Enhancing Fiber Digestibility in Dairy Cows: Influence of Dietary, Management, and Environmental Factors

Year : 2026 | Volume : 16 | 02 | Page :
    By

    Md. Emran Hossain,

  1. Professor, Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Khulshi, Chattogram, Bangladesh

Abstract

The digestibility of fiber in dairy cows is a critical factor for optimizing their nutritional efficiency and overall productivity. This study explores the key dietary, management, and environmental factors influencing fiber digestibility in the rumen. Various aspects of feed composition, such as fiber content, protein-to-fiber ratio, and the presence of anti-nutritional factors, play a significant role in determining microbial activity and rumen fermentation efficiency. Physical feed characteristics, including particle size, feed processing methods, and forage maturity, further influence the breakdown of fiber. Environmental factors, such as ambient temperature, humidity, and heat stress, can disrupt rumen function and reduce microbial efficiency, negatively impacting fiber digestion. In addition, management practices such as feed mixing efficiency, stocking density, and access to quality pasture are essential for maintaining optimal rumen conditions and supporting effective fiber utilization. The study also highlights the importance of microbial diversity and the presence of specific microbial populations, including fibrolytic bacteria, in enhancing fiber digestion. Effective use of dietary interventions such as enzyme supplementation, ionophores, and prebiotics can further improve fiber digestibility. By understanding the interplay of these factors, this review provides insights into strategies for enhancing fiber digestion, which is essential for improving feed efficiency, animal health, and sustainable dairy farming practices.

Keywords: Dairy cows, enzyme supplementation, environmental factors, feed composition, feed management, fiber digestibility

How to cite this article:
Md. Emran Hossain. Enhancing Fiber Digestibility in Dairy Cows: Influence of Dietary, Management, and Environmental Factors. Research and Reviews: A Journal of Microbiology and Virology. 2026; 16(02):-.
How to cite this URL:
Md. Emran Hossain. Enhancing Fiber Digestibility in Dairy Cows: Influence of Dietary, Management, and Environmental Factors. Research and Reviews: A Journal of Microbiology and Virology. 2026; 16(02):-. Available from: https://journals.stmjournals.com/rrjomv/article=2026/view=249050


References

  1. Zebeli, J. R. Aschenbach, M. Tafaj, J. Boguhn, B. N. Ametaj, and W. Drochner, “Invited review: Role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 1041–1056, 2012, doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4421.
  2. H. Zhao, T. Zhang, M. Xu, and J. H. Yao, “Effects of physically effective fiber on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and digestibility in goats,” J. Anim. Sci., vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 501–509, 2011, doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3013.
  3. L. Galyean and A. L. Goetsch, “Utilization of forage fiber by ruminants,” Forage Cell Wall Struct. Dig., pp. 33–71, 2015, doi: 10.2134/1993.foragecellwall.c2.
  4. Fustini et al., “Effect of undigested neutral detergent fiber content of alfalfa hay on lactating dairy cows: Feeding behavior, fiber digestibility, and lactation performance,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 4475–4483, 2017, doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12266.
  5. Shi et al., “Dietary Neutral Detergent Fiber Levels Impacting Dairy Cows’ Feeding Behavior, Rumen Fermentation, and Production Performance during the Period of Peak-Lactation,” 2023, mdpi.com. doi: 10.3390/ani13182876.
  6. E. Beane et al., “Effects of dietary fibers, micronutrients, and phytonutrients on gut microbiome: a review,” 2021, Springer. doi: 10.1186/s13765-021-00605-6.
  7. Cavallini, A. Concolino, L. Mammi, and …, “Factors influencing fiber digestibility in dairy cows,” J. Dairy …, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://cris.unibo.it/handle/11585/804412%0Ahttps://cris.unibo.it/bitstream/11585/804412/2/PIIS002203022030816X.pdf
  8. D. Aschalew et al., “Effects of physically effective fiber on rumen and milk parameters in dairy cows: A review,” Indian J. Anim. Res., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 1317–1323, 2020, doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-1104.
  9. Xie, J. Gao, and G. Zhao, “Dietary Supplementation with Sodium Sulfate Improves Rumen Fermentation, Fiber Digestibility, and the Plasma Metabolome through Modulation of Rumen Bacterial Communities in Steers,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., vol. 86, no. 22, pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.1128/AEM.01412-20.
  10. Makki, E. C. Deehan, J. Walter, and F. Bäckhed, “The Impact of Dietary Fiber on Gut Microbiota in Host Health and Disease,” 2018, cell.com. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.012.
  11. Korcz, Z. Kerényi, and L. Varga, “Dietary fibers, prebiotics, and exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria: Potential health benefits with special regard to cholesterol-lowering effects,” Food Funct., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 3057–3068, 2018, doi: 10.1039/c8fo00118a.
  12. S. Oldick and J. L. Firkins, “Effects of degree of fat saturation on fiber digestion and microbial protein synthesis when diets are fed twelve times daily,” J. Anim. Sci., vol. 78, no. 9, pp. 2412–2420, 2000, doi: 10.2527/2000.7892412x.
  13. T. Amminga, “Influence of feeding management on ruminant fiber digestibility,” Forage Cell Wall Struct. Dig., pp. 571–602, 2015, doi: 10.2134/1993.foragecellwall.c22.
  14. Chen, C. Wang, S. Huasai, and A. Chen, “Effects of dietary forage to concentrate ratio on nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation and rumen bacterial composition in Angus cows,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 17023, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96580-5.
  15. Yang, C. Wei, G. Y. Zhao, Z. W. Xu, and S. X. Lin, “Effects of dietary supplementing tannic acid in the ration of beef cattle on rumen fermentation, methane emission, microbial flora and nutrient digestibility,” J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl)., vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 302–310, 2017, doi: 10.1111/jpn.12531.
  16. Huhtanen, M. Rinne, and J. Nousiainen, “A meta-analysis of feed digestion in dairy cows. 2. The effects of feeding level and diet composition on digestibility,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 5031–5042, 2009, doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1834.
  17. Oba and M. S. Allen, “Evaluation of the importance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage: Effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 589–596, 1999, doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75271-9.
  18. O. Hendawy et al., “Effects of selenium supplementation on rumen microbiota, rumen fermentation and apparent nutrient digestibility of ruminant animals: A review,” Fermentation, vol. 8, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.3390/fermentation8010004.
  19. Brask, P. Lund, A. L. F. Hellwing, M. Poulsen, and M. R. Weisbjerg, “Enteric methane production, digestibility and rumen fermentation in dairy cows fed different forages with and without rapeseed fat supplementation,” Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., vol. 184, no. 1–4, pp. 67–79, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.06.006.
  20. Wang et al., “Improvement of feed intake, digestibility, plasma metabolites, and lactation performance of dairy cows fed mixed silage of sugar beet pulp and rice straw inoculated with lactic acid bacteria,” 2022, Elsevier. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20494.
  21. Yang et al., “Alterations in nutrient digestibility and performance of heat-stressed dairy cows by dietary L-theanine supplementation,” 2022, Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.08.002.
  22. A. Mousa, M. A. Allak, M. G. Shehata, N. M. Hashem, and O. G. A. Hassan, “Dietary Supplementation with a Combination of Fibrolytic Enzymes and Probiotics Improves Digestibility, Growth Performance, Blood Metabolites, and Economics of Fattening Lambs,” 2022, mdpi.com. doi: 10.3390/ani12040476.
  23. Grossi, R. Compiani, L. Rossi, M. Dell’anno, I. Castillo, and C. A. Sgoifo Rossi, “Effect of slow-release urea administration on production performance, health status, diet digestibility, and environmental sustainability in lactating dairy cows,” 2021, mdpi.com. doi: 10.3390/ani11082405.
  24. Hassanat and C. Benchaar, “Corn silage-based diet supplemented with increasing amounts of linseed oil: Effects on methane production, rumen fermentation, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen utilization, and milk production of dairy cows,” 2021, Elsevier. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18853.
  25. Rehman et al., “Nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, and milk production of mid-lactation Jersey × Friesian cows fed diets containing different proportions of rumen-undegradable protein,” 2020, SciELO Brasil. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202020180787.
  26. Hassanat, R. Gervais, and C. Benchaar, “Methane production, ruminal fermentation characteristics, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, and milk production of dairy cows fed conventional or brown midrib corn silage,” 2017, Elsevier. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11862.
  27. Shakira, M. Qubtia, I. Ahmed, F. Hasan, M. I. Anjum, and M. Imran, “Effect of indigenously isolated saccharomyces cerevisiae probiotics on milk production, nutrient digestibility, blood chemistry and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows,” 2018, thejaps.org.pk. [Online]. Available: http://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/Accepted/2007/28-2/10.pdf
  28. Huhtanen, M. Rinne, and J. Nousiainen, “A meta-analysis of feed digestion in dairy cows. 2. The effects of feeding level and diet composition on digestibility,” 2009, Elsevier. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1834.
  29. Bernabucci, N. Lacetera, P. P. Danieli, P. Bani, A. Nardone, and B. Ronchi, “Influence of different periods of exposure to hot environment on rumen function and diet digestibility in sheep,” Int. J. Biometeorol., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 387–395, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s00484-009-0223-6.
  30. Moallem, H. Lehrer, L. Livshitz, M. Zachut, and S. Yakoby, “The effects of live yeast supplementation to dairy cows during the hot season on production, feed efficiency, and digestibility,” 2009, Elsevier. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0839.
  31. R. Sánchez and I. Ledin, “Effect of feeding different levels of foliage from Cratylia argentea to creole dairy cows on intake, digestibility, milk production and milk composition,” Trop. Anim. Health Prod., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 343–351, 2006, doi: 10.1007/s11250-006-4314-7.
  32. Sales and G. P. J. Janssens, “Acid-insoluble ash as a marker in digestibility studies: A review,” 2003, jafs.com.pl. doi: 10.22358/jafs/67718/2003.
  33. O. Chow, V. S. Baron, R. Corbett, and M. Oba, Effects of planting date on fiber digestibility of whole-crop barley and productivity of lactating dairy cows, vol. 91, no. 4. library-archives.canada.ca, 2008. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0854.
  34. S. Morsy, Y. A. Soltan, H. M. El-Zaiat, S. M. Alencar, and A. L. Abdalla, “Bee propolis extract as a phytogenic feed additive to enhance diet digestibility, rumen microbial biosynthesis, mitigating methane formation and health status of late pregnant ewes,” Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., vol. 273, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114834.
  35. Zebeli, M. Tafaj, I. Weber, J. Dijkstra, H. Steingass, and W. Drochner, “Effects of varying dietary forage particle size in two concentrate levels on chewing activity, ruminai mat characteristics, and passage in dairy cows,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1929–1942, 2007, doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-354.
  36. [36] D. Maulfair, M. Fustini, and A. J. Heinrichs, “Effect of varying total mixed ration particle size on rumen digesta and fecal particle size and digestibility in lactating dairy cows,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 3527–3536, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3718.
  37. [37] Evangelista, F. Petrocchi Jasinski, L. Basiricò, G. Turriziani, and U. Bernabucci, “Particle size distribution of total mixed rations fed to Italian Mediterranean buffaloes measured by the PSPS: impact on milk quality and digestibility,” Ital. J. Anim. Sci., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1535–1550, 2024, doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2024.2417714.
  38. [38] K. Miller-Cushon and T. J. DeVries, “Effect of dietary dry matter concentration on the sorting behavior of lactating dairy cows fed a total mixed ration,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 92, no. 7, pp. 3292–3298, 2009, doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1772.
  39. Abulaiti et al., “Effect of dietary Chinese herbal preparation on dry matter intake, milk yield and milk composition, serum biochemistry, hematological profile, and reproductive efficiency of Holstein dairy cows in early postpartum period,” 2024, frontiersin.org. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1434548.
  40. Ncisana et al., “Water regimes in selected fodder radish (Raphanus sativus) genotypes: Effects on nutritional value and in vitro ruminal dry matter degradability,” 2024, com. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29203.
  41. Ahmad, M. Jamil, S. Ullah, and M. Ali, “Examine the Effects of Climate Change on Forage Quality and its Subsequent Impact on Milk Yield and Composition,” Indus J. …, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://induspublishers.com/IJBR/article/view/431
  42. Zhou et al., “Effects of dietary concentrate: forage ratio on development of gastrointestinal tract in black Tibetan sheep,” J. Appl. Anim. Res., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 192–197, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09712119.2022.2053131.
  43. Z. Yang and K. A. Beauchemin, “Increasing physically effective fiber content of dairy cow diets through forage proportion versus forage chop length: Chewing and ruminal pH,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 1603–1615, 2009, doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1379.
  44. AlZahal, L. Dionissopoulos, A. H. Laarman, N. Walker, and B. W. McBride, “Active dry Saccharomyces cerevisiae can alleviate the effect of subacute ruminal acidosis in lactating dairy cows,” 2014, Elsevier. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8212.
  45. Xu et al., “Gut Microbiota and Their Role in Health and Metabolic Disease of Dairy Cow,” 2021, frontiersin.org. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.701511.
  46. Chaucheyras-Durand, N. D. Walker, and A. Bach, “Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future,” Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., vol. 145, no. 1–4, pp. 5–26, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.019.
  47. Anadón, I. Ares, M. R. Martínez-Larrañaga, and M. A. Martínez, “Prebiotics and Probiotics in Feed and Animal Health,” Nutraceuticals Vet. Med., pp. 261–285, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04624-8_19.
  48. Nova, S. Gómez-Martinez, and R. González-Soltero, “The Influence of Dietary Factors on the Gut Microbiota,” 2022, mdpi.com. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071368.
  49. Wu et al., “Effect of Dietary Protein and Processing on Gut Microbiota—A Systematic Review,” 2022, mdpi.com. doi: 10.3390/nu14030453.
  50. K. Singh et al., “Beneficial effects of dietary polyphenols on gut microbiota and strategies to improve delivery efficiency,” 2019, mdpi.com. doi: 10.3390/nu11092216.
  51. Uyeno, S. Shigemori, and T. Shimosato, “Effect of probiotics/prebiotics on cattle health and productivity,” Microbes Environ., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 126–132, 2015, doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14176.
  52. J. Rojas and H. H. Stein, “Processing of ingredients and diets and effects on nutritional value for pigs,” 2017, Springer. doi: 10.1186/s40104-017-0177-1.
  53. Wanapat, S. Polyorach, K. Boonnop, C. Mapato, and A. Cherdthong, “Effects of treating rice straw with urea or urea and calcium hydroxide upon intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and milk yield of dairy cows,” Livest. Sci., vol. 125, no. 2–3, pp. 238–243, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.05.001.
  54. Dehghan-banadaky, R. Corbett, and M. Oba, “Effects of barley grain processing on productivity of cattle,” Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., vol. 137, no. 1–2, pp. 1–24, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.11.021.
  55. Zoabi et al., “Feeding Sodium Hydroxide-Treated Almond Hulls to Assaf Sheep: Effects on Chemical Composition, Nutrient Digestibility, and Zootechnical Performance,” 2025, researchgate.net. doi: 10.3390/agriculture15091000.
  56. Giallongo et al., “Effects of slow-release urea and rumen-protected methionine and histidine on performance of dairy cows,” 2015, journalofdairyscience.org. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8791.
  57. A. Varga and E. S. Kolver, “Microbial and animal limitations to fiber digestion and utilization,” 1997, Elsevier. doi: 10.1093/jn/127.5.819s.
  58. Yan, C. S. Mayne, and M. G. Porter, “Effects of dietary and animal factors on methane production in dairy cows offered grass silage-based diets,” Int. Congr. Ser., vol. 1293, pp. 123–126, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ics.2006.02.024.
  59. Piluzza, L. Sulas, and S. Bullitta, “Tannins in forage plants and their role in animal husbandry and environmental sustainability: A review,” Grass Forage Sci., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 32–48, 2014, doi: 10.1111/gfs.12053.
  60. T. Adesogan, Z. X. Ma, J. J. Romero, and K. G. Arriola, “Ruminant Nutrition Symposium: Improving cell wall digestion and animal performance with fibrolytic enzymes,” J. Anim. Sci., vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 1317–1330, 2014, doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7273.
  61. M. El-Zaiat, W. Al-Marzooqi, and K. Al-Kharousi, “Effects of Chitosan-Based Additive on Rumen Fermentation and Microbial Community, Nutrients Digestibility and Lactation Performance in Goats,” J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl)., 2024, doi: 10.1111/jpn.14057.
  62. F. Ferraretto, R. D. Shaver, and S. J. Bertics, “Effect of dietary supplementation with live-cell yeast at two dosages on lactation performance, ruminal fermentation, and total-tract nutrient digestibility in dairy cows,” 2012, Elsevier. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5190.
  63. Bernabucci, P. Bani, B. Ronchi, N. Lacetera, and A. Nardone, “Influence of Short- and Long-Term Exposure to a Hot Environment on Rumen Passage Rate and Diet Digestibility by Friesian Heifers,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 967–973, 1999, doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75316-6.
Ahead of Print Subscription Review Article
Volume 16
02
Received 25/05/2026
Accepted 27/06/2026
Published 28/06/2026
Publication Time 34 Days
17

Login


My IP

PlumX Metrics