Seasonal Variation in Air Quality Index across Rural and Urban Bihar: A Comparative Study of Gaya City and Kusdihra Village

Year : 2026 | Volume : 03 | Issue : 02 | Page : 33 41
By

Navneet Kumar,

Nidhi Sinha,

  1. UG Scholar, Department of Geography, Ram Krishna Dwarika Mahavidyalaya, Patliputra University, Patna, Bihar, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Ram Krishna Dwarika Mahavidyalaya, Patliputra University, Patna, Bihar, India

Abstract

Air Quality Index (AQI) is a composite indicator used to communicate ambient air-quality conditions and their potential health implications. This study examines spatial and seasonal variation in AQI between Gaya city and Kusdihra village, representing urban and rural settings in Gaya district, Bihar. Secondary AQI observations were obtained from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) National Air Quality Index portal at eight fixed time-slots per day during two 20-day observation windows: 1–20 May 2024 (pre-monsoon) and 1–20 November 2024 (post-monsoon). Study-specific daily means were calculated from the eight observations and used for comparative analysis. The results show that mean AQI at Gaya increased from 132.11 in the pre-monsoon period to 181.77 in the post-monsoon period, while Kusdihra increased from 84.25 to 89.21. Gaya therefore recorded substantially poorer air quality in both periods and a much stronger post-monsoon deterioration. Day-wise observations also reveal marked short-term variability and episodic high-AQI conditions. The observed pattern is interpreted in relation to local anthropogenic activities, seasonal atmospheric dispersion and regional pollution influences, while recognising that the AQI dataset does not permit direct source attribution. The study highlights the value of settlement-sensitive monitoring in the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain and the need to include rural and peri-urban areas in air-quality planning.

Keywords: Air quality index (AQI), rural-urban variation, seasonal variation, pre-monsoon, post-monsoon, Gaya, Kusdihra, Bihar, particulate pollution.

[This article belongs to International Journal of Climate Conditions ]

How to cite this article: Navneet Kumar, Nidhi Sinha. Seasonal Variation in Air Quality Index across Rural and Urban Bihar: A Comparative Study of Gaya City and Kusdihra Village. International Journal of Climate Conditions. 2026; 03(02):33-41.
How to cite this URL: Navneet Kumar, Nidhi Sinha. Seasonal Variation in Air Quality Index across Rural and Urban Bihar: A Comparative Study of Gaya City and Kusdihra Village. International Journal of Climate Conditions. 2026; 03(02):33-41. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/ijcc/article=2026/view=261078

References

1.      Central Pollution Control Board. National air quality index: final report. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Government of India; 2014. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/printrelease.aspx?relid=110654&reg=48&lang=2

2.      Pathak M, Kuttippurath J. Elucidating the changing particulate matter pollution and associated health effects in rural India during 2000–2019. Environmental Pollution. 2024 May 1;348(7):123830.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123830

3.      Ghosh A, Nagar PK, Maddhesia J, Sharma M, Azmi S, Singh B, Dutta M. A district-level emission inventory of anthropogenic PM2. 5 from the primary sources over the Indian Indo Gangetic Plain: identification of the emission hotspots. Science of The Total Environment. 2024 Mar 1; 914(8):169865.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169865

4.      Krishnaveni AS, Madhavan BL, Jain CD, Ratnam MV. Spatial, temporal features and influence of meteorology on PM2. 5 and O3 association across urban and rural environments of India. Atmospheric Environment: X. 2024 Apr 1;22(1):100265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100265

5.      Madhwal S, Tripathi SN, Bergin MH, Bhave P, de Foy B, Reddy TR, Chaudhry SK, Jain V, Garg N, Lalwani P. Evaluation of PM2. 5 spatio-temporal variability and hotspot formation using low-cost sensors across urban-rural landscape in lucknow, India. Atmospheric Environment. 2024 Feb 15;319(11):120302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120302

6.      Mukherjee S, Singh GK, Dutta M, Srivastava V, Qadri AM, Gupta T, Chatterjee A. PM2. 5 pollution exceeding Indian standard over a semi-urban region at eastern IGP: Chemistry, meteorological impact, and long-range transport. Science of the Total Environment. 2023 Nov 10;898:165415.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165415

7.      World Health Organization. WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228

8.      Kumar N, Rafi S, Prasad G, Tahir M. Assessing the trend and status of air quality in NCT Delhi. International Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2021;10(4):84-94.

9.      Ghosh B, De A, Seth M, Ghosh K, Sarkar O, Das S, Mondal S, Ali D, De M, Sultana R, Das D. Evaluating the national burden of PM2. 5 in India: a comprehensive study of spatiotemporal distribution at state and city levels, non-carcinogenic health hazards, and premature mortality. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2025 Dec 12;198(1):43.

10.  Shukla U, Manjunath N. Studies on air quality status at selected pockets of Indian Capital Delhi.  Int Res J Eng Technol. 2018 Aug;5(8):416-20.


Regular Issue Subscription Original Research
Volume 03
Issue 02
Received 08/09/2026
Accepted 23/09/2026
Published 24/09/2026
Publication Time 16 Days


Login

My IP

PlumX Metrics

Support