Enhanced Sensitivity Iontronic Pressure Sensor Gauge Using Laser-Created Micro-Pyramid Structures for Wide Linear Range

[{“box”:0,”content”:”[if 992 equals=”Open Access”]n

n

n

n

Open Access

nn

n

n[/if 992]n

n

Year : August 6, 2024 at 12:06 pm | [if 1553 equals=””] Volume : [else] Volume :[/if 1553] | [if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424] : | Page : –

n

n

n

n

n

n

By

n

[foreach 286]n

vector

n

n

Dr. Amit S. Chaudhary, Dr. Bhuvaneshwar D. Patil, Dr. Kishor B. Waghulde, Dr. Rupesh V. Bhortake, Mohini Kolhe, Rakesh Roshan,

n

    n t

  • n

n

n[/foreach]

n

n[if 2099 not_equal=”Yes”]n

    [foreach 286] [if 1175 not_equal=””]n t

  1. Professor, Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. D Y Patil Institute of Technology, Pimpri,Pune,, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MMIT, Lohegaon, Pune,, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. D Y Patil Institute of Technology, Pimpri, Pune,, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. D Y Patil Institute of Technology, Pimpri, Pune,, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. D Y Patil Institute of Technology, Pimpri, Pune,, 6 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dr. D Y Patil Institute of Technology, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra India, India, India, India, India, India
  2. n[/if 1175][/foreach]

n[/if 2099][if 2099 equals=”Yes”][/if 2099]n

n

Abstract

nThe achievement of high sensitivity, ultrahigh pressure resolution, and great linearity across a wide pressure range under huge pressure preloads remains a challenge despite the substantial development of flexible capacitive pressure sensors. Here we offer an ultrathin ionic layer-integrated microstructure creation process that is configurable. At 1700 kPa, the sensor’s linear range sensitivity is 33.7 kPa-1; at 2000 kPa, the pressure resolution is 0.00725%, and the detection limit is 0.36 Pa. Extremely high-resolution smart weight scales and chairs, interactive robotic hands, and delicate pulse detection are just a few of the applications that can benefit from the sensor’s fast response/recovery and outstanding repeatability. Other iontronic sensors may be simply created with the help of the suggested fabrication techniques and design toolkit, which is furthermore useful for rapidly altering the performance of sensor’s performance for the pressure for a range of intended uses. This research shows an improved iontronic pressure sensor gauge that uses laser-cut micro-pyramid shapes to get a large linear range. This new micro-pyramid design greatly expands the touch area and pressure sensitivity, which makes the sensor work better. Laser manufacturing makes sure that the nanoscale is formed precisely and consistently, which leads to results that can be relied on and repeated. Experiments show that the sensor is very sensitive, responds quickly, and has a large linear detecting range. This means it can be used in robots, healthcare, and wearable tech, among other things.

n

n

n

Keywords: Iontronic Pressure Sensor, Laser-Generated Micro-Pyramid Structures, Enhanced Sensitivity, Wide Linear Range, Sensor Gauge Technology

n[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”][This article belongs to Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)]

n

[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”][This article belongs to Special Issue under section in Journal of Polymer and Composites(jopc)][/if 424][if 424 equals=”Conference”]This article belongs to Conference [/if 424]

n

n

n

How to cite this article: Dr. Amit S. Chaudhary, Dr. Bhuvaneshwar D. Patil, Dr. Kishor B. Waghulde, Dr. Rupesh V. Bhortake, Mohini Kolhe, Rakesh Roshan. Enhanced Sensitivity Iontronic Pressure Sensor Gauge Using Laser-Created Micro-Pyramid Structures for Wide Linear Range. Journal of Polymer and Composites. August 6, 2024; ():-.

n

How to cite this URL: Dr. Amit S. Chaudhary, Dr. Bhuvaneshwar D. Patil, Dr. Kishor B. Waghulde, Dr. Rupesh V. Bhortake, Mohini Kolhe, Rakesh Roshan. Enhanced Sensitivity Iontronic Pressure Sensor Gauge Using Laser-Created Micro-Pyramid Structures for Wide Linear Range. Journal of Polymer and Composites. August 6, 2024; ():-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=August 6, 2024/view=0

nn[if 992 equals=”Open Access”] Full Text PDF Download[/if 992] n

n[if 992 not_equal=’Open Access’] [/if 992]n

nn

nn[if 379 not_equal=””]n

Browse Figures

n

n

[foreach 379]n

n[/foreach]n

n

n

n[/if 379]n

n

References

n[if 1104 equals=””]n

  1. Yang W, et al. Multifunctional soft robotic finger based on a nanoscale flexible temperature–pressure tactile sensor for material recognition. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13:55756-65.
  2. Shen Z, Zhu X, Majidi C, Gu G. Cutaneous ionogel mechanoreceptors for soft machines, physiological sensing, and amputee prostheses. Adv Mater. 2021;33:2102069.
  3. Zhong M, et al. Wide linear range and highly sensitive flexible pressure sensor based on multistage sensing process for health monitoring and human-machine interfaces. Chem Eng J. 2021;412:128649.
  4. Hou C, et al. Borophene pressure sensing for electronic skin and human-machine interface. Nano Energy. 2022;97:107189.
  5. Kim K, et al. Highly sensitive and wearable liquid metal-based pressure sensor for health monitoring applications: integration of a 3D-printed microbump array with the microchannel. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8:1900978.
  6. Yang X, Chen S, Shi Y, Fu Z, Zhou B. A flexible highly sensitive capacitive pressure sensor. Sens Actuators A Phys. 2021;324:112629.
  7. Ha KH, et al. Highly sensitive capacitive pressure sensors over a wide pressure range enabled by the hybrid responses of a highly porous nanocomposite. Adv Mater. 2021;33:e2103320.
  8. Ma Z, Zhang J, Li J, Shi Y, Pan L. Frequency-enabled decouplable dual-modal flexible pressure and temperature sensor. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2020;41:1568-71.
  9. Ji B, et al. Gradient architecture-enabled capacitive tactile sensor with high sensitivity and ultrabroad linearity range. Small. 2021;17:e2103312.
  10. Chaudhary AS, et al. Experimental investigation of Gerber frames subjected to elastic lateral torsional buckling. Aust J Mech Eng. 2022.
  11. Chaudhary AS, et al. Pre-buckling structural analysis of thin z-section under uplift loading. J Pharm Negat Results. 2023;2932-43.
  12. Pyo S, Lee J, Kim W, Jo E, Kim J. Multi-layered, hierarchical fabric-based tactile sensors with high sensitivity and linearity in ultrawide pressure range. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1902484.
  13. Bae GY, et al. Pressure/temperature sensing bimodal electronic skin with stimulus discriminability and linear sensitivity. Adv Mater. 2018;30:e1803388.
  14. Choi HB, et al. Transparent pressure sensor with high linearity over a wide pressure range for 3D touch screen applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:16691-9.
  15. Tee BCK, et al. Tunable flexible pressure sensors using microstructured elastomer geometries for intuitive electronics. Adv Funct Mater. 2014;24:5427-34.
  16. Ruth SRA, et al. Rational design of capacitive pressure sensors based on pyramidal microstructures for specialized monitoring of biosignals. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1903100.
  17. Liu YQ, Zhang JR, Han DD, Zhang YL, Sun HB. Versatile electronic skins with biomimetic micronanostructures fabricated using natural reed leaves as templates. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:38084-91.
  18. Liu Z, et al. Natural bamboo leaves as dielectric layers for flexible capacitive pressure sensors with adjustable sensitivity and a broad detection range. RSC Adv. 2021;11:17291-300.
  19. Zheng Y, et al. Highly sensitive electronic skin with a linear response based on the strategy of controlling the contact area. Nano Energy. 2021;85:106013.
  20. Elsayes A, et al. Plant-based biodegradable capacitive tactile pressure sensor using flexible and transparent leaf skeletons as electrodes and flower petal as dielectric layer. Adv Sustain Syst. 2020;4:2000056.
  21. Atalay O, Atalay A, Gafford J, Walsh C. A highly sensitive capacitive-based soft pressure sensor based on a conductive fabric and a microporous dielectric layer. Adv Mater Technol. 2018;3:1700237.
  22. Ji B, et al. Bio-inspired hybrid dielectric for capacitive and triboelectric tactile sensors with high sensitivity and ultrawide linearity range. Adv Mater. 2021;33:2100859.
  23. Chhetry A, Sharma S, Yoon H, Ko S, Park JY. Enhanced sensitivity of capacitive pressure and strain sensor based on CaCu3Ti4O12 wrapped hybrid sponge for wearable applications. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1910020.
  24. Charkha PG, Jaju SB. Analysis & optimization of connecting rod. 2nd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology, ICETET 2009. 2009. p. 86.
  25. Jaju SB, Charkha PG, Kale M. Gas metal arc welding process parameter optimization for AA7075 T6. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1913(1).
  26. Sherje NP, Umbarkar AM, Agrawal SA, Kharche PP, Dhabliya D. Machinability study and optimization of CNC drilling process parameters for HSLA steel with coated and uncoated drill bit. Mater Today Proc. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.1070

nn[/if 1104][if 1104 not_equal=””]n

    [foreach 1102]n t

  1. [if 1106 equals=””], [/if 1106][if 1106 not_equal=””],[/if 1106]
  2. n[/foreach]

n[/if 1104]

nn


nn[if 1114 equals=”Yes”]n

n[/if 1114]

n

n

[if 424 not_equal=””][else]Ahead of Print[/if 424] Open Access Review Article

n

n

n

n

n

Journal of Polymer and Composites

n

[if 344 not_equal=””]ISSN: 2321–2810[/if 344]

n

n

n

n

n

[if 2146 equals=”Yes”][/if 2146][if 2146 not_equal=”Yes”][/if 2146]n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n

n[if 1748 not_equal=””]

[else]

[/if 1748]n

n

n

Volume
[if 424 equals=”Regular Issue”]Issue[/if 424][if 424 equals=”Special Issue”]Special Issue[/if 424] [if 424 equals=”Conference”][/if 424]
Received May 14, 2024
Accepted July 15, 2024
Published August 6, 2024

n

n

n

n

n

n nfunction myFunction2() {nvar x = document.getElementById(“browsefigure”);nif (x.style.display === “block”) {nx.style.display = “none”;n}nelse { x.style.display = “Block”; }n}ndocument.querySelector(“.prevBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(-1);n});ndocument.querySelector(“.nextBtn”).addEventListener(“click”, () => {nchangeSlides(1);n});nvar slideIndex = 1;nshowSlides(slideIndex);nfunction changeSlides(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex += n));n}nfunction currentSlide(n) {nshowSlides((slideIndex = n));n}nfunction showSlides(n) {nvar i;nvar slides = document.getElementsByClassName(“Slide”);nvar dots = document.getElementsByClassName(“Navdot”);nif (n > slides.length) { slideIndex = 1; }nif (n (item.style.display = “none”));nArray.from(dots).forEach(nitem => (item.className = item.className.replace(” selected”, “”))n);nslides[slideIndex – 1].style.display = “block”;ndots[slideIndex – 1].className += ” selected”;n}n”}]