DESIGN OF POST-TENSIONED SLAB & ITS BEHAVIOUR WITH OPENING

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : August 8, 2024 at 10:44 am | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume : [else] Volume :[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : | Page : –

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

vector

n

n

Swapnil Ramlal Shinde, L.G. Kalurkar,

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Student, Professor Department of Civil Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Engineering College, Chh.Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad), Maharashtra, India, Department of Civil Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Engineering College, Chh.Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad), Maharashtra, India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nWe live in a fast-paced world where every aspect of life has evolved. In this technological era, the need for change is constant. Many consumer goods have been adapted to fit the new circumstances.. Post Tensioned slabs are the evolution in the field of design which got enhanced due to need of today’s world and in this requirement of architect or customers are also increased by creating opening in slabs which has column to column support greater than 10 m. In this case we have to do post tensioning with opening. Post Tension slab is more suitable for more than 10 m column supports and with less depth requirement also with less percentage of steel requirement. Due to opening in slab it is important to check the behavior of PT slab that the opening is favorable to it or not. This project involves the use of computer program to perform analysis of Post Tensioned slab structure. ETABS 17.0.1 is used to perform analysis and design of PT slab. Slab with non opening and different opening slabs were studied by using this software. In this project mainly four models were modelled in which one model is of non opening slab and remaining three are of different opening slab by same materials and sections. Then comparison is done by using analysis and design results and then observe the displacement, story drift, stiffness, stresses and reinforcement details.

n

n

n

Keywords: Post tensioned slab, Opening, Story Drift, Story Displacement, ETABS 17

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology(rtcet)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology(rtcet)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Swapnil Ramlal Shinde, L.G. Kalurkar. DESIGN OF POST-TENSIONED SLAB & ITS BEHAVIOUR WITH OPENING. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology. July 22, 2024; ():-.

n

How to cite this URL: Swapnil Ramlal Shinde, L.G. Kalurkar. DESIGN OF POST-TENSIONED SLAB & ITS BEHAVIOUR WITH OPENING. Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology. July 22, 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rtcet/article=July 22, 2024/view=0

nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n

n[if 992 not_equal=’Open Access’] [/if 992]n

nn

nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

1. Roschke PN, Inoue M. Effects of banded post-tensioning in Prestressed concrete flat slab. ASCE. 1991. p. 452-459.
2. Faria DM, Lúcio VJG. Strengthening of flat slabs with post-tensioning using anchorages by bonding. Eng Struct. 2011 Feb 28;33(2): p. 438-447.
3. Bahoria BV, Parbat DK. Analysis and Design of RCC and Post-tensioned Flat Slabs Considering Seismic Effect. IACSIT Int J Eng Technol. 2013 Feb;5(1): p. 91-99.
4. Khajehdehi R, Panahshahi N. Effect of openings on in-plane structural behaviour of reinforced concrete floor slabs. Elsevier (CrossMark). 2016; 34: p. 201-213.
5. Kikani R, Davara KN, Trivedi P, Sheladiya B. A Comparative Review on Behavioral Aspect of Post-Tensioning Voided Flat Slab with other Slab Systems. Int J Adv Eng Res Dev. 2017 Nov;4(11): p. 220-229.
6. Shehab HK, Eisa AS, El-Awady KA. Strengthening of Cut-outs in Existing One-Way Spanning RC Flat Slabs Using CFRP Sheets. Int J Concr Struct Mater (CrossMark). 2017;11(2): p. 235-246.
7. Cho AS, Kang T, Jeong K. Computation of Post-Tensioned Slab Deflection under Construction Loads [doctoral dissertation]. RMIT University, Australia; 2017. p. 101-110.
8. Sarkisian M, Long E, Beghini A. New Methods in Efficient Post-Tensioned Slab Design Using Topology Optimization. ASCE. 2017. p. 312-321.
9. Satyanarayanan AJ, Mariadhas HS, Dhanapalan P. Safety and Economy in the Design of Reinforced and Post-Tensioned Slab Systems Using IS, BS, and ACI Standards. ASCE. 2018. p. 529-538.
10. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 456:2000, Indian standard for Plain and reinforced concrete -code of practice. New Delhi: BIS; 2000. p. 1-35.
11. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 1343: 2012, Indian Standard Code of practice for Prestressed Concrete. New Delhi: BIS; 2012. p. 1-46.
12. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016, Indian Standard for Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. New Delhi: BIS; 2016. p. 1-70.
13. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS: 875 (Part 1) – 1987 (Reaffirmed 1997), Indian standard for Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures, Part 1: Dead loads — unit weights of building materials and stored materials. New Delhi: BIS; 1987. p. 1-17.
14. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS: 875 (Part 2) – 1987 (Reaffirmed 2003), Indian standard for Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures, Part 2: Imposed loads. New Delhi: BIS; 1987. p. 18-33.
15. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS: 875 (Part 3) – 2015, Indian standard for Design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures, Part 3: Wind loads. New Delhi: BIS; 2015. p. 34-50.

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””][else]Ahead of Print[/if 424] Subscription Original Research

n

n

n

n

n

Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2249-8753[/if 344]

n

n

n

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424]
Received June 19, 2024
Accepted July 20, 2024
Published July 22, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]