Phase-Specific Nutrient Requirements in Broilers: Implications for Behavior, Gut Health, Performance, Meat Quality, Welfare, and Economics

Year : 2025 | Volume : | : | Page : –
By
vector

Md. Emran Hossain,

vector

Shilpi Islam,

  1. Professor, Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Khulshi, Chattogram, , Bangladesh
  2. Professor, Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Salna, Gazipur, , Bangladesh

Abstract

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_abs_149185’);});Edit Abstract & Keyword

The broiler industry plays inevitable role for global food security, requiring optimal formulation strategies tailored to each growth phase, starter, grower, and finisher for sustainable production. This review explores phase-specific nutrient requirements and their implications for broiler performance, meat quality, welfare, and economics. During the starter phase (1-10 days), nutrition focuses on immune development, gut health, and skeletal growth, with high protein and low energy needs. In the grower phase (11-20 days), nutrient strategies prioritize muscle growth and feed efficiency while preventing excessive fat accumulation. The finisher phase (21 days to market) aims for optimal body weight and carcass quality by enhancing high energy and moderate protein intake. Beyond growth, phase-specific nutrition influences behavior, reducing stress-related behaviors like feather pecking. It also enhances gut health, improving nutrient absorption and reducing disease risk through additives like prebiotics and probiotics. Meat quality is affected by early protein intake for muscle development and dietary fat for improved meat composition. Welfare is enhanced by addressing phase-specific issues such as leg health, metabolic disorders, and immune function, reducing mortality rates. Economically, tailored diets improve feed conversion ratios, reduce feed waste, and lower veterinary costs, leading to improved profitability. Overall, precise phase-specific nutrient strategies optimize broiler performance, welfare, meat quality, and economic efficiency, supporting sustainable production and meeting consumer demands for high-quality poultry products.

Keywords: Broiler, gut health, meat quality, performance, welfare, poultry behavior, nutrient requirements, economic implications

How to cite this article:
Md. Emran Hossain, Shilpi Islam. Phase-Specific Nutrient Requirements in Broilers: Implications for Behavior, Gut Health, Performance, Meat Quality, Welfare, and Economics. Research & Reviews : A Journal of Life Sciences. 2025; ():-.
How to cite this URL:
Md. Emran Hossain, Shilpi Islam. Phase-Specific Nutrient Requirements in Broilers: Implications for Behavior, Gut Health, Performance, Meat Quality, Welfare, and Economics. Research & Reviews : A Journal of Life Sciences. 2025; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjols/article=2025/view=0

document.addEventListener(‘DOMContentLoaded’,function(){frmFrontForm.scrollToID(‘frm_container_ref_149185’);});Edit

References

  1. F. V. Ivanovich, O. A. Karlovich, R. Mahdavi, and E. I. Afanasyevich, “Nutrient density of prestarter diets from one to ten days of age affects intestinal morphometry, enzyme activity, serum indices and performance of broiler chickens,” Anim. Nutr., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 258–265, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.06.005.
  2. Akinbobola, “Nutrient Requirement of Broilers,” Livestocking, pp. 1–11, 2018.
  3. S. Sokanyile, “How phase feeding manipulation affects growth performance, feed cost, carcass characteristics and thequality of meat from broilers?,” 2017, University of Fort Hare.
  4. D. Pan and Z. Yu, “Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet,” Gut Microbes, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 108–119, 2014.
  5. A. A. Shehata et al., “Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Phytogenic Substances for Optimizing Gut Health in Poultry,” Microorganisms, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–34, 2022, doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020395.
  6. C. M. Ncho, J. I. Berdos, V. Gupta, A. Rahman, K. T. Mekonnen, and A. Bakhsh, “Abiotic stressors in poultry production: A comprehensive review,” J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl)., no. July, 2024, doi: 10.1111/jpn.14032.
  7. L. Zhao et al., “Stage-specific nutritional management and developmental programming to optimize meat production,” J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40104-022-00805-0.
  8. P. Maharjan et al., “Review: Physiological growth trend of current meat broilers and dietary protein and energy management approaches for sustainable broiler production,” Animal, vol. 15, p. 100284, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100284.
  9.  V. Ravindran and M. Reza Abdollahi, “Nutrition and digestive physiology of the broiler chick: State of the art and outlook,” Animals, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 2795, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ani11102795.
  10.  D. H. Baker, “Advances in protein-amino acid nutrition of poultry,” Amino Acids, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 29–41, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0198-3.
  11. J. Choi, B. Kong, B. C. Bowker, H. Zhuang, and W. K. Kim, “Nutritional Strategies to Improve Meat Quality and Composition in the Challenging Conditions of Broiler Production: A Review,” Animals, vol. 13, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ani13081386.
  12. M. M. van Krimpen, R. P. Kwakkel, G. André, C. M. C. van der Peet-Schwering, L. A. den Hartog, and M. W. A. Verstegen, “Impact of nutritional factors on feather pecking behaviour of laying hens in non-cage housing systems,” World Poult. Sci. Assoc. Proc. 16th Eur. Symp. Poult. Nutr. Strasbourg, Fr. 26-30 August, 2007, pp. 415–422, 2007.
  13.  C. Mindus et al., “L. rhamnosus improves the immune response and tryptophan catabolism in laying hen pullets,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98459-x.
  14.  N. T. Linh, B. Guntoro, and N. H. Qui, “Immunomodulatory, behavioral, and nutritional response of tryptophan application on poultry,” Vet. World, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 2244–2250, 2021, doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.2244-2250.
  15.  S. Burgos, D. V. Bohorquez, and S. A. Burgos, “Vitamin deficiency-induced neurological diseases of poultry,” Int. J. Poult. Sci., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 804–807, 2006, doi: 10.3923/ijps.2006.804.807.
  16.  R. H. Bradshaw and R. D. K. and D. M. Broom, “A review of the aetiology and pathology of leg weakness in broilers in relation to welfare,” Avian Poult. Biol., p. 83, 2002.
  17.  M. Shakeri, E. Oskoueian, H. H. Le, and M. Shakeri, “Strategies to combat heat stress in broiler chickens: Unveiling the roles of selenium, vitamin E and vitamin C,” Vet. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 71, 2020, doi: 10.3390/VETSCI7020071.
  18.  Y. feng Yang et al., “Effect of dietary calcium or phosphorus deficiency on bone development and related calcium or phosphorus metabolic utilization parameters of broilers from 22 to 42 days of age,” J. Integr. Agric., vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 2775–2783, 2020, doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63302-0.
  19. A. Qamar et al., “The role of intestinal microbiota in chicken health, intestinal physiology and immunity,” J. Anim. Plant Sci., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 342–351, 2020, doi: 10.36899/JAPS.2021.2.0221.
  20.   R. Jha, A. K. Singh, S. Yadav, J. F. D. Berrocoso, and B. Mishra, “Early nutrition programming (in ovo and post-hatch feeding) as a strategy to modulate gut health of poultry,” Front. Vet. Sci., vol. 6, p. 82, 2019.
  21.  G. Zoumpopoulou et al., “Probiotics and prebiotics: An overview on recent trends,” Probiotics Prebiotics Anim. Heal. Food Saf., pp. 1–34, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-71950-4_1.
  22.  R. Jha and P. Mishra, “Dietary fiber in poultry nutrition and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, gut health, and on the environment: a review,” J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40104-021-00576-0.
  23. G. Tellez-Isaias et al., “Effects of chronic stress and intestinal inflammation on commercial poultry health and performance: A review,” Ger. J. Vet. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 38–57, 2023, doi: 10.51585/gjvr.2023.1.0051.
  24.   S. A. Adedokun and O. C. Olojede, “Optimizing gastrointestinal integrity in poultry: The role of nutrients and feed additives,” Front. Vet. Sci., vol. 5, no. JAN, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00348.
  25.  M. Alagawany et al., “Nutritional significance and health benefits of omega-3, -6 and -9 fatty acids in animals,” Anim. Biotechnol., vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1678–1690, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10495398.2020.1869562.
  26. S. P. Macelline, P. V. Chrystal, S. Y. Liu, and P. H. Selle, “The dynamic conversion of dietary protein and amino acids into chicken-meat protein,” Animals, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 2288, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ani11082288.
  27.  M. Alagawany et al., “Nutritional significance of amino acids, vitamins and minerals as nutraceuticals in poultry production and health–a comprehensive review,” Vet. Q., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2020, doi: 10.1080/01652176.2020.1857887.
  28.  A. Massuquetto, J. C. Panisson, V. G. Schramm, D. Surek, E. L. Krabbe, and A. Maiorka, “Effects of feed form and energy levels on growth performance, carcass yield and nutrient digestibility in broilers,” Animal, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1139–1146, 2020, doi: 10.1017/S1751731119003331.
  29.  B. I. Fancher and L. S. Jensen, “Dietary protein level and essential amino acid content: influence upon female broiler performance during the grower period.,” Poult. Sci., vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 897–908, 1989, doi: 10.3382/ps.0680897.
  30.  V. B. Brewer, J. L. Emmert, J. F. C. Meullenet, and C. M. Owens, “Small bird programs: Effect of phase-feeding, strain, sex, and debone time on meat quality of broilers,” Poult. Sci., vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 499–504, 2012, doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01706.
  31.  M. Pečjak, J. Leskovec, A. Levart, J. Salobir, and V. Rezar, “Effects of Dietary Vitamin E, Vitamin C, Selenium and Their Combination on Carcass Characteristics, Oxidative Stability and Breast Meat Quality of Broiler Chickens Exposed to Cyclic Heat Stress,” Animals, vol. 12, no. 14, p. 1789, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ani12141789.
  32.  E. U. Ahiwe, A. A. Omede, M. B. Abdallh, and P. A. Iji, “Managing Dietary Energy Intake by Broiler Chickens to Reduce Production Costs and Improve Product Quality,” Anim. Husb. Nutr., 2018, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.76972.
  33. P. M. Pisulewski, “Nutritional potential for improving meat quality in poultry,” Anim. Sci. Pap. Reports, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 303–315, 2005.
  34.  R. Bou, R. Codony, A. Tres, E. A. Decker, and F. Guardiola, “Dietary strategies to improve nutritional value, oxidative stability, and sensory properties of poultry products,” Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 800–822, 2009, doi: 10.1080/10408390902911108.
  35.  D. Ibrahim et al., “Effect of dietary modulation of selenium form and level on performance, tissue retention, quality of frozen stored meat and gene expression of antioxidant status in ross broiler chickens,” Animals, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 342, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ani9060342.
  36.  R. A. Lilly, M. W. Schilling, J. L. Silva, J. M. Martin, and A. Corzo, “The effects of dietary amino acid density in broiler feed on carcass characteristics and meat quality,” J. Appl. Poult. Res., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 56–67, 2011, doi: 10.3382/japr.2010-00222.
  37.  C. C. Whitehead, “Nutrition and poultry welfare,” Worlds. Poult. Sci. J., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 349–356, 2002, doi: 10.1079/WPS20020027.
  38.   S. S. Nielsen et al., “Welfare of broilers on farm,” EFSA J., vol. 21, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7788.
  39.  E. Gonzales, J. Buyse, T. S. Takita, J. R. Sartori, and E. Decuypere, “Metabolic Disturbances in Male Broilers of Different Strains. 1. Performance, Mortality, and Right Ventricular Hypertrophy,” Poult. Sci., vol. 77, no. 11, pp. 1646–1653, 1998, doi: 10.1093/ps/77.11.1646.
  40.  R. J. Julian, “Rapid Growth Problems: Ascites and Skeletal Deformities in Broilers,” Poult. Sci., vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 1773–1780, 1998, doi: 10.1093/ps/77.12.1773.
  41.  O. M. Alabi et al., “Effect of litter management systems on incidence and severity of footpad dermatitis among broilers at finisher stage,” Transl. Anim. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1093/tas/txad145.
  42.  M. Brink, G. P. J. Janssens, P. Demeyer, Ö. Bağci, and E. Delezie, “Reduction of dietary crude protein and feed form: Impact on broiler litter quality, ammonia concentrations, excreta composition, performance, welfare, and meat quality,” Anim. Nutr., vol. 9, pp. 291–303, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.12.009.
  43.  W. Powers and R. Angel, “A review of the capacity for nutritional strategies to address environmental challenges in poultry production,” Poult. Sci., vol. 87, no. 10, pp. 1929–1938, 2008, doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00090.
  44.  A. F. Moss, P. V. Chrystal, D. J. Cadogan, S. J. Wilkinson, T. M. Crowley, and M. Choct, “Precision feeding and precision nutrition: A paradigm shift in broiler feed formulation?,” Anim. Biosci., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 354–362, 2021, doi: 10.5713/ab.21.0034.
  45.  L. Ózsvár, R. Tisóczki, Á. Bartha, and M. K. ÍHorváth, “the Cost-Benefit Analysis of Application of Vitamin and Mineral Supplements in Broiler Chicken Production,” Hungarian Agric. Eng., vol. 7410, no. 31, pp. 45–51, 2017, doi: 10.17676/hae.2017.31.45.
  46.  A. A. El-Deek et al., “Alternative feed ingredients in the finisher diets for sustainable broiler production,” Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74950-9.
  47.  E. H. Leone and I. Estévez, “Economic and welfare benefits of environmental enrichment for broiler breeders,” Poult. Sci., vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2008, doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00154.
Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume
Received 28/12/2024
Accepted 12/01/2025
Published 18/01/2025
156