Electric Scooty Purchasing Recommendations Using Customer Review

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2025 | Volume : 12 | 02 | Page : –
    By

    Khushi Gupta,

  • Aarohi Chaudhary,

  • Khushi Kaushik,

  • Shobha Chaudhary,

  1. Student, Department of Information Technology, Meerut Institute of Engineering and Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
  2. Student, Department of Information Technology, Meerut Institute of Engineering and Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
  3. Student, Department of Information Technology, Meerut Institute of Engineering and Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
  4. Assistant Professor, Department of Information Technology, Meerut Institute of Engineering and Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_196553’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

As environmental awareness and sustainable practices have grown, E-scooters, often known as electric scooters, have gained popularity as a replacement for traditional automobiles This research focuses on developing a recommendation framework for purchasing e-scooters, leveraging customer reviews as the primary data source. By analyzing reviews from diverse platforms, the framework aims to identify critical factors influencing customer satisfaction, including performance, battery life, design, comfort, and cost-efficiency. When we are considering things online, we frequently start by reading online reviews. When assessing a possible acquisition, we might have particular question in mind. We have to either search through many customer evaluations in an attempt to locate pertinent information, or we may use a Q&A system to ask the community directly for an answer. The rapid growth of electric bike market has led to overwhelming number of available options for consumers, making the process of selecting the most suitable process of selecting the customer feedback in enhancing product quality and promoting the adoption of sustainable transportation solutions.

Keywords: E-Bike, Brand comparison, Natural language processing (NLP), Eco-friendly vehicles, Review based analysis

How to cite this article:
Khushi Gupta, Aarohi Chaudhary, Khushi Kaushik, Shobha Chaudhary. Electric Scooty Purchasing Recommendations Using Customer Review. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research & Advances. 2025; 12(02):-.
How to cite this URL:
Khushi Gupta, Aarohi Chaudhary, Khushi Kaushik, Shobha Chaudhary. Electric Scooty Purchasing Recommendations Using Customer Review. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research & Advances. 2025; 12(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joaira/article=2025/view=0


document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_196553’);});Edit

References

  1. Eccarius T, Lu CC. Powered two-wheelers for sustainable mobility: A review of consumer adoption of electric motorcycles. International journal of sustainable transportation. 2020 Jan 2;14(3):215-31.
  2. Roy A, Das A, Ghosh A, Ray M, Tewari A, Chattaraj D. Exploring the Relationship of Factors Affecting Consumers’ Buying Behaviour for Scooty in Kolkata. American Journal of Business and Management Research (AJBMR). 2024;5(1):5.
  3. McAuley J, Yang A. Addressing complex and subjective product-related queries with customer reviews. InProceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web 2016 Apr 11 (pp. 625-635).
  4. Ho MH, Chung HF. Customer engagement, customer equity and repurchase intention in mobile apps. Journal of business research. 2020 Dec 1;121:13-21.
  5. Kazemzadeh K, Ronchi E. From bike to electric bike level-of-service. Transport reviews. 2022 Jan 2;42(1):6-31.
  6. Fishman E, Cherry C. E-bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research. Transport reviews. 2016 Jan 2;36(1):72-91.
  7. Narayanan S, Antoniou C. Electric cargo cycles-A comprehensive review. Transport policy. 2022 Feb 1;116:278-303.
  8. Brezovec P, Hampl N. Electric vehicles ready for breakthrough in MaaS? consumer adoption of E-car sharing and E-scooter sharing as a part of mobility-as-a-service (MaaS). Energies. 2021 Feb 19;14(4):1088.
  9. Soliman KM, Abdul-Hamid M, Othman AI. Effect of carnosine on gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity. Medical science monitor. 2007 Mar 1;13(3):BR73-83.
  10. Mudambi SM, Schuff D. Research note: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. MIS quarterly. 2010 Mar 1:185-200.
  11. Hwang JJ. Sustainable transport strategy for promoting zero-emission electric scooters in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010 Jun 1;14(5):1390-9.
  12. Zakaria HA, Hamid MO, Abdellatif EM, Imane AM. Recent advancements and developments for electric vehicle technology. In2019 International Conference of Computer Science and Renewable Energies (ICCSRE) 2019 Jul 22 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  13. Karahan İ, Kaplan Y, Ünaldı GG. The Current Situation of the Development of Electric Vehicle Technology in Turkey. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi. 2022(36):284-7.
  14. Larminie J, Lowry J. Electric vehicle technology explained. John Wiley & Sons; 2012 Jul 11.
  15. Aman JJ, Smith-Colin J, Zhang W. Listen to E-scooter riders: Mining rider satisfaction factors from app store reviews. Transportation research part D: transport and environment. 2021 Jun 1;95:102856.
  16. Tran M, Banister D, Bishop JD, McCulloch MD. Realizing the electric-vehicle revolution. Nature climate change. 2012 May;2(5):328-33.
  17. Chan CC, Chau KT. Modern electric vehicle technology. Oxford University Press, USA; 2001.
  18. Poullikkas A. Sustainable options for electric vehicle technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015 Jan 1;41:1277-87.
  19. Baptista CM, Herrera GE, Piedrahíta LZ. Entre el hogar y el asfalto: relatos y experiencia de vida de habitantes en condición de calle. Revista Lasallista de investigación. 2017;14(2):65-72.
  20. Xing J, Leard B, Li S. What does an electric vehicle replace?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2021 May 1;107:102432.
  21. Bozzi AD, Aguilera A. Shared E-scooters: A review of uses, health and environmental impacts, and policy implications of a new micro-mobility service. Sustainability. 2021 Aug 4;13(16):8676.
  22. Button K, Frye H, Reaves D. Economic regulation and E-scooter networks in the USA. Research in transportation economics. 2020 Dec 1;84:100973.
  23. Hardt C, Bogenberger K. Usage of e-scooters in urban environments. Transportation research procedia. 2019 Jan 1;37:155-62.
  24. Trivedi TK, Liu C. Anna;, Antonio LM, Wheaton N, Kreger V, et al. Injuries Associated With Standing Electric Scooter Use. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(1):187381.
  25. Çallı L, Çallı BA. Value‐centric analysis of user adoption for sustainable urban micro‐mobility transportation through shared e‐scooter services. Sustainable Development. 2024 Dec;32(6):6408-33.
  26. Dean MD, Zuniga-Garcia N. Shared e-scooter trajectory analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic in Austin, Texas. Transportation Research Record. 2023 Apr;2677(4):432-47.
  27. Khande MS, Patil MA, Andhale MG, Shirsat MR. Design and Development of Electric scooter. Energy. 2020;40(60):100.
  28. Freund Y, Schapire RE. A Short Introduction to Boosting. Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence. 1999;14(5):771–80. Available from: https://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~yfreund/papers/IntroToBoosting.pdf
  29. Chen CF, Lee CH. Investigating shared e-scooter users’ customer value co-creation behaviors and their antecedents: Perceived service quality and perceived value. Transport Policy. 2023 Jun 1;136:147-54.
  30. Sivadas E, Baker‐Prewitt JL. An examination of the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and store loyalty. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 2000 Mar 1;28(2):73-82.
  31. Yang H, Huo J, Bao Y, Li X, Yang L, Cherry CR. Impact of e-scooter sharing on bike sharing in Chicago. Transportation research part A: policy and practice. 2021 Dec 1;154:23-36.
  32. Wang Y, Wu J, Chen K, Liu P. Are shared electric scooters energy efficient?. Communications in Transportation Research. 2021 Dec 1;1:100022.
  33. Mitra R, Hess PM. Who are the potential users of shared e-scooters? An examination of socio- demographic, attitudinal and environmental factors. Travel behaviour and society. 2021 Apr 1;23:100-7.
  34. Dibaj S, Hosseinzadeh A, Mladenović MN, Kluger R. Where have shared e-scooters taken us so far? A review of mobility patterns, usage frequency, and personas. Sustainability. 2021 Oct 26;13(21):11792.
  35. Aman JJ, Smith-Colin J, Zhang W. Listen to E-scooter riders: Mining rider satisfaction factors from app store reviews. Transportation research part D: transport and environment. 2021 Jun 1;95:102856.
  36. Askari S, Javadinasr M, Peiravian F, Khan NA, Auld J, Mohammadian AK. Loyalty toward shared e-scooter: Exploring the role of service quality, satisfaction, and environmental consciousness. Travel Behaviour and Society. 2024 Oct 1;37:100856.
  37. Goulias KG, Shi H. Household Demand for Clean Vehicles in California: Individual Attitudes, Current Car Ownership, and Future Car Ownership. Pacific Southwest Region 9 UTC, University of Southern California; 2025 Apr 15.
  38. Çallı L, Çallı BA. Value‐centric analysis of user adoption for sustainable urban micro‐mobility transportation through shared e‐scooter services. Sustainable Development. 2024 Dec;32(6):6408-33.
  39. Kazemzadeh K, Sprei F. Towards an electric scooter level of service: A review and framework. Travel behaviour and society. 2022 Oct 1;29:149-64.
Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume 12
02
Received 23/04/2025
Accepted 30/04/2025
Published 12/07/2025
Publication Time 80 Days
276

[first_name] [last_name]

My IP

PlumX Metrics