Development and Multiscale Characterisation of a Sustainable Hybrid Polymer–Cementitious Composite

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 14 | 04 | Page :
By

Mayuri Dnyaneshwar Ahirrao,

Rakesh Patel,

Chaitanya Mishra,

  1. Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Oriental University, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
  2. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Oriental University, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
  3. Head of the Department, Department of Civil Engineering, Oriental University, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract

The development of sustainable polymer–cementitious composites has gained increasing attention as a strategy for reducing virgin resource consumption while improving the mechanical and functional performance of cement-based materials. This study investigates a hybrid composite incorporating sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA), distilled sewage water (DSW), styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR), and polypropylene (PP) fibres. Four mixtures, namely C0–C3, were developed by progressively increasing SCBA from 0 to 15%, DSW from 0 to 20%, SBR polymer solids from 0 to 5%, and PP fibre from 0 to 0.50%. The fresh and hardened behaviour of the composites was evaluated through workability, compressive strength, flexural strength, split tensile strength, and water absorption. In addition, SEM, XRD, FTIR, and TGA–DTG analyses were conducted to establish the microstructural, mineralogical, chemical, and thermal characteristics of the selected composites. The results demonstrated a progressive reduction in workability with increasing modification, with slump values decreasing from 92 mm for C0 to 68 mm for C3. Among the investigated mixtures, C2 (10% SCBA + 10% DSW + 3.5% SBR + 0.50% PP fibre) exhibited the best-performing combined formulation, achieving 28-day compressive, flexural, and split tensile strengths of 40.5, 4.85, and 3.72 MPa, respectively. Compared with C0, these values correspond to improvements of approximately 17.1%, 18.3%, and 18.1%. The 14-day water absorption of C2 was also reduced to 4.28%, compared with 5.18% for C0. SEM revealed dense C–S–H formation, refined pores, SBR polymer-film formation, SCBA–matrix interaction, and effective PP fibre embedding and bridging. XRD and FTIR confirmed the coexistence of silicate-rich mineral phases, hydration products, and polymer-associated functional groups, while TGA–DTG demonstrated distinct thermal decomposition stages and a higher residual mass for C3 at 1000°C. Overall, the findings demonstrate that controlled integration of mineral, polymeric, and fibre phases can produce a sustainable hybrid composite with improved mechanical performance, reduced water absorption, and favorable microstructural characteristics, with C2 providing the most balanced composition among the investigated mixtures.

Keywords: Hybrid polymer–cementitious composite; Sugarcane bagasse ash; Distilled sewage water; Styrene–butadiene rubber; Polypropylene fibre; Sustainable composites; Fibre–matrix interface; Microstructural characterization; Water absorption; Mechanical performance

How to cite this article: Mayuri Dnyaneshwar Ahirrao, Rakesh Patel, Chaitanya Mishra. Development and Multiscale Characterisation of a Sustainable Hybrid Polymer–Cementitious Composite. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(04):-.
How to cite this URL: Mayuri Dnyaneshwar Ahirrao, Rakesh Patel, Chaitanya Mishra. Development and Multiscale Characterisation of a Sustainable Hybrid Polymer–Cementitious Composite. Journal of Polymer & Composites. 2026; 14(04):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/jopc/article=2026/view=255604

References

  1. Koronis G, Silva A, Furtado S. Applications of green composite materials. In: Kalia S, editor. Biodegradable Green Composites. 2016. p. 312-337. doi:10.1002/9781118911068.ch10.
  2. Maiti S, Islam MR, Uddin MA, Afroj S, Eichhorn SJ, Karim N. Sustainable fiber-reinforced composites: a review. Adv Sustain Syst. 2022;6(11):2200258. doi:10.1002/adsu.202200258.
  3. Hubbe MA. Sustainable composites: a review with critical questions to guide future initiatives. Sustainability. 2023;15(14):11088. doi:10.3390/su151411088.
  4. Slamani M, Louhichi B, Amroune S, Jawaid M. Next-generation composite materials and manufacturing: a review of smart, sustainable, and digital advancements. Adv Mater Technol. 2026;11(9):e01409. doi:10.1002/admt.202501409.
  5. Fode TA, Jande YAC, Kivevele T. Effects of different supplementary cementitious materials on durability and mechanical properties of cement composite–comprehensive review. Heliyon. 2023;9(7):e17924. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17924.
  6. Haigh R, Ameri Sianaki O. Traditional and advanced curing strategies for concrete materials: a systematic review of mechanical performance, sustainability, and future directions. Appl Sci. 2025;15(20):11055. doi:10.3390/app152011055.
  7. Fernandez CA, Correa M, Nguyen MT, Rod KA, Dai GL, Cosimbescu L, et al. Progress and challenges in self-healing cementitious materials. J Mater Sci. 2021;56(1):201-230. doi:10.1007/s10853-020-05164-7.
  8. Jhatial AA, Nováková I, Gjerløw E. A review on emerging cementitious materials, reactivity evaluation and treatment methods. Buildings. 2023;13(2):526. doi:10.3390/buildings13020526.
  9. Fang H, Xi L, Huang Y, Zhao T, He R, Kang X, Li Y, Fang D. Fiber-reinforced composites: a comprehensive review of traditional and additive manufacturing processes and material architectures. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2026;205:109684. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2026.109684.
  10. Azevedo AGS, Córdoba KCP, Molano JCA, Savastano H. Fiber–matrix interface engineering in cementitious composites: surface modification, durability and emerging trends. Coatings. 2026;16(8):922. doi:10.3390/coatings16080922.
  11. Srirama D, Yadav MK, Jayanthi PN. Potential of sugarcane bagasse ash for expansive subgrade stabilization for expanding Indian road networks. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2026;24:e06063. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06063.
  12. Louis S, Kuchelar P. Reactive silica enrichment from sugarcane bagasse ash by optimized calcination and alkali activation for zeolite applications. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2026:e70572. doi:10.1002/ep.70572.
  13. Sankeeth S, Prabhath AA, Damruwan HG, Herath HM, Priyadarshana HV, Kumara SP, et al. Optimizing mechanical properties of concrete using sugarcane bagasse ash. Results Eng. 2025;27:105968. doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105968.
  14. Mahmoud M, Salah S, Aziz YHA, El-Sayed TA. Development of sustainable green geopolymer concrete incorporating sugarcane bagasse ash. Sci Rep. 2026;16(1):23490. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-63157-z.
  15. Amin M, Ahmed E, Ahmed SA. Influence of micro and nano eco-friendly materials on sustainable ultra-high-performance concrete properties. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 2026;11:107. doi:10.1007/s41062-025-02461-5.
  16. Arfat MZ, Masood Q, Fiaz U, Riaz H, Ahmad H. Advances in sustainable concrete through industrial waste utilization and nanotechnology. Spectrum Eng Sci. 2026;4(5):3016-3035. Note: I could verify the bibliographic details and Google Scholar record, but this source has weaker indexing/publisher metadata than the other references.
  17. Kalimuthu B, Rajendran M. Effect of waste-derived nano pozzolans on ITZ densification in high-durability and low-carbon concrete. J Sustain Cem Based Mater. 2026;15(9):3246. doi:10.1080/21650373.2026.2677676. Correction: your “1-37” is not the final bibliographic locator; the indexed issue record gives 3246.
  18. Yarra A, Nakkeeran G, Roy D, Alaneme GU. Evaluation of SCBA-replaced cement for carbon credits and reduction in CO2 emissions. Discov Appl Sci. 2025;7:114. doi:10.1007/s42452-025-06487-3.
  19. Shaikh SA, Rajpurohit K, Pandey AK, Bagla HK. Engineering Portland cement and concrete with agricultural-origin functional additives: valorization of agro-waste. Next Sustainability. 2025;6:100173. doi:10.1016/j.nxsust.2025.100173.
  20. Hassan W, Mujtaba H, Alshameri B, Farooq K, Aamir T, Shahzad A. Sustainable remediation: the role of styrene-butadiene rubber latex and chem-lite CR powder in stabilizing dispersive clay. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 2025;17(12):8131-8148. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.06.036.
  21. Xing Y, Hu M, Cao C, Yu J, Zhao J, Zheng H, Guo J. Dispersion mechanism of styrene–butadiene rubber powder modified by itaconic acid and its toughening effect on oil well cement. Materials. 2022;15(23):8345. doi:10.3390/ma15238345.
  22. Alimardani M, Abbassi-Sourki F. New and emerging applications of carboxylated styrene butadiene rubber latex in polymer composites and blends: review from structure to future prospective. J Compos Mater. 2015;49(10):1267-1282. doi:10.1177/0021998314533363.
  23. Xiong Z, Tang Z, He S, Fang Z, Chen Z, Liu F, Li L. Analysis of mechanical properties of rubberised mortar and influence of styrene–butadiene latex on interfacial behaviour of rubber–cement matrix. Constr Build Mater. 2021;300:124027. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124027.
  24. Li G, Morlor CS, Leung C, Wang H. Mechanical properties and fractal analysis of cement mortar incorporating styrene-butadiene rubber latex and carboxylated MWCNTs. Constr Build Mater. 2021;309:125175. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125175.
  25. Sun K, Wang S, Zeng L, Peng X. Effect of styrene-butadiene rubber latex on the rheological behavior and pore structure of cement paste. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;163:282-289. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.017.
  26. Bualuang T, Jitsangiam P, Nusit K, Rattanasak U, Chindaprasirt P. Enhancing lateritic soil for sustainable pavement subbase with polymer-modified cement: a comparative study of styrene butadiene rubber and styrene acrylic latex applications. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2024;21:e03760. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03760.

 


Ahead of Print Subscription Original Research
Volume 14
04
Received 18/08/2026
Accepted 12/09/2026
Published 14/09/2026
Publication Time 27 Days


Login

My IP

PlumX Metrics

Support