, V.; Cinquini, C.; Alfonsi, F.; Romeggio, S.; Stoppaccioli, M.; Zingari, F.; Priami, M.; Barone, A. Retrospective Analysis of Full-Arch Zirconia Rehabilitations on Dental Implants: Clinical Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction. Sci. 2025, 15, 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010416
  8. Büyük, Fatma&Savran, Efe&Karpat, Fatih. (2022). Review on finite element analysis of dental implants. Journal of Dental Implant Research. 41. 10.54527/jdir.2022.41.3.50.
  9. Menacho-Mendoza E, Cedamanos-Cuenca R, Díaz-Suyo A. Stress analysis and factor of safety in three dental implant systems by finite element analysis. Saudi Dent J. 2022 Nov;34(7):579-584. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Aug 27. PMID: 36267532; PMCID: PMC9577351.
  10. Falcinelli C, Valente F, Vasta M, Traini T. Finite element analysis in implant dentistry: State of the art and future directions. Dent Mater. 2023 Jun;39(6):539-556. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 18. PMID: 37080880.
  11. Jiang X, Yao Y, Tang W, Han D, Zhang L, Zhao K, Wang S, Meng Y. Design of dental implants at materials level: An overview. J Biomed Mater Res 2020 Aug 1;108(8):1634-1661. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36931. Epub 2020 Mar 31. PMID: 32196913.
  12. Paracchini, L.; Barbieri, C.; Redaelli, M.; Di Croce, D.; Vincenzi, C.; Guarnieri, R. Finite Element Analysis of a New Dental Implant Design Optimized for the Desirable Stress Distribution in the Surrounding Bone Region. Prosthesis 2020, 2, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis2030019
  13. Lin, P.-J.; Su, K.-C. Biomechanical Design Application on the Effect of Different Occlusion Conditions on Dental Implants with Different Positions—A Finite Element Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5826. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175826
  14. Waghmare G, Waghmare K, Bagde S, Deshmukh M, N. Kashyap D, Shahu VT. Materials Evolution in Dental Implantology: A Comprehensive Review. Adv. Res. Appl. Mech. [Internet]. 2024 Aug. 30 [cited 2025 Jan. 27];123(1):75-100. Available from: https://semarakilmu.com.my/journals/index.php/appl_mech/article/view/8028
  1. Srivastava R, Bansal R, Dubey PK, Singh D. A comparative evaluation of masticatory load distribution in different types of prosthesis with varying number of implants: A FEM analysis. J Oral BiolCraniofac Res. 2024 May-Jun;14(3):284-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Apr 2. PMID: 38577263; PMCID: PMC10993183.
  2. Garg, A.; Gupta, S.; Tewari, N.; Srivastav, S.; Chanda, A. Effect of Adhesive Materials in Re-Attachment of Crown and Crown–Root Fractures of Permanent Maxillary Anterior Tooth: A Computational Study. Comput. Appl. 2023, 28, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca28020041
  3. K N, Chethan&Namlimhemnatee, Thanachai& N H, Padmaraj& Kumar, Saurabh&Eram, Afiya& Shetty, Nisha&Bamrungwong, Joompon&Keni, Laxmikant. (2024). Optimizing stress distribution in dental air abrasion through design of experiments: a finite element analysis. Cogent Engineering. 10.1080/23311916.2024.2380349.
  4. SINGH, Sarabjit. Surface Modification Analysis of Dental Implant Materials through Taguchi and RSM Approach for: A Review. Journal of Advanced Research in Instrumentation and Control Engineering, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1&2, p. 6-9, june 2023. ISSN 2456-1398.
  5. Bharadwaz, Angshuman&Dhar, Sarit&Jayasuriya, A. (2023). Full factorial design of experiment-based and response surface methodology approach for evaluating variation in uniaxial compressive mechanical properties, and biocompatibility of photocurable PEGDMA-based scaffolds. Biomedical materials (Bristol, England). 10.1088/1748-605X/acb7bd.
  6. Suriyaamporn P, Sahatsapan N, Patrojanasophon P, Opanasopit P, Kumpugdee-Vollrath M, Ngawhirunpat T. Optimization of In Situ Gel-Forming Chlorhexidine-Encapsulated Polymeric Nanoparticles Using Design of Experiment for Periodontitis. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2023 Jul 28;24(6):161. doi: 10.1208/s12249-023-02600-0. PMID: 37505346.
  7. Gaviria L, Salcido JP, Guda T, Ong JL. Current trends in dental implants. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Apr;40(2):50-60. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.50. Epub 2014 Apr 28. PMID: 24868501; PMCID: PMC4028797.
  8. Pérez RA, Gargallo J, Altuna P, Herrero-Climent M, Gil FJ. Fatigue of Narrow Dental Implants: Influence of the Hardening Method. Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 20;13(6):1429. doi: 10.3390/ma13061429. PMID: 32245138; PMCID: PMC7143173.
  9. Alghamdi HS, Jansen JA. The development and future of dental implants. Dent Mater J. 2020 Mar 31;39(2):167-172. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-140. Epub 2020 Jan 22. PMID: 31969548.
  10. Samara W, Moztarzadeh O, Hauer L, Babuska V. Dental Implant Placement in Medically Compromised Patients: A Literature Review. Cureus. 2024 Feb 14;16(2):e54199. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54199. PMID: 38496195; PMCID: PMC10942790.
  11. Vaidya RY, I N A, Balakrishnan D, Nakata H, S K, Krishnamoorthy G. Impact of graphene incorporation in dental implants-A scoping review. 2024 Sep 11;10(18):e37751. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37751. PMID: 39318807; PMCID: PMC11420491.
  12. Arai Y, Takashima M, Matsuzaki N, Takada S. Marginal bone loss in dental implants: A literature review of risk factors and treatment strategies for prevention. J Prosthodont Res. 2025 Jan 10;69(1):12-20. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00223. Epub 2024 Jun 26. PMID: 38925986.
  13. Trombelli L, Farina R, Tomasi C, Vignoletti F, Paolantoni G, Giordano F, et al. Factors Trombelli L, Farina R, Tomasi C, Vignoletti F, Paolantoni G, Giordano F, Ortensi L, Simonelli A. Factors affecting radiographic marginal bone resorption at dental implants in function for at least 5 years: A multicenter retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Nov;35(11):1406-1417. doi: 10.1111/clr.14327. Epub 2024 Jul 15. PMID: 39007340.
  14. Gao, J.; Pan, Y.; Gao, Y.; Pang, H.; Sun, H.; Cheng, L.; Liu, J. Research Progress on the Preparation Process and Material Structure of 3D-Printed Dental Implants and Their Clinical Applications. Coatings 2024, 14, 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14070781
  15. Manfredini M, Poli PP, Giboli L, Beretta M, Maiorana C, Pellegrini M. Clinical Factors on Dental Implant Fractures: A Systematic Review. Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;12(7):200. doi: 10.3390/dj12070200. PMID: 39056987; PMCID: PMC11276356.
  16. Häggman-Henrikson B, Ali D, Aljamal M, Chrcanovic BR. Bruxism and dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Jan;51(1):202-217. doi: 10.1111/joor.13567. Epub 2023 Aug 17. PMID: 37589382.
  17. Bokobza, L. On the Use of Nanoparticles in Dental Implants. Materials2024, 17, 3191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17133191
  18. Kumar R, Gautam RK. Development of Ti-10Nb alloy by powder metallurgy processing route for dental application. J Biomed Mater Res B ApplBiomater. 2024 Jan;112(1):e35338. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35338. Epub 2023 Oct 17. PMID: 37846459.
  19. Marasli, C.; Katifelis, H.; Gazouli, M.; Lagopati, N. Nano-Based Approaches in Surface Modifications of Dental Implants: A Literature Review. Molecules 2024, 29, 3061. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29133061
  20. Qiu P, Cao R, Li Z, Fan Z. A comprehensive biomechanical evaluation of length and diameter of dental implants using finite element analyses: A systematic review. 2024 Feb 22;10(5):e26876. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26876. PMID: 38434362; PMCID: PMC10907775.
  21. Kupka JR, König J, Al-Nawas B, Sagheb K, Schiegnitz E. How far can we go? A 20-year meta-analysis of dental implant survival rates. Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 21;28(10):541. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05929-3. PMID: 39305362; PMCID: PMC11416373.
  22. Breunig N, Stiller M, Mogk M, Mengel R. Influence of gingival phenotype on crestal bone loss at implants : A long-term 2 to 20-year cohort study in periodontally compromised patient. Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Aug 13;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00531-4. PMID: 39136808; PMCID: PMC11322456.
  23. Komatsu, K., Matsuura, T., Cheng, J. et al. Nanofeatured surfaces in dental implants: contemporary insights and impending challenges. Int J Implant Dent 10, 34 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-024-00550-1
  24. Zou X, Zheng X, Liang Y, Zhang C, Fan B, Liang J, Ling J, Bian Z, Yu Q, Hou B, Chen Z, Wei X, Qiu L, Chen W, He W, Xu X, Meng L, Zhang C, Chen L, Deng S, Lei Y, Xie X, Wang X, Yu J, Zhao J, Shen S, Zhou X, Yue L. Expert consensus on irrigation and intracanal medication in root canal therapy. Int J Oral Sci. 2024 Mar 1;16(1):23. doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00280-5. PMID: 38429299; PMCID: PMC10907616.
  25. Nayem Hossain, MdHosneMobarak, Amran Hossain, Fardin Khan, JuhiJannatMim, Mohammad AsaduzzamanChowdhury,Advances of plant and biomass extracted zirconium nanoparticles in dental implant application,Heliyon,Volume 9, Issue 5,2023,e15973,ISSN 2405-8440,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15973..
  26. Gupta Y, Iyer R, Dommeti VK, Nutu E, Rana M, Merdji A, Biswas JK, Roy S. Design of dental implant using design of experiment and topology optimization: A finite element analysis study. ProcInstMechEng H. 2021 Feb;235(2):157-166. doi: 10.1177/0954411920967146. Epub 2020 Oct 23. PMID: 33094686.
  27. Chaurasia A, Namachivayam A, Koca-Ünsal RB, Lee JH. Deep-learning performance in identifying and classifying dental implant systems from dental imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024 Feb;54(1):3-12. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2300160008. Epub 2023 Mar 27. PMID: 37154107; PMCID: PMC10901682.
  1. Tchinda AP, Pierson G, Kouitat-Njiwa R, Bravetti P. The Surface Conditions and Composition of Titanium Alloys in Implantology: A Comparative Study of Dental Implants of Different Brands. Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 28;15(3):1018. doi: 10.3390/ma15031018. PMID: 35160961; PMCID: PMC8840750.
  2. Martinez-Marquez D, Gulati K, Carty CP, Stewart RA, Ivanovski S. Determining the relative importance of titania nanotubes characteristics on bone implant surface performance: A quality by design study with a fuzzy approach. Mater SciEng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020 Sep;114:110995. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110995. Epub 2020 Apr 21. PMID: 32993986.
  3. Pieniak D, Walczak A, Walczak M, Przystupa K, Niewczas AM. Hardness and Wear Resistance of Dental Biomedical Nanomaterials in a Humid Environment with Non-Stationary Temperatures. Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 10;13(5):1255. doi: 10.3390/ma13051255. PMID: 32164254; PMCID: PMC7085084.
  4. Akimasa Tsujimotoa, Wayne W. Barkmeier, Nicholas G. Fischer, Kie Nojiri, Yuko Naguraa , Toshiki Takamizawaa , Mark A. Latta, Masashi Miazaki.Wear of resin composites: Current insights into underlying mechanisms, evaluation methods and influential factorsPublished by Elsevier Ltd.Received 24 May 2017; received in revised form 18 October 2017; accepted 14 November 2017 with https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2017.11.002.
  5. Min-Sang Cha, Sang-Woon Lee, Yoon-Hyuk Huh, Lee-Ra Cho, Chan-Jin ParkCorrelation between microhardness and wear resistance of dental alloys against monolithic zirconia in The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics with Received January 24, 2021 / Last Revision June 7, 2021 / Accepted June 9, 2021 have https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.127.
  6. Cenk Aktas, Kathrin Puchert,Ekrem Efekan Vurucu,Bilge Ersöz, Salih Veziroglu, and Sinan SenA review on nanocomposite coatings in dentistryin Springer open access Received: 19 February 2024 Accepted: 17 June 2024 Published online: 9 July 2024 with https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09915-8.
Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume 13
05
Received 16/01/2025
Accepted 22/02/2025
Published 12/07/2025
Publication Time 177 Days
32

[last_name]

My IP

PlumX Metrics