Performance enhancementof Discrete Event Simulation in Project Management for Optimal Project Results

Notice

This is an unedited manuscript accepted for publication and provided as an Article in Press for early access at the author’s request. The article will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and galley proof review before final publication. Please be aware that errors may be identified during production that could affect the content. All legal disclaimers of the journal apply.

Year : 2026 | Volume : 16 | 02 | Page :
By

Sajid Raza,

Manoj Kumar,

Viqar Ahmad,

Roshan Zehra,

Shiraj Ahmad,

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Greater Noida Institute of Technology, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Greater Noida Institute of Technology, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  3. Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Greater Noida Institute of Technology, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  4. Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy, Accurate College of Pharmacy, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  5. Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Engineering, Greater Noida Institute of Technology, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

The key to project success is having clear objectives. A lot of projects fail because their outcomes are not clear and the processes required to achieve them are not clear. Conventional methods of project management often operate on fixed schemes and simplifying assumptions which do not convey what actually happens in production or operation management. Ways of working of similar systems use caution in their assessment; the claim is that this undermines efficient deployment of resources and excess capacity in the systems. This study focuses on the use of Discrete Event Simulation (DES) with an aim to improve scope management in projects. Simulation modeling approaches provide dynamic and flexible ways for project managers to study how a system behaves, evaluate options and make informed choices during project implementation. A study shows how adding simulation techniques into the project management framework can improve planning and reduce risk and outcomes. Project management developed as a discipline in the 20th century and has its roots in different fields of application: construction, engineering and defense In the United States two forefathers of project management are Henry Gantt, known as the father of planning and control techniques, who is best known for his use of the Gantt chart (as a project management tool), and Henri Fayol for establishing functions of management—six (6) which form the basis for the bodies of knowledge associated with project and program management.

Keywords: Discrete Event Simulation (DES), Project Management, Project Scope Management, Resource Optimization,Event Chain Methodology (ECM)

How to cite this article: Sajid Raza, Manoj Kumar, Viqar Ahmad, Roshan Zehra, Shiraj Ahmad. Performance enhancementof Discrete Event Simulation in Project Management for Optimal Project Results. Journal of Production Research & Management. 2026; 16(02):-.
How to cite this URL: Sajid Raza, Manoj Kumar, Viqar Ahmad, Roshan Zehra, Shiraj Ahmad. Performance enhancementof Discrete Event Simulation in Project Management for Optimal Project Results. Journal of Production Research & Management. 2026; 16(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/joprm/article=2026/view=254049

References

  1. Banks J, Carson JS, Nelson BL, Nicol DM. Discrete-event system simulation. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson; 2010.
  2. Kerzner H. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. 12th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2017.
  3. Law AM. Simulation modeling and analysis. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015.
  4. Hocken RJ, ed. Technology of machine tools. Vol. 5, Machine tool accuracy. Livermore (CA): Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; 1980.
  5. Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo AN. Error compensation in machine tools—a review: part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture-dependent errors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2000;40(9):1235-1256. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(00)00009-2.
  6. Russell-Hodge J. Total project management: the customer-led organisation. Int J Proj Manag. 1995;13(1):11-17. doi:10.1016/0263-7863(95)95698-D.
  7. Smith, S ‘Towards a more intelligent planning system” lnt J Projec Management, 1992
  8. Robbins SP. Organization theory: structure, design, and applications. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1990.
  9. Gebert H, Geib M, Kolbe L, Riempp G. Towards customer knowledge management: integrating customer relationship management and knowledge management concepts. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB 2002); 2002 Dec 10-13; Taipei, Taiwan. p. 296-298.
  10. Kiridena VSB, Ferreira PM. Mapping the effects of positioning errors on the volumetric accuracy of five-axis CNC machine tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 1993;33(3):417-437. doi:10.1016/0890-6955(93)90049-Z.
  11. Fan KC, Burdekin M. Development of a computer software package for positioning accuracy calibration and analysis on NC machine tools. In: Proceedings of the 26th International MATADOR Conference; 1986. p. 107-113. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-08114-1_15.
  12. Turner JR, Payne JH. The problem of projects of differing size and skill mix. Project Management. 1997;3(1):14-17.

Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume 16
02
Received 02/07/2026
Accepted 14/08/2026
Published 31/08/2026
Publication Time 60 Days


Login

My IP

PlumX Metrics